Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:27:49.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Free Trade Area or Common Capital Market? Notes on Mexico-US Economic Integration and Current NAFTA Negotiations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jaime Ros*
Affiliation:
Kellogg Institute of International Studies, University of Notre Dame

Extract

This Article addresses some of the key issues involved in understanding current trade negotiations between Mexico and the United States, as well as their significance for the process of economic integration in North America. These issues derive from the new setting produced by (a) Mexico's trade and investment liberalization in the 1980s, (b) the incentives which underlie the drive towards integration, as well as (c) those factors which will condition the final content of the current negotiating process.

A free trade agreement (FTA) with the United States could be seen as the logical conclusion of the process of trade and investment liberalization carried out by the Mexican government ever since the mid-1980s. At the same time, it also represents a shift in Mexico's initial trade strategy, from multilateralism to bilateralism, or from globalization to regionalization, as a consequence of the global trend, toward the end of the 20th century, to create large regional economic blocs.

Type
Two Views of the NAFTA
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, D. (1992) “The Impact of a North American Free Trade Area: Applied General Equilibrium Models.” Paper presented at the Brookings Institution workshop on “NAFTA: An Assessment of the Research,” Washington (DC), 9-10 April.Google Scholar
Brown, D., A. Deardorff, and R. Stern (1991) "A North American Free Trade Agreement: Analytical Issues and a Computational Assessment." Unpublished manuscriptGoogle Scholar
Cameron, M. (1991) “ North American Trade Negotiations: Liberal-ization Games between Asymmetric Players.Paper present at the XV World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Buenos Aires (Argentina), 21-25 July.Google Scholar
Cameron, M., L. Eden, and M. Molot (1992) "North American Free Trade: Cooperation and Conflict in Canada-Mexico Relations." Unpublished manuscriptCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. (1987) “Issues of Strategic Trade Policy for Small Countries.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics: 349367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia Rocha, A. and Kehoe, T. (1991) “Efectos del Tratado de Libre Comercio sobre la Economía Mexicana,” pp. 199240 in Secretaría de Comercio y Fomento Industrial (SECOFI) (eds.) Hacia un Tratado de Libre Comercio en América del Norte. Míxico (DF), Míxico: Editorial Porrua.Google Scholar
Helleiner, G. (1991) “Consideraciones sobre un área de libre comercio entre Estados Unidos y México,” in Vega, G. (coordinador) México ante el Libre Comercio con América del Norte. México (DF), M6xico: El Colegio de México and the Universidad Tecnolégica de México.Google Scholar
Hernandez Laos, E. (1990) Política de desarrollo industrial y evolución de la productividad total de los factores en la industria manufacturera mexicana. Informe presentado al Fondo de Estudios Ricardo J. Zevada, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Ixtapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
Hinojosa, R., and Robinson, S. (1991) “Alternative Scenarios of US-Mexico Integration: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach” (Working Paper 609). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G., and Schott, J. (1992) Prospects for North American Free Trade. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics (HE).Google Scholar
Interindustry Economic Research Fund. (1991) INFORUM Report: Industrial Effects of a Free Trade Agreement between Mexico and the USA. College Park, MD: Interindustry Economic Research Fund Inc. Google Scholar
Kehoe, T. (1991) “Modeling the Dynamic Impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement.” Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota-Minneapolis, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Kessel, G. and Samaniego, R. (1991) Apertura comercial, productividad y desarrollo tecnológico. El caso de México. Reporte final elaborado para el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington, DC, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.Google Scholar
de Mateo, (1988) “La Política Comercial de México y el GATT.” El Trimestre Econémico LV, 217 (enero-marzo): 175216.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. (1992) Multifactor Productivity Growth in Mexico: Some Notes on Recent Research (Mimeo). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. (1988) The Motor-Vehicle Industry in Mexico in the Eighties. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Organization (ILO).Google Scholar
Ojedo, M. (1991) “El cambiante contexto internacional a finales del segundo milenio,” pp. 1524 in Secofi, (eds.) Hacia un tratado de libre comercio en America del Norte. México (DF), México: Editorial Porrúa.Google Scholar
Pastor, R. (1992) “The North American Free Trade Agreement as the Center of an Integration Process: The Non-trade Issues.Paper presented at the Brookings Institution workshop on “NAFTA: An Assessment of the Research,” Washington (DC), 9-10 April.Google Scholar
KPMG Peat Marwick/Policy Economics Group (1991) “The Effects of a Free Trade Agreement between the US and Mexico.” Washington, DC: US Council of the Mexico-US Business Committee/Council of the Americas. Google Scholar
Peres, W. (1990a) “From Globalization to Regionalization: The Mexican Case” (Technical Paper 24). Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
Peres, W. (1990b) Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Development in Mexico. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
Roland-Host, D., K. Reinert, and C. Shiells (1992) "North American Trade Liberalization and the Role of Non-tariff Barriers." Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ros, J. (1992a) “Ajuste macroeconómico, reformas estructurales y crecimiento en México.” Report prepared for the project on “The Role of the State in Latin America,” sponsored by the Centro Español de Estudios de América Latina (CEDEAL).Google Scholar
Ros, J. (1992b) “Mexico's trade and industrialization experiencsince 1960: a reconsideration of past policies and assessment of current reforms.” Report prepared for the WIDER/UNU project on “Trade and Industrialization Reconsidered,” Helsinki (Finland), World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER).Google Scholar
Sobarzo, H. (1991) Análisis de los efectos de un Tratado de Libre Comercio entre México y America del Norte: Un enfoque de Equilibrio General. México (DF), México: El Colegio de Méxicom Centro de Estudios Económicos.Google Scholar
Ten Kate, A., and de Mateo, F. (1989) “Apertura Comercial y Protección.” Comercio Exterior (abril): 312329.Google Scholar
Tybout, J. and Westbrook, D. (1992) Trade LiberalizaUon and the Structure of Production in Mexican Industries (Working paper no. 92-03, April)., Department of Economics, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
US International Trade Commission (US-ITC) (1990) Review of Trade and Liberalization Measures by Mexico and Prospects for Future Unite States-Mexican Relations, Phase I. Washington, DC: Office of the US International Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Weintraub, S. (1992) “NAFTA and Industry.” Paper presented at the Brookings Institution workshop on “NAFTA: An Assessment of the Research,” Washington, DC, 9-10 April.Google Scholar
Young, L. and J. Romero (1992) "Steady Growth and Transitionin a Dynamic Dual Model of the North American Free Trade Agreement." Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Zabludovsky, J. (1990) “Trade Liberalization and Macroeconomic Adjustment,” in Brothers, D.S. and Wick, A.E. (eds.) Mexico's Search for a New Development Strategy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar