Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Max U versus Humanomics: a critique of neo-institutionalism

  • DEIRDRE NANSEN McCLOSKEY (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

‘Institutions’ do not mean the same thing to Samuelsonian economists as they mean to other people. North's ‘rules of game’, like chess, dominates, even when it is claimed that ‘informal institutions’ are allowed into the tale. The tale is that institutions were once clotted, and then became unclotted, and the Great Enrichment occurred. But the enrichment was by a factor of upwards of a hundred, which cannot be explained by routine movements to an efficient equilibrium. And changes of institutions did not in fact happen much in England. Ethics changed, not laws and procedures. For presently poor countries, too, it will not suffice, as the World Bank and Acemoglu recommend, to add institutions and stir. Economies rely on ethics, which neo-institutionalists, being at heart Samuelsonian, have not wanted to admit. Ideas matter. Indeed, metaphors and stories matter, as in Searle's account.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Max U versus Humanomics: a critique of neo-institutionalism
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Max U versus Humanomics: a critique of neo-institutionalism
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Max U versus Humanomics: a critique of neo-institutionalism
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: deirdre2@uic.edu
References
Hide All
Acemoglu D. and Robinson J. A. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Crown Business.
Adams J. (1994), ‘Economy as Instituted Process: Change, Transformation, and Progress’, Journal of Economic Issues, 28: 331355.
Akerlof G. and Shiller R. (2009), Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Becker G. and Stigler G. (1977), ‘De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum’, American Economic Review, 67: 7690.
Boldrin M. and Levine D. K. (2008), Against Intellectual Monopoly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlos A. M. and Lewis F. D. (1999), ‘Property Rights, Competition, and Depletion in the Eighteenth-century Canadian Fur Trade: The Role of the European Market’, Canadian Journal of Economics Revue Canadienne d’Economique, 32: 705728.
Chamlee-Wright E. and Storr V. H. (eds.) (2010), The Political Economy of Hurricane Katrina and Community Rebound, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Coase R. and Wang N. (2013), How China Became Capitalist, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Coate D. (2010), ‘Disaster and Recovery: The Public and Private Sectors in the Aftermath of the 1906 Earthquake in San Francisco’, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey Working Paper.
Das G. (2009), The Difficulty of Being Good: On the Subtle Art of Dharma, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davis J. (2012), Medieval Market Morality: Life, Law and Ethics in the English Marketplace, 1200–1500, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Eagleton T. (2006), ‘Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching: Review of Dawkins, The God Delusion’, London Review of Books, October 19, pp. 32–34.
Fish S. (1980), Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fish S. (2001), How Milton Works, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fouquet R. and Pearson P. J. G. (2011), ‘The Long Run Demand for Lighting: Elasticities and Rebound Effects in Different Phases of Economic Development’, Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), Working Paper No. 6.
Gazzaniga M. S. (2011), Who's in Charge?: Free Will and the Science of the Brain, New York: Harper-Collins.
Geertz C., Geertz H. and Rosen L. (1979), Meaning and Order in Moroccan Society, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Greif A. (2006), Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grotius (Hugo de Groot) (1625), ‘Preliminary Discourse concerning the Certainty of Rights in General’, in De iure belli ac pacis. English trans. of 1738, from the French of Jean Barbeyrac, 1720. At Online Library of Liberty, http://oll.libertyfund.org.
Gwartney J., Lawson R. and Hall J. (2011), Economic Freedom of the World: 2011 Annual Report, Vancouver: Fraser Institute.
Hardin G. (1968), ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162: 12431248.
Hart D. M. and Richman S. (eds.) (2014), Discussion with Joel Mokyr, John Nye, and McCloskey of ‘Donald J. Boudreaux's “Deirdre McCloskey and Economist's Idea about Ideas” ’, Liberty Matters website, July. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. At http://oll.libertyfund.org/pages/mccloskey***conversation1.
