Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T18:54:15.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susan M. Gass & Larry Selinker, Second language acquisition: an introductory course. (Topics in Applied Psycholinguistics.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994. Pp. xvi + 357.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Donna Lardiere
Donna Lardiere*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
*
Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Shorter Notices
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , September 1994 , pp. 572 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S. & Schachter, J. (eds.) Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L. (1989). A look at a new classic. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 8 1129–153.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1977). The monitor model for adult second language performance. In Burt, M., Dulay, H. & Finocchiaro, M. (eds.) Viewpoints on English as a second language. New York:Regents. 152–161.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, G. (1991). Gradience in acceptability in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, G. (1993). Wh-movement in the acquisition of a second language: a crosslinguistic study of three languages with and without overt movement. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Martohardjono, G. & Gair, J. (1989). Apparent UG inaccessibility in second language acquisition: misapplied principles or principled misapplications? Ms., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Sato, Y. (1989). Cross-linguistic variation in subjacency: implications for second language acquisition. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 8.2. 63–117.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (1988). Second language acquisition and its relationship to Universal Grammar. Applied Linguistics 9. 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. (1989). Universal Grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., Travis, L. & Machlachlan, A. (1992). The acquisition of wh-question formation by Malagasy learners of English: evidence for Universal Grammar. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37. 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar