Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-v9bzm Total loading time: 0.235 Render date: 2023-02-07T20:40:17.407Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Judicial Behavior under Austerity: An Empirical Analysis of Behavioral Changes in the Portuguese Constitutional Court, 2002–2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2022

Susana Coroado
Affiliation:
University of Lisbon
Nuno Garoupa*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University and Católica Global School of Law
Pedro C. Magalhães
Affiliation:
University of Lisbon
*
Contact the corresponding author, Nuno Garoupa, at nunogaroupa@law.tamu.edu.

Abstract

The austerity policies pursued in several countries during the Eurozone crisis began to call attention to the role played by courts as relevant actors in the context of budgetary and financial stress. The case of the Portuguese Constitutional Court has often been singled out in national and international forums as one characterized by particularly intense activism in this respect. Allegedly, political conflict around austerity policies and the demand for their judicial review had fundamentally changed the role of the Portuguese Constitutional Court and the behavior of its judges. However, after examining these claims empirically, we find that, when properly assessed with scrutiny of comparable legislation in other periods, the judicial behavior on austerity policies exhibits a much less exceptional pattern than often argued. Constitutional review in Portugal seems to respond to institutional arrangements (i.e., those fostering a central role for ideological preferences and party loyalty) and not to specific business cycles.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2017 by the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to two anonymous referees, David Klein, António Araújo, Joaquim Pedro Cardoso da Costa, Pedro Lomba, Gonçalo Almeida Ribeiro, José Sousa e Brito, and Católica Global School of Law seminar participants for helpful suggestions. The data set assembled by the authors for use in this article is available at http://www.apis.ics.ulisboa.pt. The usual disclaimers apply.

References

Afonso, António, Jorge Caiado, and Miguel St. Aubyn. 2015. “The Macro Impact of the Portuguese Constitutional Court Decisions Regarding the Budgetary Proposals of the Portuguese Budget Law, 2012, 2013, 2014.” Working Paper WP06/2015/DE/UECE/CEMAPRE, Lisbon School of Economics and Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amaral-Garcia, Sofia, Nuno Garoupa, and Veronica Grembi. 2009. “Judicial Independence and Party Politics in the Kelsenian Constitutional Courts: The Case of Portugal.Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6:383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Ryan, Catherine de Vries, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, Jan Rovny, Marco Steenbergen, and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2015. “Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010.Party Politics 21:143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camões, Pedro J., Silvia M. Mendes, and Michael D. McDonald. 2002. “The Dimensionality of the Portuguese Party Policy Space.” NEAPP Working Paper 4, Universidade do Minho. http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/3306?locale=en.Google Scholar
Canotilho, Mariana, Teresa Violante, and Rui Lanceiro. 2015. “Austerity Measures under Judicial Scrutiny: The Portuguese Constitutional Case-Law.European Constitutional Law Review 11:155–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cisotta, Roberto, and Daniella Gallo. 2013. “The Portuguese Constitutional Court, the Social Side-Effects of the Austerity Measures and the Respect of International and European Constraints.Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale 2:465–80.Google Scholar
Dimopoulos, Andreas. 2013. “PIGS and Pearls: State of Economic Emergency, Right to Resistance and Constitutional Review in the Context of the Eurozone Crisis.Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 7:501–20.Google Scholar
do Rosário, Daniel. 2013. “Tribunal Constitucional é ‘Ativista.’” Expresso, October 8.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee. 2016. “Some Thoughts on the Study of Judicial Behavior.William and Mary Law Review 57:2017–73.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Eric Posner. 2016. “Supreme Court Justices’ Loyalty to the President.Journal of Legal Studies 45:401–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, Federico. 2014. “The Euro-Crisis and the Courts: Judicial Review and the Political Process in Comparative Perspective.Berkeley Journal of International Law 32:64–123.Google Scholar
Feld, Lars P., and Stefan Voigt. 2005. “Judicial Independence and Economic Growth: Some Proposals Regarding the Judiciary.” In Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence, ed. R. D. Congleton and B. Swedenborg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fernandes, José Manuel. 2014a. “A Biblioteca do Tribunal Constitucional e aquilo que os Juízes não Deviam Ser.” Observador, May 26.Google Scholar
Fernandes, José Manuel. 2014b. “Desta vez o Acórdão do TC foi Sincero: Os Juízes têm um Programa Ideológico.” Observador, May 31.Google Scholar
Garoupa, Nuno. 2017. “Constitutional Review.” In Oxford Handbook of Public Choice, ed. R. D. Congleton, B. Grofman, and S. Voigt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanretty, Chris. 2012. “Dissent in Iberia: The Ideal Points of Justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Court.European Journal of Political Research 51:671–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., and James F. Spriggs II. 2006. The Politics of Precedent on the US Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinarejos, Alicia. 2015. “The Role of Courts in the Wake of the Eurozone Crisis.” In Beyond the Crisis: The Governance of Europe’s Economic, Political and Legal Transformation, ed. Mark Dawson, Henrik Enderlein, and Christian Joerges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jornal de Negócios. 2013. “Draghi com Críticas ao Tribunal Constitucional e Elogios a Portugal no Parlamento Europeu.” Jornal de Negócios, December 16.Google Scholar
Jornal I. 2014. “PSD-Madeira quer nova Constituição e menos Deputados.” Jornal I, June 25.Google Scholar
Khalip, Andrei, and Sérgio Gonçalves. 2013. “Portugal Court Rejects Some Government Austerity Measures.” Reuters, April 5.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, Claire. 2015a. “Constitutions, Social Rights and Sovereign Debt States in Europe: A Challenging New Area of Constitutional Inquiry.” Department of Law Research Paper 2015/34, European University Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpatrick, Claire. 2015b. “On the Rule of Law and Economic Emergency: The Degradation of Basic Legal Values in Europe’s Bailouts.Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35:325–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koukiadaki, Aristea. 2014. “Can the Austerity Measures Be Challenged in Supranational Courts? The Cases of Greece and Portugal.” Report for ETUC, University of Manchester. https://www.etuc.org/sites/www.etuc.org/files/publication/files/austerity_greeceportugal_en_3.pdf.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopes-de-Silanes, Christian Pop-Eleches, and Andrei Shleifer. 2004. “Judicial Checks and Balances.Journal of Political Economy 112:445–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina. 2009. “Dissent in a Party-Based Parliament: The Portuguese Case.Party Politics 15:695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maatsch, Aleksandra. 2014. “Are We All Austerians Now? An Analysis of National Parliamentary Parties’ Positioning on Anti-crisis Measures in the Eurozone.Journal of European Public Policy 21:96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, Pedro C. 2014. “The Elections of the Great Recession in Portugal: Performance Voting under a Blurred Responsibility for the Economy.Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24:180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda, Elisabete, and Catarina Almeida Pereira. 2013. “Constitucional deixou passar 80% da austeridade.” Jornal de Negócios, November 27.Google Scholar
Miranda, Jorge, Paulo Otero, and Bacelar Gouveia. 2013. “Reacções ao chumbo do Tribunal Constitucional.” Jornal de Notícias, April 5.Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo, and Mario Quaranta. 2016. “What Is the Impact of the Economic Crisis on Democracy? Evidence from Europe.International Political Science Review 37:618–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Observador. 2015. “Presidente Deve Ter um Papel ‘Mais Interventivo’ na Escolha dos Juízes do TC.” Observador, May 21.Google Scholar
Pereira, José Pacheco. 2013. “Não é ‘defender’ a Constituição, é ‘defender’ o Tribunal Constitucional.” Público, November 16.Google Scholar
Pereira Coutinho, Francisco. 2013. “A Natureza Jurídica dos Memorandos da Troika.Themis 24/25:147–79.Google Scholar
Pereira Coutinho, Francisco. 2016. “Austerity on the Loose in Portugal: European Judicial Restraint in Times of Crisis.Perspectives on Federalism 8: E105–E132. http://on-federalism.eu/attachments/249_download.pdf.Google Scholar
Pessoa, Luiz. 2013. “Will the Constitutional Court Put at Risk the MOU Implementation?” Political report, DG Communication, Lisbon, October 15.Google Scholar
Reis Novais, Jorge. 2014. Em Defesa do Tribunal Constitucional: Resposta ao Críticos. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Gonçalo de Almeida. 2013. “Judicial Activism against Austerity in Portugal.” Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law and ConstitutionMaking.org. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2013/12/judicial-activism-against-austerity-in-portugal/.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Gonçalo de Almeida, and Luís Pereira Coutinho, eds. 2014. O Tribunal Constitucional e a Crise: Ensaios Críticos. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Sajó, András. 1996. “How the Rule of Law Killed Hungarian Welfare Reform.East European Constitutional Review 5:31–41.Google Scholar
Santos, Ana Catarina. 2011. O Tribunal Constitucional, 1983–2008: Contributos para o Estudo do Tribunal Constitucional, seu Papel Político e Politização do Comportamento Judicial em Portugal. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Saraiva, José António. 2015. “A Reputação do Tribunal Constitucional.” Semanário Sol, May 4.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Rafael Gely. 2007. “Strategic Judicial Decision Making.” NBER Working Paper 13321, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TSF. 2014a. “Passos Coelho diz que Juízes do Constitucional Têm de Ser Mais Bem Escolhidos.” TSF, June 6.Google Scholar
TSF. 2014b. “PSD foi Iludido pelos Juízes que Indicou para o Tribunal Constitucional.” TSF, June 10.Google Scholar
Wise, Peter. 2014. “Portugal Court Ruling on Austerity Measures Threatens Tax Rises.” Financial Times, June 1.Google Scholar
8
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Judicial Behavior under Austerity: An Empirical Analysis of Behavioral Changes in the Portuguese Constitutional Court, 2002–2016
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Judicial Behavior under Austerity: An Empirical Analysis of Behavioral Changes in the Portuguese Constitutional Court, 2002–2016
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Judicial Behavior under Austerity: An Empirical Analysis of Behavioral Changes in the Portuguese Constitutional Court, 2002–2016
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *