Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:43:08.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of the Wealth Effects of Japanese Offshore Dollar-Denominated Convertible and Warrant Bond Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Jun-Koo Kang
Affiliation:
College of Business Administration, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881
Yong-Cheol Kim
Affiliation:
College of Commerce and Industry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
Kyung-Joo Park
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business Administration, Fordham University, New York, NY 10023
René M. Stulz
Affiliation:
College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210

Abstract

Offshore dollar-denominated equity-linked issues were a more important source of funds for Japanese companies during the 1980s than domestic equity and straight debt issues combined. Using a sample of Japanese equity-linked offshore issues from 1977 to 1989, we find that the announcement of these issues is accompanied by a significant positive abnormal return. This contrasts with evidence that U.S. equity-linked issues have a significant negative stock price reaction. We provide an explanation for the difference in stock price reactions between U.S. and Japanese issues that is based on the greater influence on managers' security issue decisions of long-term investors and banks in Japan than in the U.S.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P.. “Robust Financial Contracting and the Role of Venture Capitalists.” Journal of Finance, 49 (1994), 371402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, T. J.Euromarket Instruments, A Guide to the World's Largest Debt Market. New York, NY: New York Institute of Finance (1990).Google Scholar
Asquith, P., and Mullins, D. W. Jr. “Equity Issues and Offering Dilution.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (1986), 3160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., and Hamao, Y.. “Changing Patterns of Corporate Financing and the Main Bank System in Japan.” Mimeo (1993).Google Scholar
Conrad, J.The Price Effect of Option Introduction.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 487498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, L., and Mikkelson, W.. “Convertible Debt Issuance, Capital Structure Change and Financing-Related Information: Some New Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (1984), 157186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybvig, P. H., and Zender, J. F.. “Capital Structure and Dividend Irrelevance with Asymmetric Information.” Review of Financial Studies, 4 (1991), 201220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlach, M. L.Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, J. E., and Tschoegl, A.. Corporate Finance in Japan, in Japanese Capital Markets, Takagi, Shinji, ed. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell (1993).Google Scholar
Hoshi, T.; Kashyap, A.; and Scharfstein, D.. “The Role of Banks in Reducing the Costs of Financial Distress in Japan.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshi, T.; Kashyap, A.; and Scharfstein, D.. “The Choice between Public and Private Debt: An Analysis of Post-Deregulation Corporate Financing in Japan.” Mimeo, M.I.T. (1993).Google Scholar
James, C.Some Evidence on the Uniqueness of Bank Loans.” Journal of Financial Economics, 19 (1987), 217236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, J.-K., and Stulz, R. M.. “How Different is Japanese Corporate Finance? An investigation of the Information Content of New Security Issues.” Review of Financial Studies (forthcoming 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, K., and Schallheim, J. S.. “Public and Private Placements of Seasoned Equity Issues in Japan.” Unpubl. Paper, Univ. of Utah (1992).Google Scholar
Kim, Y.-C., and Stulz, R. M.. “The Eurobond Market and Corporate Financial Policy: A Test of the Clientele Hypothesis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 22 (1988), 189206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y.-C., and Stulz, R. M.. “Is There a Global Market for Convertible Bonds?” Journal of Business, 65 (1992), 7591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, D. J., and McDonald, R. L.. “Equity Issues and Stock Price Dynamics.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 10191043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lummer, S. L., and McConnell, J. J.. “Further Evidence on the Bank Lending Process and the Capital-Market Response to Bank Loan Agreements.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25 (1989), 99122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelson, W., and Partch, M.. “Valuation Effects of Security Offerings and the Issuance Process.” Journal of Financial Economics, 15 (1986), 3160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, S., and Majluf, N.. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (1984), 187221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niimi, K.Current Trends in the Japanese Corporate Debt Market.” Japan Research Quarterly, (1992a), 2648.Google Scholar
Niimi, K.An Analysis of Bond Rating in Japan: Its History, Status, and Future.” Japan Research Quarterly, (1992b), 35118.Google Scholar
Persons, J. C.Renegotiation and the Impossibility of Optimal Investment.” Review of Financial Studies, 7 (1994), 419449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, F. M.Financial Politics in Contemporary Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press (1989).Google Scholar
Scholes, M., and Williams, J.. “Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 309328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar