Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:55:19.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The physics of vortex merger and the effects of ambient stable stratification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2007

LAURA K. BRANDT  and
KEIKO K. NOMURA
LAURA K. BRANDT
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093-0411, USA
KEIKO K. NOMURA
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093-0411, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The merging of a pair of symmetric, horizontally oriented vortices in unstratified and stably stratified viscous fluid is investigated. Two-dimensional numerical simulations are performed for a range of flow conditions. The merging process is resolved into four phases of development and key underlying physics are identified. In particular, the deformation of the vortices, explained in terms of the interaction of vorticity gradient, ∇ω, and rate of strain, S, leads to a tilt in ω contours in the vicinity of the center of rotation (a hyperbolic point). In the diffusive/deformation phase, diffusion of the vortices establishes the interaction between ∇ω and mutually induced S. During the convective/deformation phase, induced flow by filaments and, in stratified flow, baroclinically generated vorticity (BV), advects the vortices thereby modifying S, which, in general, may enhance or hinder the development of the tilt. The tilting and diffusion of ω near the center hyperbolic point causes ω from the core region to enter the exchange band where it is entrained. In the convective/entrainment phase, the vortex cores are thereby eroded and ultimately entrained into the exchange band, whose induced flow becomes dominant and transforms the flow into a single vortex. The critical aspect ratio, associated with the start of the convective/entrainment phase, is found to be the same for both the unstratified and stratified flows. In the final diffusive/axisymmetrization phase, the flow evolves towards axisymmetry by diffusion. In general, the effects of stratification depend on the ratio of the diffusive time scale (growth of cores) to the turnover time (establishment of BV), i.e. the Reynolds number. A crossover Reynolds number is found, above which convective merging is accelerated with respect to unstratified flow and below which it is delayed.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 592 , 10 December 2007 , pp. 413 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brandt, L. K. & Nomura, K. K. 2006 The physics of vortex merger: further insight. Phys. Fluids 18, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, S. A. & Iversen, J. D. 1977 Merging of aircraft trailing vortices. J. Aircraft 14, 1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerretelli, C. & Williamson, C. H. K. 2003 The physical mechanism for vortex merging. J. Fluid Mech. 475, 41–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1985 The stability and energetics of corotating uniform vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 1998 On the persistence of non-axisymmetric vortices in inviscid two-dimensional flows. J. Fluid Mech. 371, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. 2002 Vortex merger in rotating stratified flows. J. Fluid Mech. 455, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dritschel, D. G. & Waugh, D. W. 1992 Quantification of the inelastic interaction of unequal vortices in two-dimensional vortex dynamics. Phys. Fluids A 4, 1737–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerz, T., Schumann, U. & Elghobashi, S. 1989 Direct simulation of stably stratified homogeneous turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 563–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. W. & Hopfinger, E. J. 1987 Coalescing of geostrophic vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 178, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hardenberg, J., McWilliams, J. C., Provenzale, A., Shchepetkin, A. & Weiss, J. B. 2000 Vortex merging in quasi-geostrophic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 412, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, M. J. 2005 The physical mechanism of symmetric vortex merger: A new viewpoint. Phys. Fluids 17, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, Y. & Herring, J. R. 2001 Gradient enhancement and filament ejection for a non-uniform elliptic vortex in two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 439, 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koop, C. G. & Browand, F. K. 1979 Instability and turbulence in stratified fluid with shear. J. Fluid Mech. 93, 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Dizes, S., & Verga, A. 2002 Viscous interactions of two co-rotating vortices before merging. J. Fluid Mech. 467, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, M. V., McWilliams, J. C. & Zabusky, N. J. 1987 Axisymmetrization and vorticity-gradient intensification of an isolated two-dimensional vortex through filamentation. J. Fluid Mech. 178, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, M. V., Zabusky, N. J. & McWilliams, J. C. 1988 Symmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: Causes and conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 305–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, P. 2001 Etude experimentale de deux tourbillons co-rotatifs. PhD dissertation, Université d'Aix-Marseille I, France.Google Scholar
Meunier, P., Ehrenstein, U., Leweke, T. & Rossi, M. 2002 A merging criterion for two-dimensional co-rotating vortices. Phys. Fluids 14, 2757–2766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, P., Le Dizes, S. & Leweke, T. 2005 Physics of vortex merging. CR Physique 6, 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, P. & Leweke, T. 2001 Three-dimensional instability during vortex merging. Phys. Fluids 13, 2747–2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, K. K. & Post, G. K. 1998 The structure and dynamics of vorticity and rate of strain in incompressible homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 377, 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomura, K. K., Tsutsui, H., Mahoney, D. & Rottman, J. W. 2006 Short-wavelength instability and decay of a vortex pair in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 553, 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overman, E. A. & Zabusky, N. J. 1982 Evolution and merger of isolated vortex structures. Phys. Fluids 25, 1297–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patnaik, P. C., Sherman, F. S. & Corcos, G. M. 1976 A numerical simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz waves of finite amplitude. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, G. & Armi, L. 1998 Vortex dynamics in a spatially accelerating shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 376, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, G. & Armi, L. 2000 Mixing and entrainment in developing stratified currents. J. Fluid Mech. 424, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protas, B., Babiano, A. & Kevlahan, N. K.-R. 1999 On geometrical alignment properties of two-dimensional forced turbulence. Physica D 128, 169–179.Google Scholar
Rossow, V. J. 1977 Convective merging of vortex cores in lift-generated wakes. J. Aircraft 14, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1992 Vortex Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. & Szeto, R. 1980 Equilibrium shapes of a pair of equal uniform vortices. Phys. Fluids 23, 2339–2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schowalter, D. G., VanAtta, C. W. Atta, C. W. & Lasheras, J. C. 1994 A study of streamwise vortex structure in a stratified shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 281, 247–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velasco Fuentes, O. U., 2005 Vortex filamentation: its onset and its role on axisymmetrization and merger. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 40, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar