Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T06:33:28.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study in Meteorological and Trade Cycle History: The Economic Crisis Following the Napoleonic Wars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

John D. Post
John D. Post
Affiliation:
Northeastern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The factors regulating the production and distribution of material wealth cannot be reduced exclusively to market relationships. This being the case, the economic historian cannot limit his borrowings to economics alone. The present article uses meteorology both in its theoretical and historical dimensions to show the interaction between economic and meteorological fluctuations. The attempt of W. S. Jevons to find a theoretical connection between solar cycles and trade cycles is well known. Economic historians of preindustrial Europe have identified weather patterns as a primary independent variable determining prosperity or depression. The impact of meteorological fluctuation on economic activity has also been noticed for the nineteenth century, acknowledged by theorist and historian alike as one of the major variables inducing trade cycles. But in these accounts weather patterns are introduced as a run of good or bad luck, affecting essentially regional or national economies.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 1974 , pp. 315 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For two of the better known examples of the effect of meteorology on preindustrial trade cycles see Ashton, T. S., Economic Fluctuations in England, 1700–1800 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959)Google Scholar; and Labrousse, C. E., La crise de l'économie française à la fin de l'ancien régime et au début de la Révolution (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1944)Google Scholar; for the nineteenth century see Matthews, R. C. O., A Study in Trade-Cycle History: Economic Fluctuations in Great Britain 1833–1842 (Cambridge University Press, 1954)Google Scholar; and Mathias, Peter, The First Industrial Nation: An Economic History of Britain, 1700–1914 (London: Methuen, 1969), pp. 227–39.Google Scholar

2 Brooks, C. E. P., Climate through the Ages (Rev. ed., New York and Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1949).Google Scholar

3 Lamb, H. H., The Changing Climate (London: Methuen, 1966)Google Scholar; Rudloff, Hans von, Die Schwankungen und Pendelungen des Klimas in Europa sett dem Beginn der regelmässigen Instrumenten-Beobachtungen (1670) (Braunschweig: Viewig, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar For attempts to correlate climate fluctuation with economic fluctuations see Utterström, Gustav, “Climatic Fluctuations and Population Problems in Early Modem History,” Scandinavian Economic History Review, III (1955), 1–47Google Scholar; Ladurie, E. Le Roy, Histoire du climat depuis l'an mil (Paris: Flammarion, 1967)Google Scholar; idem, , Times of Feast, Times of Famine (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1971).Google Scholar For a discussion of these works and the issues see Post, John D., “Meteorological Historiography,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, III, (Spring, 1973), 721–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Lamb, H. H., Climate: Present, Past and Future, Vol. 1. Fundamentals and Climate Now (London: Methuen, 1972), p. 254.Google Scholar For an extended discussion of the causes of meteorological fluctuation see pp. 254–306, 385–464.

5 This explanation has been reduced to essentials. A long scientific literature on the subject exists. The following citations represent a chronological listing of significant works valuable for historians: Abbot, C. G. and Fowle, F. E., “Volcanoes and Climate,” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, LX, No. 2176 (March 28, 1913), 3–22Google Scholar; Humphreys, William J., “Volcanic Dust and Other Factors in the Production of Climatic Changes and Their Possible Relation to Ice Ages,” Bulletin of the Mount Weather Observatory, VI (1913), 1–34Google Scholar; idem, Physics of the Air (3d. ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1940), pp. 587–618Google Scholar; Wexler, Harry, “Volcanoes and World Climate,” Scientific American, CLXXXVI (April 1952), 74–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lamb, H. H., “Volcanic Dust in the Atmosphere: with a Chronology and an Assessment of its Meteorological Significance,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Ser. A, CCLXVI (1970), 425–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Climate, pp. 47–49, 410–35.

6 Inadvertent Climate Modification: Report of the Study of Man's Impact on Climate (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1971), pp. 280–83Google Scholar; Lamb, “Volcanic Dust,” pp. 461–69; idem, Climate, p. 47.

7 Lamb, H. H. and Johnson, A. I., “Secular Variations of the Atmospheric Circulation since 1750,” Geophysical Memoirs, No. 110 (London; Meteorological Office, HMSO, 1966), pp.. 117–21Google Scholar; idem, Changing Climate, pp. 48–55; idem, Climate, pp. 254–63, 336–38; Pittock, A. B., “How Important are Climatic Changes,” Weather XXVII (July 1972), 262–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Lamb, “Volcanic Dust,” pp. 500–25.

9 Wolff, F. von, Der Vulkanismus (2 vols.; Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke, 1914), II, pp. 236–37Google Scholar; Sapper, Karl, Vulkankunde (Stuttgart: Englehorn, 1927), pp. 268–69.Google Scholar

10 Lamb, “Volcanic Dust,” pp. 485–96, 528–31; idem, Climate, pp. 423–24.

11 Lamb, Climate, p. 425.

12 Temperature data during the early nineteenth century was reported according to the Centigrade, Réamur, and Fahrenheit scales. Since English language readers are accustomed to Fahrenheit values, all readings and deviations have been converted to this scale from Centigrade or Réamur whenever necessary. In dealing with deviations from mean temperatures, tenths of degrees have been retained when available. Average temperatures, however, have usually been rounded to whole numbers, since decimal point precision is neither regularly available nor essential.

13 For meteorological investigations of the weather in 1816 see Hoyt, Joseph B., “The Cold Summer of 1816,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, XLVIII (June 1958), 118–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Henry, Alfred J., “Abnormal Summers in the United -States,” U. S. Weather Bureau, Monthly Weather Review, LV (August 1927), 349–532.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Willis I. Milham, “The Year 1816, the Causes of Abnormalities,” Ibid., LII (December 1924), 563–70.

14 A summary of the weather log is found in Dewey, Chester, “Results of Meteorological Observations Made at Williamstown, Massachusetts,” Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, IV (1818–1821), 387–92.Google Scholar Dewey was Professor of Mathematics and Natural Philosophy, Williams College. An excellent meteorological analysis of the weather log is found in Milham, “The Year 1816.”

15 Dewey, “Meteorological Observations,” pp. 388–89.

16 Treshow, Michael, Environment and Plant Response (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970), pp. 78–91.Google Scholar

17 Niles’ Weekly Register, August 10, 1816, pp. 385–86.Google Scholar

18 Memoirs of the Philadelphia Society for Promoting Agriculture, IV (1818)Google Scholar; National Intelligencer, September 6, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; Western Intelligencer (Columbus, Ohio), December 5, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; Nashville Whig, February 5, 1817, p. 3.Google Scholar

19 Thomas, David, Travels through the Western Country in the Summer of 1816 (Auburn, New York, 1819), pp. 55, 72–73; 105–06Google Scholar; Western Intelligencer, May 16, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; Missouri Gazette (St Louis), June 15, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; Carter, Clarence E., ed., The Territorial Papers of the United States, Vol. X, The Territory of Michigan 1805–1820 (Washington, D.C.: U.S.G.P.O., 1942), p. 644Google Scholar; National Intelligencer, September 9, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; Buck, Solon J., ed., “Tioneer Letters of Gershom Flagg,” Transactions of the Illinois State Historical Society, XV (1910), 147–49Google Scholar; Alexander, William Henry, A Climatological History of Ohio (Columbus: Ohio State University Engineering Experiment Station, 1924), p. 709.Google Scholar

20 Copied by National Intelligencer, August 27, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; Letter to David B. Warden, dated Monticello, May 17, 1816, in Thomas Jefferson's Farm Book, ed. by Betts, Edwin Morris, Vol. 35, Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1953), p. 303Google Scholar; Raleigh Register, June 14, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; National Intelligencer, September 3, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; September 13, 1816, p. 2.

21 Records of the Moravians in North Carolina 1752–1879, ed. by Fries, Adelaide L. (11 vols.; Raleigh: State Department of Archives and History, 1947), VII, pp. 3Google Scholar,294–318; Raleigh Register, September 13, 1816, p. 3.Google Scholar

22 Niles’ Weekly Register, September 21, 1816, p. 64Google Scholar; Raleigh Register, September 20, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; Haynsworth, James, , M. D., “Account of the Winter Epidemic of 1815, 16, and 17, As it Appeared in Salem and Claremont Counties,” New York Medical Repository, New Ser., IV (1818), 8.Google Scholar

23 Breckenridge, Richard, “Diary 1816,” in Transactions of the Alabama Historical Society, II (1898–1899), 149Google Scholar; National Intelligencer, May 6, 1817, p. 2Google Scholar; Carter, The Territory of Alabama, pp. 24, 35, 88; Nashville Whig, February 5, 1817, p. 3Google Scholar; Westem Spy, November 22, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; Niles’ Weekly Register, February 8, 1817, p. 400.Google Scholar

24 Chladni, E. F. F., “Ueber die Urfachen des nasskalten Sommer von 1816, und zum Theil auch 1817,” Annalen der Physik, LXII (1819), 133–34Google Scholar; Raleigh Register, January 10, 1817, p. 3Google Scholar; North American Review, III (July 1816), 285.Google Scholar

25 The Times (London), March 20, 1817, p. 2Google Scholar; June 23, 1817, p. 3; July 18, 1817, p. 2.

26 The Times, September 9, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; July 20, 1816, p. 3; November 18, 1816, p. 2; Montreal Gazette, June 8, 1816Google Scholar; National Intelligencer, August 13, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; Western Spy, May 24, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; August 9, 1816, p. 2; November 1, 1816, p. 1.

27 Milham, “The Year 1816,” p. 565; Henry, “Abnormal Summers,” p. 351.

28 Brunt, D., “Periodicities in European Weather,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Ser. A, CCXV (1925), 294.Google Scholar

29 Manley, Gordon, “The Mean Temperature of Central England, 1698–1952,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, LXXIX (1953), 242–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Mossman, Robert C., “The Meteorology of Edinburgh,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, XXXIX (1896–1899), 91.Google Scholar

31 Harty, William, , M.D., An Historic Sketch of the Causes, Progress, Extent and Mortality of the Contagious Fever Epidemic in Ireland during the Years 1817, 1818, and 1819 (Dublin, 1820), pp. 113–115.Google Scholar

32 The manuscript containing the observations made at Ghent by Guillaume Schamp is reproduced in Vanderlinden, Emile, “Chronique des événements météoroliques en Belgique jusqu'en 1834,” Memoirs de L'Academie royale de Belgique, Classe des sciences, 2d Ser., VI (1924), 1–329.Google Scholar

33 Labryn, Aart, Het klimaat van Nederland, gedurende de laatste twee en een halve eeuw (Schiedam: Roelants 1945), pp. 86, 93Google Scholar; Annual Register 1816, “Chronicle,” p. 95Google Scholar; The Times, August 2, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; October 26,1816, p. 2.

34 Brunt, “European Weather,” p. 299; Duchaussoy, M. H., “Le bans de vendanges de la région parisienne,” La météorohgie (March-April 1934), p. 130.Google Scholar

35 France. Ministére de l'Intérieur, Circulates, instructions et autre actes émanés du ministère de l'intérieur de 1797 à 1821 inclusivement, (2d ed., 6 vols., Paris, 1821–1830), III, pp. 136–40Google Scholar, Marlin, Roger, La crise des subsistances de 1816–1817 dans le Doubs (Besançon: Jacques & Demonstrond, 1960), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

36 Duchaussoy, “Bans de vendanges,” pp. 111–15, 130.

37 See the table in Bider, M., Schüepp, M., and Rudloff, Hans von, “Die Reduktion der 200-jährigen Basler Temperaturreihe,” Archiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatohgie, Serie B, 9 (1959)Google Scholar, Appendix. This table displays annual temperature deviations from the mean 1851–1950 for the following 14 locations: Basel, Strasbourg, Karlsruhe, Stuttgart, Geneva, Paris, De Bilt (Holland), Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Trieste, Milan, Turin, and the Hohenpeissenberg (Bavaria).

38 For references to support this conclusion see Post, John D., “The Economic Crisis of 1816–1817 and Its Social and Political Consequences” (Unpublished dissertation, Boston University (1969), pp. 44–67Google Scholar, 310–56, 365–418, 434–95. The evidence is found in government documents, the press, scientific journals, formal historical works, contemporary informed observations, agricultural publications, and articles in local scholarly journals.

39 Gilbert, Ludwig Wilhelm, ed., “Aus einem Schreiben des Professor Brandes zu Breslau, meteorologischen Inhalts,” Annalen der Physik, LV (1817) 112–14Google Scholar; The Times, September 4, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; November 7, 1816, p. 2; January 13, 1817, p. 2; March 21, 1817, p. 3;Kahan, Arcaaius, “Natural Calamities and Their Effect upon the Food Supply in Russia (An Introduction to a Catalog),” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas, N. F., XVI (September 1968), 373–76.Google Scholar

40 The Times, September 5, 1816, p. 3; March 3, 1817, pp. 2–3; May 12, 1817, p. 2Google Scholar; Sancnez-Albornoz, Nicholás, Las crisis de subsistencias de España en el sigh XIX (Rosario, Argentina: Instituto de Investigaciones Historicas, 1963), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

41 Godinho, Victorino Magalhães, Prix et monnaies au Portugal, 1750–1850 (Paris: Armand Colin, 1955), pp. 70–74Google Scholar; The Times, November 5, 1816, p. 2.Google Scholar

42 Niles’ Weekly Register, February 1, 1817, p. 379.Google Scholar

43 Arakawa, H., “Meteorological Conditions of the Great Famines in the Last Half of the Tokugawa Period, Japan,” Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics, VI, No. 2 (September 1955), 105–06.Google Scholar

44 Jameson, James, Report on the Epidemick Cholera Morbus as It Visited the Territories Subject to the Presidency of Bengal in the Years 1817, 1818, and 1819 (Calcutta, 1820), pp. xxvix–liGoogle Scholar, 92–94.

45 For contemporary discussion of the association between sunspots and meteorological phenomena see Gentleman's Magazine, LXXXVIII (February 1817), 109–10Google Scholar; Western Spy, May 10, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; National Intelligencer, May 13, 1816, p. 2Google Scholar; June 27, 1816, p. 2; Wiirttembergisches Jahrbuch fur 1818, p. 509.

46 Lamb, Climate, pp. 440–58; Milham, “The Year 1816,” pp. 566–67; Hoyt, “The Cold Summer of 1816,” p. 128; Shaw, David, “Sunspots and Temperature,” Journal of Geophysical Research, LXX (October 15, 1965), 4, 997–98Google Scholar; Clayton, H. H., “Sunspot Changes and Weather Changes,” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, CIV, No. 19 (March 6, 1946), 1–29.Google Scholar

47 Chladni, “Urfachen des nasskalten Sommer,” p. 132; Gentleman's Magazine, LXXXVIII (February 1818), 136Google Scholar; Mitchell, Dr. Thomas, “Atmospheric Constitution of New York, from March to July, 1816,” New York Medical Repository, New Sen, 111(1817), 304.Google Scholar

48 Lamb, Climate, pp. 301–03, 330–33, 337–41, 385–88.

49 Mitchell, “Atmospheric Constitution,” pp. 301–302.

50 Humphreys, “Volcanic Dust,” pp. 25–26; Lamb, “Volcanic Dust,” pp. 430–35.

51 National Intelligencer, May 1, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar, Abbot and Fowle, “Volcanoes and Climate,” p. 4.

52 Bath, B.H. Slicher van, The Agrarian History of Western Europe, A.D. 500–1850, trans, by Olive Ordish (London: Edward Arnold, 1963), pp. 3–4:Google ScholarChambers, J. D. and Mingay, G. E., The Agricultural Revolution 1750–1880 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1964), pp. 21–22Google Scholar; Ashton, Economic Fluctuations, pp. 37–38, 42–43.

53 The hypothesis first appeared in Labrousse, C. E., Esquisse du mouvement des prix et des revenus en France au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1932)Google Scholar; it was restated and refined in La crise de l'économie française, esp. pp. 172–80. Labrousse has explicitly included the postwar crisis 1816–1819 within his model of harvest-dominated cycles in La mouvement ouvrier et les idées sociales en France de 1815 à la fin du XIXe siècle (Paris: Centre de Documentation Universitaires, 1948) pp. 30–31Google Scholar. For the most useful English summary, see Landes, David S., “The Statistical Study of French Crises,” Journal of Economic History, X (November 1950), 196–201Google Scholar, which is relied upon here.

54 France, Statistique générale, Archives statistiques du ministère des travaux publics, de l'agriculture et du commerce (Paris, 1837), p. 15.Google Scholar

55 Landes, “Statistical Study,” pp. 197, 200–01.

56 Behr, Wilhelm Joseph, Das Recht und die Pflicht der Regierungen in Beziehung auf die gegenwärtige Theuerungsangelegenheit (Würzburg, 1817), p. 25.Google Scholar

57 For France see Quotidiénne, June 4, 1817, pp. 2–3Google Scholar; June 6, 1817, p. 2; June 15, 1817, p. 3; Marjolin, Robert, “Troubles provoqués en France par la disette de 1816–1817,” Revue d'histoire moderne, New Ser., X (Nov.-Dec. 1933), 425–48Google Scholar; for the, Netherlands see Moniteur (Paris), June 17, 1817, p. 661; June 30, 1817, p. 713; Quotidienne, August 11, 1817, p. 3Google Scholar; for Germany see The Times, May 10, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; January 1, 1817, p. 2; July 26, 1817, p. 2; Gentleman's Magazine, LXXXVIII (January 1818), 72Google Scholar; for the United Kingdom see The Times, May 10, 1816, p. 3Google Scholar; August 30, 1816, p. 2; November 28, 1816, p. 3; December 23, 1816, p. 3; January 27, 1817, p. 3; February 17, 1817, p. 3; April 19, 1817, p. 3.

58 Gülich, Gustav von, Geschichtliche Darstellung des Handels, der Gewerbe, und des Ackerbaus der bedeutendsten handeltreibenden Staaten unserer Zeit (2 vols.; Jena, 1830), II, pp. 362–64Google Scholar; Landwirthschaftliche Zeitung oder Der Land- und. Hauswirth, XV, No. 10 (1817), 92Google Scholar; Jones, Seasons and Prices, pp. 84–85, 160; Guéneau, Louis, “La disette de 1816–1817 dans une région productrice de blé, la Brie,” Revue d'histoire moderne, IX (Jan.-Feb. 1929), 21Google Scholar; The Times, August 22, 1818, p. 2Google Scholar; Csaplovics, Johann von, Gemälde von Ungern (2 vols.; Budapest, 1829), I, p. 142.Google Scholar

59 Gülich, Geschichtliche Darstellung, II, p. 263.

60 Sterling, Eleonore O., “Anti-Jewish Riots in Germany in 1819: A Displacement of Social Protest,” Historia Judaica, XII (April 1950), 112.Google Scholar

61 Cole, Arthur H., “Cyclical and Seasonal Variations in the Sale of Public Lands 1816–1860,” Review of Economic Statistics, IX (January 1927), 52Google Scholar; Rohrbough, Malcolm J., The Land Office Business: The Settlement and Administration of American Public Lands, 1789–1837 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1968) pp. 91–92.Google Scholar

62 The Times, October 15, 1818, p. 2Google Scholar; Puryear, Vernon J., “Odessa: Its Rise and International Importance, 1815–1850,” Pacific Historical Review, III (1934), 195–97Google Scholar; Tengoborskii, Ludwik, Commentaries on the Productive Forces of Russia (2 vols.; London, 1855–1856), II p. 294.Google Scholar

63 Beidtel, Ignez, Geschichte der österreichischen Staatsverwaltung 1740–1848 (2 vols.; Innsbruck, 1896–1898), II, pp. 303–04Google Scholar; Vidalenc, Jean, he peuple des campagnes: la socété française de 1815 á 1848 (Paris: Rivière, 1969), p. 337Google Scholar; Abel, Agrarkrisen, pp. 209–23; Demoulin, Guillaume Ier, pp. 213–14; Brugger, Hans, Die schweizerische Landwirtschaft in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhundert (Frauenfeld: Huber & Co., 1956), pp. 127–28Google Scholar; Jacob, William, Report of the Trade in Foreign Corn, and on the Agriculture of the North of Europe (3d ed.; London, 1826), p. 110Google Scholar, passim; United Kingdom, Parliamentary Papers, Report from Committee on the Agriculture of the United Kingdom, Session 23 January to 11 July, 1821, IX, p. 267, The Times, April 5, 1817, p. 3; Sterling, Eleonore, Er ist wie Du. Aus der Frühgeschichte des Antisemitismus in Deutschland (1815–1850) (Munich: Kaiser, 1956), pp. 36–37Google Scholar; Otruba, Gustav, “Wirtschaft und soziale Lage Österreichs im Vormärz,” Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur, X (1966), 161–76Google Scholar; Romani, Mario, Storia economica d'Italia nel secolo XIX (2d ed.; Milan: Giuffre, 1970), pp. 37–45.Google Scholar

64 France. Stastique générale, Statistique de la France: Commerce extérieur (Paris, 1838), p. 263.Google Scholar

65 The Times, September 23, 1817, p. 2Google Scholar; Tooke, Thomas and Newmarch, William, A History of Prices and of the State of Circulation from 1792 to 1856 (6 vols.; New York, 1857), II, p. 24.Google Scholar

66 Mitchell, B. R. and Deane, Phyllis, Abstract of British Historical Statistics, (Cambridge: the University Press, 1962), p. 95Google Scholar; Tooke, High and Low Prices. Part III, p. 181.

67 Gentleman's Magazine, LXXXIX (June 1819), 573.Google Scholar

68 The following unit prices were used in this computation; wheat 70s. per quarter; rye 35s.; barley 30s.; oats 20s. These prices are based on the average grain prices at the Danzig market found in Jacob, Report of the Trade in Foreign Corn, p. 211; and the prices for wheat in Danzig and Königsburg in Tooke, High and Low Prices. Part IV, p. 65.

69 Acworth, A. W., Financial Reconstruction in England 1815–1822 (London: P.S. King, 1925), p. 80.Google Scholar

70 Abel, Wilhelm, Agrarkrisen und Agrarkonjunktur (2d ed.; Hamburg and Berlin: Paul Parey, 1966), p. 210.Google Scholar