Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T18:37:27.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Model for mechanical properties nanoprobes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

N. A. Burnham ,
S. P. Baker  and
H. M. Pollock
N. A. Burnham
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts 01609, and Nanomechanics LLC, 301 Salisbury Street, Worcester, Massachusetts 01609
S. P. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
H. M. Pollock
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Chemistry, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Researchers may use several different instruments to determine chemical and mechanical properties of materials with nanometer-scale vertical, and occasionally, lateral, resolution. Three such instruments are the depth-sensing indenter, the atomic force microscope, and the surface forces apparatus. Until now, these methods were individually modeled, and an analysis of their mechanical response was never done in a general way. In this article, we show that these instruments can be treated as a class—a class that we call mechanical properties nanoprobes (MPNs)—that can be described by a single universal linear model. Using this model, we solved both the quasistatic and dynamic response as a function of excitation frequency and complex compliance using an electrical analog for the mechanical system. Earlier work did not find correct solutions for the amplitude and phase, did not examine the influence of finite stiffness in the head of the MPN, and overlooked the difference between a partial and full derivative and its influence on quasistatically acquired force curves. The equations here will allow scientists to correctly interpret their results concerning elastic and anelastic materials response, especially for low-modulus, high-damping samples such as polymers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 15 , Issue 9 , September 2000 , pp. 2006 - 2014
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D.. J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Pollock, H.M., Nanoindentation, , in Friction, Lubrication and Wear Technology (ASM Handbook, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1992), Vol. 18, pp. 419–429.Google Scholar
3.Binnig, G., Quate, C.F., and Gerber, Ch., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Burnham, N.A. and Colton, R.J., in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy: Theory, Techniques and Applications, edited by Bonnell, D.A. (VCH Publishers, New York, 1993), pp. 191–249.Google Scholar
5.Tabor, D. and Winterton, R.H.S, Proc. R. Soc. A 312, 435 (1969).Google Scholar
6.Israelachvili, J.N., Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic Press, New York, 1992).Google Scholar
7.Pethica, J.B. and Oliver, W.C., Phys. Scr. T 19, 61 (1987).Google Scholar
8.Sönderlund, E. and MacMillan, N.H., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 10, 720 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Burnham, N.A., Gremaud, G., Kulik, A.J., Gallo, P-J., and Oulevey, F.. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, 1308–12 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Luengo, G., Schmitt, F-J., Hill, R., and Israelachvili, J., Macromolecules 30, 2482 (1998).Google Scholar
11.Attard, P., Sculz, J.C., and Rutland, M.W., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 3852 (1998).Google Scholar
12.Turner, J.A., Hirsekorn, S., Rabe, U., and Arnold, W., J. Appl. Phys. 82, 966 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Johnson, K.L., Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Burnham, N.A. and Kulik, A.J., in Handbook of Micro / Nanotribology, edited by Bhushan, B. (CRC Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 1999).Google Scholar
15.Oulevey, F., Gremaud, G., Sémoroz, A., Kulik, A.J., Burnham, N.A., Dupas, E., and Gourdon, D., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69, 2085 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hixon, E.L., in Shock and Vibration Handbook, edited by Harris, C.M. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995), Chap. 10.Google Scholar
17.Lucas, B.N., Oliver, W.C., and Swindeman, J.E., in Fundamentals of Nanoindentation and Nanotribology, edited by Moody, N.R., Gerberich, W.W., Burnham, N., and Baker, S.P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 522, Warrendale, PA, 1998), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
18.Variac, P. and Cretin, B., Appl. Phys. A 66, S227 (1998),CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Loubet, J-L., Gourdon, D., and Burnham, N.A. (unpublished).Google Scholar
20.Strojny, A., Xinyun, X., Tsou, A., and Gerberich, W.W., J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 12, 1299 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Workshop on Dynamic Force Microscopy at Ultrasonic Frequencies, Surf. Interface Anal. 27, 558 (1999).3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar