Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Raising, inversion and agreement in modern Hebrew 1


This paper focuses on the interaction between raising, subject–verb inversion and agreement in Modern Hebrew. It identifies, alongside ‘standard’ (i.e., English-like) subject-to-subject raising, two additional patterns where the embedded subject appears post-verbally. In one, the raising predicate exhibits long-distance agreement with the embedded subject, while in the other, a colloquial variant, it is marked with impersonal (3sm) agreement. The choice between the three raising constructions in the language is shown to be solely dependent on properties of the embedded clause. The data are discussed and analyzed against a background of typological and theoretical work on raising. The analysis, cast in the framework of Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG), builds on research on raising, selectional locality, agreement, subjecthood and information structure, as well as verb-initial constructions in Modern Hebrew.

Corresponding author
Author’s address: The Open University of Israel, Department of Literature, Language and the Arts, Raanana, 4353701, Israel
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Marco Baroni , Silvia Bernardini , Adriano Ferraresi  & Eros Zanchetta . 2009. The WaCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation 43.3, 209226;

Ruth A. Berman 1980. The case of an (S)VO language: Subjectless constructions in Modern Hebrew. Language 56.4, 759776.

Robert D. Borsley 1995. On some similarities and differences between Welsh and Syrian Arabic. Linguistics 33, 99122.

Miriam Butt . 2014. Control vs. complex predication: Identifying non-finite complements. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32, 165190.

William D. Davies  & Stanley Dubinsky . 2004. The grammar of raising and control: A course in syntactic argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell.

Jonathan Ginzburg  & Ivan A. Sag . 2000. Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Ilan Hazout . 1994. The Hebrew pronoun ze and the syntax of sentential subjects. Lingua 93.4, 265282.

Pauline Jacobson . 1990. Raising as function composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 13.4, 423476.

Tibor Kiss . 1995. Infinite komplementation. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Knud Lambrecht . 2000. When subjects behave like objects: An analysis of the merging of S and O in sentence-focus constructions. Studies in Language 24.3, 611682.

Idan Landau . 2011. Predication vs. aboutness in copy raising. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29.3, 779813.

Chris Manning  & Ivan A. Sag . 1998. Argument structure, valence, and binding. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 21, 107144.

Nurit Melnik . 2006. A constructional approach to verb-initial constructions in Modern Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics 17.2, 153198.

Maria Polinsky  & Eric Potsdam . 2006. Expanding the scope of control and raising. Syntax 9.2, 171192.

Luigi Rizzi . 1982. Issues in Italian syntax, vol. 11. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.

Ivan A. Sag 2010. Feature geometry and predictions of locality. In Greville Corbett  & Anna Kibort (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on features, 236271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 81 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 194 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.