Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T04:54:14.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Price Continuity Rules and Insider Trading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Prajit K. Dutta  and
Ananth Madhavan
Prajit K. Dutta
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025
Ananth Madhavan
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Restrictions on transaction price changes are a feature of many security markets. This paper analyzes the impact of such price continuity rules on price dynamics and examines possible rationales for their existence. Contrary to popular belief, continuity rules need not reduce price efficiency, although they do result in a redistribution of profits among traders and dealers. Indeed, continuity rules may enhance price efficiency because traders have greater incentives to gather costly information. We provide a new rationale for continuity rules besides the stated objective of stabilizing prices. In particular, we show that continuity requirements act to restrict dealers' expected profits from trading with liquidity traders. The results provide insights into the design of an “optimal” continuity rule.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 199 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P.. “A Theory of Intraday Trading Patterns.” Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1988), 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, U., and Spiegel, M.. “Anatomy of a Market Breakdown: NYSE Trading Suspensions 1974–1988.” Working Paper, Univ. of Iowa (1990).Google Scholar
Black, F. “Toward a Fully Automated Stock Exchange: Part I.” Financial Analysts Journal, 27 (07–08 1971), 28–35, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D., and Viswanathan, S.. “The Effect of Public Information and Competition on Trading Volume and Price Volatility.” Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1993), 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, T. J., and Hwang, C. Y.. “Transitory Price Changes and Price Limit Rules: Evidence from the Tokyo Stock Exchange.” Working Paper, Ohio State Univ. (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakansson, N.; Beja, A.; and Kale, J.. “On the Feasibility of Automated Market Making by a Programmed Specialist.” Journal of Finance, 40 (1985), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamao, Y., and Hasbrouck, J.. “Securities Trading in the Absence of Dealers: Trades and Quotes on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.” Working Paper, New York Univ. (1992).Google Scholar
Handa, P. “Order Flow and Bid-Ask Dynamics: An Empirical Investigation.” Working Paper, New York Univ. (1991).Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, J. “Measuring the Information Content of Stock Trades.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 178–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasbrouck, J., and Ho, T.. “Order Arrival, Quote Behavior, and the Return Generating Process.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1987), 1035–1048.Google Scholar
Holden, C., and Subrahmanyam, A.. “Long-Lived Private Information and Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 247–270.Google Scholar
Keim, D. B., and Madhavan, A.. “The Upstairs Market for Large-Block Transactions: Analysis and Measurement of Price Effects.” Working Paper, Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania (1993).Google Scholar
Kyle, A. “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica, 53 (1985), 1315–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madhavan, A., and Smidt, S.. “A Bayesian Model of Intraday Specialist Pricing.” Journal of Financial Economics, 30 (1991), 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulbroek, L. K. “An Empirical Analysis of Insider Trading and the Stock Market.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1661–1699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar