Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:07:18.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Target Firm Abnormal Returns and Trading Volume around the Initiation of Change in Control Transactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Abstract

This study examines the average abnormal returns, average abnormal trading volume, and reported insider trading of corporate control target firms during a period of possibly informed trading. This period begins on the unpublicized initiation date (as reported in a postannouncement date proxy statement or 14-D1) and ends on the publication date of the first Wall Street Journal story signalling an impending change in corporate control. We find that the preannouncement date average abnormal return noted by other researchers begins after the unpublicized initiation date of the transaction. We find no evidence of the preannouncement date average abnormal trading volume noted by previous researchers; instead, we find average abnormal volume beginning with the first public information regarding the transaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajinkya, B., and Jain, P.. “The Behavior of Daily Stock Market Trading Volume.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11 (11 1989), 331359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asquith, P.Merger Bids, Uncertainty, and Stockholder Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (04 1983), 5183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asquith, P.; Bruner, R.; and Mullins, D. Jr, “The Gains to Bidding Firms from Mergers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (04 1983), 121139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., and Warner, J.. “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics, 14 (03 1985), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D., and Dent, W.. “A Comparison of Alternative Methodologies used in Capital Market Research.” Journal of Accounting Research, 24 (Spring 1984), 4884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, D., and McConnell, J.. “Corporate Mergers and Security Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 16 (06 1986), 143187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, P.Merger Proposals, Management Discretion and Stockholder Wealth.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (06 1980), 105137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, P.Analyses of the Distribution of Security Market Model Prediction Errors for Daily Returns Data.” Journal of Accounting Research, 24 (Spring 1986), 7696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrell, G., and Poulsen, A.. “Stock Trading before the Announcement of Tender Offers: Insider Trading or Market Anticipation?Journal of Law, Economics, and Organizations, 8 (Fall 1989), 225248.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., and Ruback, R.. “The Market for Corporate Control.” Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (04 1983), 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keown, A., and Pinkerton, J.. “Merger Announcements and Insider Trading Activity: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Finance, 36 (09 1981), 855869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meulbroek, L. “An Empirical Analysis of Insider Trading and the Stock Market.” Unpubl. manuscript, Securities and Exchange Commission (08 1990).Google Scholar
Netter, J.; Poulsen, A.; and Hersch, P.. “Insider Trading: The Law, the Theory, the Evidence.” Contemporary Policy Issues, 6 (07 1988), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S.Information and Volatility: The No-Arbitrage Martingale Approach to Timing and Resolution Irrelevancy.” Journal of Finance, 44 (03 1989), 117.Google Scholar
Sanders, R., and Robins, R.. “Discriminating between Wealth and Information Effects in Event Studies in Accounting and Finance Research.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1 (07 1991), 307329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyhun, H.Insider's Profits, Costs of Trading, and Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 16 (06 1986), 189212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar