Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:59:33.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating geospatial models of the diffusion of morphosyntactic innovations: The Welsh strong second-person singular pronoun chdi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

David Willis
David Willis*
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge
*
*Address for correspondence: Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA, United Kingdom, Tel.: +44 1223 335885, dwew2@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Morphosyntactic dialect variation, once a neglected area of dialect research, has recently witnessed a large growth in interest. Various methods from geospatial data analysis have been applied to morphosyntactic data. To date, the focus has largely been on analyzing the distribution of stable patterns of variation. This article extends this work to examine patterns of ongoing change. It uses a body of data from the Syntactic Atlas of Welsh Dialects and the Siarad Corpus of spoken Welsh to examine the innovation and diffusion of a new second-person singular pronoun, chdi, testing the usefulness of Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) as a method for identifying and modeling patterns of ongoing syntactic change. It is shown that GWR provides plausible models of the diachronic development of changes that are still in progress. Furthermore, it allows us to test whether rates of change are constant across geographical space, allowing us to test whether the Constant Rate Hypothesis (that diffusion of change proceeds at the same rate in different environments) holds between dialects.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistic Geography , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 2017 , pp. 41 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of Primary Sources

Edwards, Thomas (Twm o’r Nant). 1874. Gwaith Thomas Edwards: Gwaith Twm o’r Nant. Liverpool: I. Foulkes.Google Scholar
Evans, Beriah Gwynfe. 1898. Dafydd Dafis. Wrexham: Hughes a’i Fab.Google Scholar
Lewis, Lewis William (Llew Llwyfo). [n.d.]. Cyfrinach Cwm Erfin. Liverpool: I. Foulkes.Google Scholar
Lewis, Lewis William (Llew Llwyfo). 1860. Huw Huws. Caergybi [Holyhead]: L. Jones.Google Scholar
Owen, Daniel. 1891. Enoc Huws. Wrexham: Hughes & Son.Google Scholar
Rees, William (Gwilym Hiraethog). 1853. Aelwyd f’Ewythr Robert. Dinbych [Denbigh]: Thomas Gee.Google Scholar
Rees, William (Gwilym Hiraethog). 1940 [1877]. Helyntion bywyd hen deiliwr. Aberystwyth: Y Clwb Llyfrau Cymraeg.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kate. 1936. Traed mewn cyffion. Aberystwyth: Gwasg Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Stowe, Harriet Beecher. 1853. Caban f’Ewyrth Twm. Llundain [London]: J. Cassell.Google Scholar
All other textual citations are derived from Early English Books Online (EEBO, http://eebo.chadwyck.com), Eighteenth Century Collections Online (ECCO, http://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco) or Welsh Newspapers Online (Beta) (http://papuraunewyddcymru.llgc.org.uk).Google Scholar

References

Altmann, Gabriel, Buttlar, Haro von, Rott, Walter & Strauss, Udo. 1983. A law of change in language. In Barron Brainerd (ed.), Historical linguistics, 104-115. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1990. The structure of drift. In Henning Andersen & Konrad Koerner (eds.), Historical linguistics 1987: Papers from the 8th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (8. ICHL) (Lille, 31 August–4 September 1987), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Awbery, Gwenllïan Mair. 1976. The syntax of Welsh: A transformational study of the passive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Awbery, Gwenllïan Mair. 2012. Welsh language wills and inventories: Exploring dialect variation in the past. Studia Celtica 46. 137-164.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973. Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan & Sand, Lori. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3(3). 241-264.Google Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Wikle, Tom, Tillery, Jan & Sand, Lori. 1993. Some patterns of linguistic diffusion. Language Variation and Change, 5(3). 359-390.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J. 1988. Variation in the use of initial consonant mutation. In Martin J. Ball (ed.), The use of Welsh, 70-81. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J. & Müller, Nicole. 1992. Mutation in Welsh. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef. 2005. Word order variation in three-verb clusters and the division of labour between generative linguistics and sociolinguistics. In Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan (eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social, 233-264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Auwera, Johan van der, Bennis, Hans, Boef, Eefje, Vogelaer, Gunther De & Ham, Margreet van der. 2008. Syntactische atlas van de nederlandse dialecten, deel II: Syntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects, volume II. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Bennis, Hans, Vogelaer, Gunther De, Devos, Magda & Ham, Margreet van der. 2005. Syntactische atlas van de nederlandse dialecten, deel I: Syntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects, volume I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2007. The ASIS enterprise: A view on the construction of a syntactic atlas for the northern Italian dialects. Nordlyd 34. 35-52.Google Scholar
Blythe, Richard A. & Croft, William. 2012. S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 88(2). 269-304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. 2009. On the superficiality of Welsh agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(2). 225-265.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D, Tallerman, Maggie & Willis, David. 2007. The syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2013. Space, diffusion and mobility. In J. K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, 471-500. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brunsdon, Chris, Fotheringham, A. Stewart & Charlton, Martin. 1999. Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression. Journal of Regional Science 39(3). 497-524.Google Scholar
Bucheli, Claudia & Glaser, Elvira. 2002. The Syntactic Atlas of Swiss German Dialects: Empirical and methodological problems. In Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic microvariation, 41-74. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Alvanides, Seraphim. 2013. Employing geographical principles for sampling in state of the art dialectological projects. Journal of Linguistic Geography 1(2). 96-114.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. 1972. The time dimension: Contribution toward a theory of sound change. Foundations of Language 8(4). 457-498.Google Scholar
Cheng, Chin-Chuan & Wang, William S.-Y.. 1977. Tone change in Chao-zhou Chinese: A study in lexical diffusion. In William S.-Y. Wang (ed.), The lexicon in phonological change, 86-100. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Coombes, Mike & Bond, Steve. 2008. Travel-to-work areas: The 2007 review. Newport: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van. 2014. Reverse dialectometry: Geography as a probe into linguistic theory. Paper presented at the Maps and Grammar workshop, Meertens Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 2003. Log(ist)ic and simplistic S-curves. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 54-70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret, Davies, Peredur, Herring, Jon Russell, Parafita Couto, M. Carmen & Carter, Diana. 2014. Building bilingual corpora. In Enlli Môn Thomas & Ineke Mennen (eds.), Advances in the study of bilingualism, 93-111. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo. 2009. On (some of) the uses of a syntactic atlas. Tinta: E-journal of Hispanic and Lusophone Studies 8(2). 1-24.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, A. Stewart, Brunsdon, Chris & Charlton, Martin. 2002. Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fruehwald, Josef, Gress-Wright, Jonathan & Wallenberg, Joel C.. 2013. Phonological rule change: The constant rate effect. In Seda Kan, Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds.), NELS 40: Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1, 219–230. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.Google Scholar
Glaser, Elvira & Bart, Gabriela. 2011. Discovering and mapping syntactic areas: Old and new methods. In Xosé Afonso Álvarez Pérez, Ernestina Carrilho & Catarina Magro (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Limits and Areas in Dialectology (LimiAr), 345–363. Lisbon: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Gollini, Isabella, Lu, Binbin, Charlton, Martin, Brunsdon, Christopher & Harris, Paul. 2013. GWmodel: An R package for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models. arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0413.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, Torsten. 1967. Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert & Nerbonne, John. 2001. Dialect areas and dialect continua. Language Variation and Change 13(3). 375-400.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2004. Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 8(1). 47-69.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Priestley, Joel, Hagen, Kristin, Åfarli, Tor Anders & Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2009. The Nordic Dialect Corpus: An advanced research tool. In Kristiina Jokinen & Eckhard Bick (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2009, 73–80. Tartu: Northern European Association for Language Technology. http://dspace.utlib.ee/dspace/handle/10062/9206.Google Scholar
Jones, Mari C. 1998. Language obsolescence and revitalization: Linguistic change in two sociolinguistically contrasting Welsh communities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3). 199-244.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language, 83(2). 344-387.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of linguistic change: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morris-Jones, John. 1913. A Welsh grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nakaya, Tomoki. 2014 [2009]. GWR4 user manual. https://geodacenter.asu.edu/drupal_files/gwr/GWR4manual.pdf Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles E. & Sebeok, Thomas A.. (eds.). 1954. Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Paolillo, John. 2011. Independence claims in linguistics. Language Variation and Change 23(2). 257-274.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2009. The loss of OV order in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 249-278. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sadler, Louisa. 1988. Welsh syntax: A Government-Binding approach. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die verwantschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen sprachen. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau.Google Scholar
Séguy, Jean. 1971. La relation entre la distance spatiale et la distance lexicale. Revue de Linguistique Romane 35. 335-357.Google Scholar
Spruit, Marco René. 2008. Quantitative perspectives on syntactic variation in Dutch dialects. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2012. Grammatical variation in British English dialects: A study in corpus-based dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan Richard. 1972. Derivational complexity in varieties of contemporary spoken Welsh. Word 28. 166-186.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3(2). 215-246.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95-195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Glyn. 1987. Bilingualism, class dialect and social reproduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 66. 85-98.Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2007. Specifier-to-head reanalyses in the complementizer domain: Evidence from Welsh. Transactions of the Philological Society, 105(3). 432-480.Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2009. Old and Middle Welsh. In Martin Ball & Nicole Müller (eds.), The Celtic languages, 117-160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2012. Negative polarity and the quantifier cycle: Comparative perspectives from European languages. In Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds.), The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen cycle, 313-356. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Willis, David & Mittendorf, Ingo. 2004. Ein historisches Korpus der kymrischen Sprache. In Erich Poppe (ed.), Keltologie heute: Themen und Fragestellungen, 135-142. Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2003. Dialectology and linguistic diffusion. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 713-735. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar