Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T13:55:14.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of tempo and stress on German syllable structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Christiane Laeufer
Christiane Laeufer
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A comprehensive view of German syllable structure is developed based on phonetic and psycholinguistic experimental results supplemented by phonological arguments. The account is based on the interaction between universal factors (sonority/strength constraints, effects of tempo) and language-specific factors (phonotactic constraints, effects of stress). Initial, phonological syllabification reveals the distributional constraints operating in the language. This syllabification is modified by stress and rate of speech in well defined ways. The effect of a faster tempo is to maximize and thus strengthen syllable onsets within the limits predicted by sonority/strength and to minimize and thus weaken codas. This is achieved through resyllabification of stronger consonants onto following weaker ones. The effect of stress is twofold. Stress blocks faster speech resyllabification. It also modifies initial syllabification by making stressed syllables heavier through the acquisition of a branching nucleus, and in faster tempos, a branching rhyme. The effects of syllabification adjustments due to tempo and stress are interpreted as an optimization of syllable structure. The study supports a theory of syllable structure based on the arrangement of segments according to the so-called Sonority Sequencing Principle augmented by language-specific constraints which, in the absence of counteracting factors such as stress, are relaxed in faster tempos.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , September 1995 , pp. 227 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, John M. (1986). Suprasegmental dependencies. In Durand, Jacques (ed.) Dependency and nonlinear phonology. London: Croon Helm. 55–133.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Jones, Charles. (1977). Historical English phonology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. (1984). A metrical interpretation of some traditional claims about quantity and stress. In Aronoff, & Oerle, (eds.). 83–106.Google Scholar
Anderson, Sven & Port, Robert. (1994). Evidence for syllable structure, stress and juncture from segmental durations. Journal of Phonetics 22, 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Oerle, Richard T. (eds.) (1984). Language sound structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aussprachewörterbuch. (Duden) (1974). Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. (1978). Gradience in English syllabification and a revised concept of unmarked syllabization. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan E. (1975). If speakers can't count syllables, what can they do? Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan E. (1976). The distributional syllable. In Juilland, (ed.). 248–261.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni. (1990). Topics in the lexical phonology of English. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Boucher, Victor. (1988). A parameter of syllabification for V-Stop-V and relative-timing invariance. Journal of Phonetics 16. 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.) Papers in laboratory phonology I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 283–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel J. (1983). CV-phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. (1939). L'e muet dans la coupe syllabique. Le Français Moderne 7.2. 154–158.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. (1940). Tendances de coupe syllabique en français. Publications of the Modern Language Association 55.2. 579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. (1964). Comparing the consonantal features of English, German, Spanish and French. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2.3. 155–205.Google Scholar
Derwing, Bruce L., Cho, Whan Sook & Wang, H. Samuel. (1991). A cross-linguistic experimental investigation of syllable structure: some preliminary results. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Aix-en-Provence: University of Provence. 110–113.Google Scholar
Derwing, Bruce L. & Nearey, Terrance M. (1991). The ‘vowel-stickness’ phenomenon: three experimental sources of evidence. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Aix-en-Provence: University of Provence.Google Scholar
DochertyGerard, J. Gerard, J. (1987). The timing of voicing in British English consonant clusters as a function of medial boundary status. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Tallin: Tallin University Press. 134–137.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. (1972). Allegroregeln rechtfertigen Lentoregeln. Innsbruck: Institut für vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jøgensen, Eli. (1941). Neuere Beiträge zum Quantitäts-Problem. Acta Linguistics 2. 175–181.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli & Jøgensen, Hans P. (1970). Close and loose contact (AnschluB) with special reference to north German. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen 4. 43–80.Google Scholar
Fliflet, Albert L. (1962). Einige Beobachtungen über AnschluB und Silbe. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. The Hague: Mouton. 610–616.Google Scholar
Fliflet, Albert L. (1963). Syllable type and syllable perception. Phonetica 10. 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, Eric C. (1969). Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5. 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, Eric C. (1976). Phonotactics and the syllable. In Juilland, (ed.). 381–398.Google Scholar
Garde, Paul. (1968). L'Accent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Garding, Eva. (1967). Internal juncture in Swedish. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Gay, Thomas. (1981). Mechanisms in the control of speech rate. Phonetica 38. 148–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giegerich, Heinz J. (1985). Metrical phonology and phonological structure: German and English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. (1989). Syllable structure and lexical derivation in German. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. (1992). Onset maximization in German: the case against resyllabification rules. In Eisenberg, Peter, Ramers, Karl Heinz & Vater, Heinz (eds.) Silbenphonologie des Deutschen. Tübingen: Günter Narr. 134–171.Google Scholar
Grammont, Maurice. (1933). Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. (1965). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant sequences. Linguistics 18. 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, Margaret van Peenen. (1983). Segmental processes, prosody, and their interaction in the Bruxellois dialect of French. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Hála, Bohuslav. (1961). La syllabe, sa nature, son origine et ses transformations. Orbis 10. 60–143.Google Scholar
Hall, Tracy A. (1992). Syllable structure and syllable-related processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: a nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Language 48. 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1978). Constraints on schwa deletion in English. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.) Recent developments in historical phonology. The Hague: Mouton. 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Halle, Morris. (1956). Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. (1904). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Juilland, Alphonse (ed.) (1976). Linguistic studies offered to J. Greenberg. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1970). Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7. 69–98.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 421–441.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. (1981). Remarks on the metrical structure of the syllable. In: Dressler, Wolfgang U., Pfeiffer, Oskar E. & Rennison, John R. (eds.) Phonologica 1980. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. 245–256.Google Scholar
Kloeke, Wilhelm U. S. van Lessen. (1982). Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie. Merkmale und Markiertheit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J. (1974). Koartikulation und Steurung im Deutschen. In Engel, Ulrich & Grebe, Paul (eds.) Sprachsystem und Sprachgebrauch. Düsseldorf: Schwann. 172–192.Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J. (1976). Die Instabilität wortfinaler Alveolarplosive im Deutschen. Phonetica 33. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J. (1977). Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen. München: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus J. (1979). Parameters in the production and the perception of plosives in German and French. Arbeitsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik, University of Kiel 12. 261–292.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. (1948). Contribution à la théorie de la syllabe. Bulletin de la Société Polonaise de Linguistique 8. 80–114.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. (1982). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Laeufer, Christiane. (1983). The syllable and syllabification in German: an autosegmental approach. Ms., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Laeufer, Christiane. (1985). Some language-specific and universal aspects of syllable structure and syllabification: evidence from French and German. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Laeufer, Christiane. (1989). French linking, English flapping, and the relation between syntax and phonology. In Kirschner, Carl & Decesaris, Janet (eds.) Studies in Romance linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laeufer, Christiane. (1990). Syllabification and resyllabification in French. In Wanner, Dieter & Kibbee, Douglas (eds.) New analyses in Romance linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 19–36.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Llse. (1960). An acoustic-phonetic study of internal open juncture. Phonetica 5. 1–54 (supplement).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, Llse. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn. (1983). Economy of speech gestures. In Macneilage, Peter F. (ed.) The production of speech. Berlin: Springer Verlag. 217–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. (1985). Phonetic clues to syllabification. In Fromkin, Victoria (ed.) Phonetic linguistics: essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 203–221.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. (1955). The phonetic basis for syllable division. Studia Linguistica 9. 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William G. (1956). Syllable nuclei and final consonant clusters in German. In Halle, Morris, Lunt, Horace G. & McLean, Hugh (eds.) For Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton. 372–381.Google Scholar
Moulton, William G. (1962). The sounds of English and German. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pickett, James M. (1982). The sounds of speech communication. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan S. (1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry II. 511–562.Google Scholar
Prokopowa, Larissa. (1987). Artikulatorische Korrelate des festen und losen Anschlusses im Deutschen. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R. 300–303.Google Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. (1939). A comparative Germanic grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. (1970). Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rialland, Annie. (1985). Schwa et syllabe en français. In Wetzels, Leo & Sezer, Engin (eds.) Studies in compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris. 187–226.Google Scholar
Rudes, Blair A. (1977). Another look at syllable structure. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1982). The syllable. In Van Der Hulst, , Harry, & Smith, Norval (eds.) The structure of phonological representations (vol. II). Dordrecht: Foris. 337–379.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, & Oerle, (eds.). 107–136.Google Scholar
Siebs, Theodor. (1961). Deutsche Hochsprache. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. (1881). Grundzüge der Phonetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.Google Scholar
Simon, Pila. (1968). Les consonnes françaises. Mouvements et positions articulatoires à la lumière de la radiocinématographie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. (1982). Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Treiman, Rebecca & Danis, Catalina. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory and Cognition 27. 87–104.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolaj S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Twaddell, William F. (1936). A phonological analysis of intervocalic consonant clusters in German. Actes 4 du Congrès International de Linguistique. 218–225.Google Scholar
Ulbrich, Horst. (1972). Instrumentalphonetisch-auditive R-Untersuchungen im Deutschen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. (1982). Silben, Segmente, Akzente. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. (1986). Preference laws for syllable structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. (1990). Syllable structure and simplex accent in Modern Standard German. Chicago Linguistics Society 26. 73–91.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. (1991). Syllable structure and syllable cut prosodies in Modern Standard German. In Bertinetto, Pier M., Kenstowicz, Michael & Loporcaro, Michele (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum II. Turina: Rosenberg & Sellier. 211–243.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo & Murray, Robert W. (1983). Sound change and syllable structure. Language 59. 514–528.Google Scholar
von, Essen Otto. (1962). Trubetzkoy's ‘fester’ und ‘loser’ AnschluB in experimentalphonetischer Sicht. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences. Helsinki: Mouton. 590–597.Google Scholar
Walsh, Thomas & Parker, Frank. (1983). Consonant cluster abbreviation. Journal of Phonetics 10.4. 423–439.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. (1986). Zur Theorie der Silbe. Studium Linguistik 20. 1–15.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. (1988). Silbische und lexikalische Phonologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WDA: Wörterbuch der deutschen Aussprache. (1969). München: Max Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (1980). Der deutsche Wortakzent: Fakten-Regeln-Prinzipien. Zeitschrift für Germanistik 3. 29–318.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. (1972). Note on a phonological hierarchy in English. In: Stockwell, Robert P. & McCauley, Ronald K. S. (eds.) Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 275–301.Google Scholar