Haskell T. L. (1999), ‘Responsibility, Convention, and the Role of Ideas in History’, in Coclanis P. A. and Bruchey S. (eds.), Ideas, Ideologies, and Social Movements: The United States Experience since 1800, Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 127.
Hiser R. F. (2003), ‘Moral Consequences of Institutional Structure’, Planning and Markets, 6 (1) At http://www-pam.usc.edu/.
Iannaccone L. (1998), ‘Introduction to the Economics of Religion’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36 (3): 14651495.
Kelling G. L. and Wilson J. Q. (1982), ‘Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety’, The Atlantic, 249: 2938.
Lachmann L. (1977), Capital, Expectations and the Market Process, Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel.
Maddison A. (2007), Contours of the World Economy, 1–2030 AD, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCloskey D. N. (1985), The Applied Theory of Price, New York: Macmillan.
McCloskey D. N. (1998), ‘Bourgeois Virtue and the History of P and S’, Journal of Economic History, 58: 297317.
McCloskey D. N. (2001), ‘Women's Work in the Market, 1900–2000’, in Zweiniger-Bargielowska I., (ed.), Women in Twentieth Century Britain: Economic, Social and Cultural Change, London: Longman/Pearson Education.
McCloskey D. N. (2008), ‘Not by P Alone: A Virtuous Economy’, Review of Political Economy, 20: 181197.
McCloskey D. N. (2010), Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCloskey D. N. (2015) (forthcoming), Bourgeois Equality: How Betterment Became Ethical, 1600–1848, and Then Suspect, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mokyr J. (2009), ‘Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and the Beginnings of Modern Economic Growth’, American Economic Review, 99 (2): 349355.
Mokyr J. (2010), ‘Culture, Institutions, and Modern Growth’, Conference on Understanding Institutions and Development Economics: The Legacy and Work of Douglass C. North, St. Louis, 4–6 Nov, 2010.
Mueller J. (1999), Capitalism, Democracy, and Ralph's Pretty Good Grocery, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nona M. P. and Storr V. H. (2012), ‘Talk Changes Things: The Implications of McCloskeys Bourgeois Dignity for Historical Inquiry’, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 41: 787791.
Nodharus W. D. (1996), ‘Do Real Output and Real Wage Measures Capture Reality? The History of Lighting Suggests Not. in Breshnahan T. F. and Gordon R. (eds.), The Economics of New Goods, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
North D. C. (1991), ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1): 97112.
North D. C. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Parks T. (2013), Italian Ways: On and Off the Rails from Milan to Palermo, New York and London: Norton.
Razafindrakoto M., Roubaud F. and Wachsberger J.-M. (2013), ‘Institutions, Gouvernance et Croissance de Long Terme à Madagascar: L’énigme et le Paradoxe’, Unpublished essay, Université Paris-Dauphine, UMR DIAL (Developpement Institutions & Mondialisation).
Rossi G. and Spagano S. (2014), ‘From Custom to Law – Hayek Revisited’, Unpublished essay Edinburgh School of Law and Department of Economics and business, University of Catania. At http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56643/.
Searle J. R. (2010), Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen A. (1977), ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6: 317344.
Tallis R. (2011), ‘Review of Deacon and Gazzanga’, Wall Street Journal November 12.
Tomasello M. (2014), A Natural History of Human Thinking, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Williamson O. (1999), ‘Public and Private Bureaucracies; A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15: 306342.
Wilson B. J. (2010), ‘Social Preferences Aren't Preferences’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73: 7782.
Zamagni S. (2010), ‘Catholic Social Thought, Civil Economy, and the Spirit of Capitalism’, in Finn D. K. (ed.), The True Wealth of Nations: Catholic Social Thought and Economic Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 6393.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Institutional Economics
  • ISSN: 1744-1374
  • EISSN: 1744-1382
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-institutional-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 70
Total number of PDF views: 675 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1059 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.