Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Pied-piping in cognition 1


The paper offers an analysis of pied-piping within the theoretical framework of Word Grammar. This framework combines cognitive linguistics with dependency grammar, so it assumes that the full power of domain-general cognition is available for syntax, and that syntactic structure can be conceived as a network of relations between individual words. In this network, words are related by at least two kinds of link: dependencies and ‘landmark’ links that determine word order. To handle the special characteristics of pied-piping, the analysis also includes a single special relation, ‘pipee’, which links the ‘piper’ (the wh-type word) to the word which replaces it in the landmark structure. The analysis is applied in detail to English, and then compared with previous analyses and extended to accommodate both the pied-piping with inversion found in Meso-American languages, and the boundary markers found in other languages.

Corresponding author
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Hide All
[1] This paper has benefited from extensive discussion with And Rosta, Nik Gisborne and Stefan Müller, as well as from detailed and enormously helpful comments by two independent Journal of Linguistics referees. I am deeply grateful to all five.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Joan Bybee . 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seth Cable . 2012. Pied-piping: Introducing two recent approaches. Language and Linguistics Compass 6.12, 816832.

William Croft  & Alan Cruse . 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Östen Dahl . 1980. Some arguments for higher nodes in syntax: A reply to Hudson’s ‘Constituency and dependency’. Linguistics 18, 485488.

Nicholas Evans  & Stephen Levinson . 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32, 429492.

Nikolas Gisborne . 2010. The event structure of perception verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Julie Golomb , Jonathan Peelle , Kelly Addis , Michael Kahana  & Arthur Wingfield . 2008. Effects of adult aging on utilisation of temporal and semantic associations during free and serial recall. Memory & Cognition 36.5, 947956.

John Hawkins . 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fabian Heck . 2008. On pied-piping: Wh-movement and beyond. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Richard Hudson . 1984. Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

Richard Hudson . 2003. Trouble on the left periphery. Lingua 113, 607642.

Richard Hudson . 2013a. A cognitive analysis of John’s hat . In Kersti Börjars , David Denison  & Alan Scott (eds.), Morphosyntactic categories and the expression of possession, 149175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dana McDaniel , Cecile McKee  & Judy Bernstein . 1998. How children’s relatives solve a problem for Minimalism. Language 74, 308334.

Stefan Müller . 1999. An HPSG-analysis for free relative clauses in German. Grammars 2, 53105.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Linguistics
  • ISSN: 0022-2267
  • EISSN: 1469-7742
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 57 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 339 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd March 2017 - 22nd July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.