Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:02:44.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asaf Bachrach & Andrew Nevins (eds.), Inflectional identity (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 18). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. xiv+366.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2009

Jason D. Haugen
Jason D. Haugen*
Affiliation:
Williams College
*
Author's address: Program in Linguistics, Williams College, 85 Mission Park Dr., Williamstown, MA 01267, USAjason.d.haugen@williams.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , July 2009 , pp. 435 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the Principle of Contrast. Language 70.4, 737–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart & Ueda, Isao. 2006. Prosodic vs. morphological mora augmentation. Lexicon Forum 2, 121–143.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2005. Optimal Paradigms. In Downing, Laura J., Hall, T. A. & Raffelsiefen, Renate (eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 1992. A unified analysis of cross-linguistic morphological gemination. Proceedings of ConSOLE 1, 265–283. [ROA 149-1096]Google Scholar