Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Drag reduction in boiling Taylor–Couette turbulence

  • Rodrigo Ezeta (a1), Dennis Bakhuis (a1), Sander G. Huisman (a1), Chao Sun (a1) (a2) and Detlef Lohse (a1) (a3)...

Abstract

We create a highly controlled laboratory environment – accessible to both global and local monitoring – to analyse turbulent boiling flows and in particular their shear stress in a statistically stationary state. By precisely monitoring the drag of strongly turbulent Taylor–Couette flow (the flow in between two coaxially rotating cylinders, Reynolds number $Re\approx 10^{6}$ ) during its transition from non-boiling to boiling, we show that the intuitive expectation, namely that a few volume per cent of vapour bubbles would correspondingly change the global drag by a few per cent, is wrong. Rather, we find that for these conditions a dramatic global drag reduction of up to 45 % occurs. We connect this global result to our local observations, showing that for major drag reduction the vapour bubble deformability is crucial, corresponding to Weber numbers larger than one. We compare our findings with those for turbulent flows with gas bubbles, which obey very different physics from those of vapour bubbles. Nonetheless, we find remarkable similarities and explain these.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Drag reduction in boiling Taylor–Couette turbulence
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Drag reduction in boiling Taylor–Couette turbulence
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Drag reduction in boiling Taylor–Couette turbulence
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: d.lohse@utwente.nl

References

Hide All
d’Agostino, L. & Salvetti, M. V. 2007 Fluid Dynamics of Cavitation and Cavitating Turbopumps. Springer.
Amalfi, R. L., Vakili-Farahani, F. & Thome, J. R. 2016 Flow boiling and frictional pressure gradients in plate heat exchangers. Part 2: comparison of literature methods to database and new prediction methods. Intl J. Refrig. 61, 185203.
Arndt, R. E. A. 2002 Cavitation in vortical flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 143175.
van der Berg, T. H., van Gils, D. P. M., Lathrop, D. P. & Lohse, D. 2007 Bubbly turbulent drag reduction is a boundary layer effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 084501.
van den Berg, T. H., Luther, S., Lathrop, D. P. & Lohse, D. 2005 Drag reduction in bubbly Taylor–Couette turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 044501.
Brennen, C. E. 1995 Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics. Oxford University Press.
Carlton, J. 2012 Marine Propellers and Propulsion. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Ceccio, S. L. 2010 Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 183203.
Deutsch, S., Moeny, M., Fontaine, A. A. & Petrie, H. 2004 Microbubble drag reduction in rough walled turbulent boundary layers with comparison against polymer drag reduction. Exp. Fluids 37, 731744.
Dhir, V. K. 1998 Boiling heat transfer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 365401.
Dhir, V. K. 2005 Mechanistic prediction of nucleate boiling heat transfer-achievable or a hopeless task? J. Heat Transfer 128, 112.
Eckhardt, B., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2007 Torque scaling in turbulent Taylor–Couette flow between independently rotating cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 581, 221250.
Einstein, A. 1906 Eine neue Bestimmung der Moleküldimensionen (in German). Ann. Phys. 324, 289306.
Elbing, B. R., Mäkiharju, S., Wiggins, A., Perlin, M., Dowling, D. R. & Ceccio, S. L. 2013 On the scaling of air layer drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 717, 484513.
Ezeta, R., Huisman, S. G., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2018 Turbulent strength in ultimate Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 836, 397412.
Geertsma, R. D., Negenborn, R. R., Visser, K. & Hopman, J. J. 2017 Design and control of hybrid power and propulsion systems for smart ships: a review of developments. Appl. Energy 194, 3054.
van Gils, D. P. M., Bruggert, G.-W., Lathrop, D. P., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2011a The Twente Taylor–Couette (T3C) facility: strongly turbulent (multiphase) flow between two independently rotating cylinders. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 025105.
van Gils, D. P. M., Huisman, S. G., Bruggert, G.-W., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2011b Torque scaling in turbulent Taylor–Couette flow with co- and counterrotating cylinders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 024502.
van Gils, D. P. M., Narezo, D., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2013 The importance of bubble deformability for strong drag reduction in bubbly turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 722, 317347.
Grossmann, S., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2016 High-Reynolds number Taylor–Couette turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 5380.
Gungor, K. E. & Winterton, R. H. S. 1986 A general correlation for flow boiling in tubes and annuli. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 29 (3), 351358.
Huisman, S. G., van Gils, D. P. M., Grossmann, S., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2012 Ultimate turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 024501.
Huisman, S. G., van der Veen, R. C. A., Bruggert, G.-W., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2015 The boiling Twente Taylor–Couette (BTTC) facility: temperature controlled turbulent flow between independently rotating, coaxial cylinders. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 065108.
Huisman, S. G., van der Veen, R. C. A., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2014 Multiple states in highly turbulent Taylor–Couette flow. Nat. Commun. 5, 3820.
Kim, J. 2009 Review of nucleate pool boiling bubble heat transfer mechanisms. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 35, 10671076.
Kumagai, I., Takahashi, Y. & Murai, Y. 2015 Power-saving device for air bubble generation using a hydrofoil to reduce ship drag: theory, experiments, and application to ships. Ocean Engng 95, 183194.
Lu, J., Fernández, A. & Tryggvason, G. 2005 The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 17, 095102.
Madavan, N. K., Deutsch, S. & Merkle, C. L. 1984 Reduction of turbulent skin friction by micro-bubbles. Phys. Fluids 27, 356.
Madavan, N. K., Deutsch, S. & Merkle, C. L. 1985 Measurements of local skin friction in a microbubble-modified turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 156, 237256.
Manga, M. & Brodsky, E. 2006 Seismic triggering of eruptions in the far field: volcanoes and geysers. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34, 263291.
Merkle, C. L. & Deutsch, S. 1992 Microbubble drag reduction in liquid turbulent boundary layers. Appl. Mech. Rev. 45, 103127.
Moriguchi, Y. & Kato, H. 2002 Influence of microbubble diameter and distribution on frictional resistance reduction. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 7, 7985.
Murai, Y. 2014 Frictional drag reduction by bubble injection. Exp. Fluids 55 (7), 1773.
Murai, Y., Oiwa, H. & Takeda, Y. 2008 Frictional drag reduction in bubbly Couette–Taylor flow. Phys. Fluids 20, 034101.
Nikolayev, V. S., Chtain, D., Garrabos, Y. & Beysens, D. 2006 Experimental evidence of the vapor recoil mechanism in the boiling crisis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 184503.
Paoletti, M. S. & Lathrop, D. P. 2011 Angular momentum transport in turbulent flow between independently rotating cylinders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 024501.
Prosperetti, A. 2017 Vapor bubbles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 221248.
Rausch, M. H., Kretschmer, L., Will, S., Leipertz, A. & Fröba, A. P. 2015 Density, surface tension, and kinematic viscosity of hydrofluoroethers HFE-7000, HFE-7100, HFE-7200, HFE-7300, and HFE-7500. J. Chem. Engng Data 60, 37593765.
Rosenberg, B. J., van Buren, T., Fu, M. K. & Smits, A. J. 2016 Turbulent drag reduction over air- and liquid-impregnated surfaces. Phys. Fluids 28, 015103.
Sanders, W. C., Winkel, E. S., Dowling, D. R., Perlin, M. & Ceccio, S. L. 2006 Bubble friction drag reduction in a high-Reynolds-number flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 552, 353380.
Shen, X., Ceccio, S. L. & Perlin, M. 2006 Influence of bubble size on micro-bubble drag reduction. Exp. Fluids 41, 415424.
Spandan, V., Verzicco, R. & Lohse, D. 2018 Physical mechanisms governing drag reduction in turbulent Taylor–Couette flow with finite-size deformable bubbles. J. Fluid Mech. 849, R3.
Sugiyama, K., Kawamura, T., Takagi, S. & Matsumoto, Y. 2004 The Reynolds number effect on the microbubble drag reduction. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Smart Conrol of Turbulence, Tokyo, Japan. pp. 3143.
Theofanous, T. G., Dinh, T. N., Tu, J. P. & Dinh, A. T. 2002a The boiling crisis phenomenon – part II: dryout dynamics and burnout. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 26, 793810.
Theofanous, T. G., Tu, J. P., Dinh, A. T. & Dinh, T. N. 2002b The boiling crisis phenomenon – part I: nucleation and nucleate boiling heat transfer. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 26, 775792.
Tong, L. S. 2018 Boiling Heat Transfer and Two-phase Flow. Routledge.
Toramaru, A. & Maeda, K. 2013 Mass and style of eruptions in experimental geysers. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 257, 227239.
Verschoof, R. A., van der Veen, R. C. A., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2016 Bubble drag reduction requires large bubbles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 104502.
Weisman, J. & Pei, B. S. 1983 Prediction of critical heat flux in flow boiling at low qualities. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 26 (10), 14631477.
Xu, J., Maxey, M. R. & Karniadakis, G 2002 Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction using micro-bubbles. J. Fluid Mech 468, 271281.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

JFM classification

Drag reduction in boiling Taylor–Couette turbulence

  • Rodrigo Ezeta (a1), Dennis Bakhuis (a1), Sander G. Huisman (a1), Chao Sun (a1) (a2) and Detlef Lohse (a1) (a3)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed