Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T20:50:45.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Profit Differentials Between Canadian and U.S. Commercial Banks: the Role of Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Mark W. Nichols  and
Jill M. Hendrickson
Mark W. Nichols
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
Jill M. Hendrickson
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of the South, Sewanee, TN 37383
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using annual data on nationally chartered U.S. and Canadian banks from 1929 to 1989, this article empirically evaluates the impact of various regulations on bank profitability. An intercountry comparison reveals that the less restrictive regulatory environment in Canada has historically resulted in higher bank profits. Specifically, higher leverage, greater securities investment and lending opportunities, and the freedom to establish branch units all significantly contribute to higher bank profitability in Canada. Evidence presented also shows that U.S. banks would have been more profitable over the sample period in a regulatory environment similar to Canada's.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 674 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baghestani, Hamid. “Covered Interest Parity: Evidence from the U.S. - Canadian Money Markets.” Indian Economic Review 28, no. 1 (1993): 101–09.Google Scholar
Bank of Canada, Bank of Canada Review. Ottawa, Ontario: Bank of Canada, various years.Google Scholar
Benston, George J., Gerald, A. Hanweck, and David, B. Humphrey. “Scale Economies in Banking.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 14, no. 4 (1982, Pt. 1): 435–56.Google Scholar
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Banking and Monetary Statistics, 1914–1941. Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 1976.Google Scholar
Boothe, Paul. “Interest Parity, Cointegration, and the Term Structure in Canada and the United States.” Canadian Journal of Economics 24, no. 3 (1991): 595–603.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D., Hugh, Rockoff, and Redish, Angela. “The U.S. Banking System from a Northern Exposure: Stability Versus Efficiency.” this JOURNAL 54, no. 2 (1994): 325-41.Google Scholar
Calomiris, Charles W. “Is Deposit Insurance Necessary? A Historical Perspective.” this JOURNAL 50, no. 2 (1990): 283–95.Google Scholar
Carr, Jack L., Frank, G. Mathewson, and Neil, C. Quigley. Ensuring Failure: Financial System Stability and Deposit Insurance in Canada. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute, 1994.Google Scholar
Clark, Jeffrey A. “Economies of Scale and Scope at Depository Financial Institutions: A Review of the Literature.” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, (09/10 1988): 16–33.Google Scholar
Cooper, Kerry, and Fraser, Donald. Banking Deregulation and the New Competition in Financial Services. Boston: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1984.Google Scholar
Davidson, Russell, and James, G. MacKinnon. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Doukas, John, and Switzer, Morne. “Economies of Scale and Scope in Canadian Branch Banking.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 1, no. 2 (1991): 61–84.Google Scholar
Drummond, Ian M. “Why Canadian Banks Did Not Collapse in the 1930s.” In The Role of Banks in the Interwar Economy, edited by Harold, James, Hakan, Lindgren, and Alice, Teichova, 232–50. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R.Alton, . “Bank Market Structure and Competition.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 16, no. 4 (1984, pt. 2): 617–45.Google Scholar
Granger, Clive W.J. “Some Properties of Time Series Data and Their Use in Econometric Model Specification.” Journal of Econometrics 16, no. 1 (1981): 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Allan. “Testing Interest Rate Parity and Rational Expectations for Canada and the United States.” Canadian Journal of Economics 20, no. 2 (1987): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, James D.Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Steven. Monetary Evolution, Free Banking, & Economic Order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Johansen, Sφren. “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, no. 2/3 (1988): 231–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, George G. “Securities Activities of Commercial Banks: Recent Changes in Economic and Legal Environments.” Journal of Financial Services Research 1, no. 2 (1988): 183–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, Michael. “Bank Capital Regulation in the 1980s: Effective or Ineffective?” In Bank Management and Regulation, edited by Anthony, Saunders, Gregory, F. Udell, and Lawrence, J. White, 147–64. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1992.Google Scholar
Kelly, , Edward, J. III, “Legislative History of the Glass-Steagall Act.” In Deregulating Wall Street: Commercial Bank Penetration of the Corporate Securities Market, edited by Walter, Ingo, 41–65. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
Kryzanowski, Lawrence, and Gordon, S. Roberts. “Bank Structure in Canada.” In Banking Structures in Major Countries, edited by Kaufman, George G., 1–57. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Litan, Robert E. “Reuniting Investment and Commercial Banking.” In The Financial Services Revolution: Policy Direction for the Future, edited by Catherine, England and Thomas, Huertas, 269–87. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, Anselm, . “The Stability of the Interest Rate Parity Relationship Between Canada and the United States: A Note.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 63, no. 4 (1981): 625–26.Google Scholar
Maggs, Gary, and Pate, David. “The New Federal Stance on Bank Expansion: The RiegleNeal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994.” Durell Journal of Money and Banking 7, no.3 (1995): 17–22.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Mary M., and Martin, H. Wolfson. “The Profitability of Insured Commercial Banks in 1987.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 74, no. 7 (1988): 403–18.Google Scholar
Nathan, Alli, and Edwin, Neave. “Competition and Contestability in Canada's Financial System: Empirical Results.” Canadian Journal of Economics 22, no. 3 (1989): 576–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Alli, Edwin, Neave. “Operating Efficiency of Canadian Banks.” Journal of Financial Services Research 6, no. 3 (1992): 265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Sherrill. “Competition in the U.S. Banking Industiy.” Economics Letters 29, no. 4 (1989): 321–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Sherrill. “A Test of Competition in Canadian Banking.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 25, no. 1 (1993): 49–61.Google Scholar
Shearer, Ronald A., John, F. Chant, and David, E. Bond. The Economics of the Canadian Financial System: Theory, Policy & Institutions. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall Canada Inc., 1984.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada, Canada Year Book. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada, various years.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada, Historical Statistics of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario: Statistics Canada, 1983.Google Scholar
U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, Annual Reports of the Comptroller of the Currency. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.Google Scholar
White, Eugene Nelson. “Before the Glass-Steagall Act: An Analysis of the Investment Banking Activities of National Banks.” Explorations in Economic History 23, no. 1 (1986): 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Martin H., and Mary, M. McLaughlin. “Recent Developments in the Profitability and Lending Practices of Commercial Banks.” Federal Reserve Bulletin 75, no. 7 (1989): 461–84.Google Scholar