Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Daniel Philpott (a1) and Timothy Samuel Shah (a2)

Not so very long ago, the idea of religious freedom enjoyed all the self-evident virtue of a Norman Rockwell painting. Sure, Americans disagreed about what it meant in practice, leaving their Supreme Court to hash out the details. Still, however Americans differed in their religious beliefs, they espoused religious freedom and insisted that it cannot be government's job to promote any one religious sect over others or coerce anyone's conscience in religious matters. “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation,” thundered Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson in 1943, “it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.”1 For a time, this consensus seemed poised to embrace the entire world. When in November 1949 Eleanor Roosevelt proudly held up for public view a poster-size copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, including its article on “freedom of thought, conscience and religion,” one might have been forgiven for thinking that all the peoples of the earth were ready to follow her matronly instruction.2

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Saba Mahmood and Peter Danchin , eds., “Contested Genealogies of Religious Freedom,” special issue, South Atlantic Quarterly 113, no. 1 (2014)

Talal Asad , “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz,” Man 18, no. 2, (1983): 251

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Law and Religion
  • ISSN: 0748-0814
  • EISSN: 2163-3088
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 141
Total number of PDF views: 169 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 560 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 18th January 2017 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.