Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T00:50:46.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Early Danian Gastropod Assemblage From Northern Patagonia, Río Negro Province, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Claudia Julia del Rio
Claudia Julia del Rio*
Affiliation:
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales B, Rivadavia A, Gallardo 470, 1405 Buenos Aires, Argentina,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new early Danian gastropod assemblage contained in the Roca Formation of Río Negro Province was analyzed. Eleven species are described and illustrated, the new genus Rocalaria is created, and six new species are recognized: Gyroscala daniana, Heteroterma carmeloi, Microfulgur concheyroae, Sulcobuccinum prominentum, Cidarina lenzaniyeuensis, and Rocalaria alani. The present research includes the first mention of Sulcobuccinum d'Orbigny, 1850, Priscoficus Conrad, 1866, Cavoscala Whitfield, 1892, Microfulgur Finlay and Marwick, 1937, and Cidarina Dall, 1909, for the Danian of Southern South America; the new record of Austrophaera Furque and Camacho, 1949, Fusinus Rafinesque, 1815 and Heteroterma Gabb, 1869 in northern Patagonia; and the oldest Paleogene record for the genus Gyroscala de Boury, 1887. The presence of the study assemblage in northern Patagonia indicates a more complex paleobiogeographic pattern for the area than previously thought, as shown by the record of endemic genera, cosmopolitan taxa, elements with Tethyan/ Indo-Pacific affinities, and genera related with “Wangaloan” faunas of the Paleocene of New Zealand.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 86 , Issue 6 , November 2012 , pp. 1002 - 1016
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandel, K. and Stinnesbeck, W. 2000. Gastropods of the Quiriquina Formation (Maastrichtian) in central Chile: Paleobiogeographic relationships and the description of a few new taxa. Zentrablatt für Geologie und Paläontologie, Teil 1:757–788.Google Scholar
Bandel, K. 2010. Relationships of the Triassic Eucycloidea Koken, 1897 (Mollusca, Gastropoda) to modern genera such as Pagodatrochus, Calliotropis and Euchelus, based on morphology of the early shell. Bulletin of Geosciences, 85:435–486.Google Scholar
Barrio, C. A. 1990. Late Cretaceous–early Tertiary sedimentation in a semi-arid foreland basin (Neuquen Basin, Western Argentina). Sedimentary Geology, 66:255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertels, A. 1969. Estratigrafía del Límite Cretácico–Terciario en Patagonia Septentrional. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 24:41–54.Google Scholar
Berry, S. S. 1910. Review of: Report on a collection of shells from Perú, with a summary of the littoral marine Mollusca of the Peruvian zoological province by W. H. Dall. The Nautilus, 23 (10):130–132.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G. and Maxwell, P. A. 1990. Cenozoic Mollusca from New Zealand. Paleontological Bulletin of the New Zealand Geological Survey, 58, 518p.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G. and Raine, J. I. 2009. Revised descriptions of New Zealand Cenozoic Mollusca from Beu and Maxwell (1990). GNS Science Miscellaneous, Series 27.Google Scholar
Briart, A. and Cornet, F. L. 1870. Description des fossils du Calcaire grossier de Mons. Partie 1: Gastéropodes. Mémoires de la Académie Royale des Sciences des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique, 36:1–76.Google Scholar
Brunet, R. F. J. 1995. New species of Mollusca from the Entrerriense Formation (upper Miocene) of Chubut Province, Argentina and species not previously reported from this formation. Pt. I. Gastropoda and Scaphopoda. Tulane Studies in Geology, 28:1–56.Google Scholar
Bucquoy, E., Dautzenberg, P., and Dollfus, G. 1882–1883. Les mollusques marins du Rousillon. 1. Gastropodes. Paris, 570p.Google Scholar
Camacho, H. H. 1992. Algunas consideraciones acerca de la transgresión marina paleocena en la Argentina. Miscelánea de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias, 85:1–41.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. P. 1864. Supplementary report on the present state of our knowledge with regard to the Mollusca of the west coast of North America. Report of the British Association of Advancement of Science, p. 517–686.Google Scholar
Clench, W. J. and Turner, R. D. 1950. The genera Sthenorytis, Cirsotrema, Acirsa, Opalia and Amaea in the western Atlantic. Johnsonia, 2:221–246.Google Scholar
Clench, W. J. and Turner, R. D. 1951. The genus Epitonium in the Western Atlantic. Part 1. Johnsonia, 2:249–288.Google Scholar
Clench, W. J. and Turner, R. D. 1952. The genus Epitonium (Part 2), Depressiscala, Cylindriscala, Nyestella and Solutiscala in the Western Atlantic. Johnsonia, 2:289–356.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1860. Descriptions of new species of Cretaceous and Eocene fossils of Mississippi and Alabama. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, second series, 4:275–298Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1866. Further observations on Mr. Gabb's Paleontology of California. American Journal of Conchology, 2:97–100.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. A. 1869. Notes on Recent and fossil shells, with descriptions of new genera. American Journal of Conchology, 4 (4):246–249.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1888. Note rectificative sur la nomenclature d'un genre de coquilles fossiles. Journal de Conchyliologie, 36:335.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1901. Essais de Paléoconchologie comparée, Vol. 4. M. Cossmann, Paris, 293p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. 1912. Essais de Paléoconchologie comparée, Vol. 9. Chez l'Auteur, J. Lamarre and Cie, Paris, 215p.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M. and G.Pissarro, . 1910–1913. Iconographie complète des coquilles fossiles de l'Éocène des environs de Paris. Scaphopodes, Gastropodes, Brachiopodes, Céphalopodes & Supplément. Tome 2e. Cossmann, M. and Pissarro, G., Paris.Google Scholar
Cox, L. R. 1960. Thoughts on the classification of the Gastropoda. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 33:239–261.Google Scholar
Cuchi, R., Busteros, A., and Lema, E. 2001. Los Menucos. Hoja Geológica 4169-II. Provincia de Río Negro. Escala 1:250.000. Boletín del Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, 265:1–67.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. 1797. Tableau elementaire de l'histoire naturelle des animaux. Bandouin, Paris, 710p.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1909. Contributions to the Tertiary Paleontology of the Pacific Coast, I. The Miocene of Astoria and Coos Bay, Oregon. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 59:1–278.Google Scholar
Darragh, T. A. 1997. Gastropoda, Scaphopoda, Cephalopoda and new Bivalvia of the Paleocene Pebble Point Formation, Victoria, Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 109:57–108.Google Scholar
Davies, H. M. 1934. Tertiary faunas. Vol. 2. The Sequence of Tertiary Faunas, Thomas Murby & Co., London, 252p.Google Scholar
dè Boury, E. 1887. Etude sur les sous genres de Scalidae du Bassin de Paris. Journal de Conchyliologie, 35:332–333.Google Scholar
dè Boury, E. 1890. Observations sur quelques Scalidae du Bassin de Paris et description d'une espèce nouvelle. Journal de Conchyliologie, 38:139–143.Google Scholar
dè Boury, E. 1911. Etude sur les sous-genres de Scalidae vivants et fossils. Partie 2: Monographie des Gyroscala. Partie 2. Monographie des Gyroscala. Journal de Conchyliologie, 58 (3):212–260.Google Scholar
dè Boury, E. 1917. Révision critique de l'étude des Scalaraires faite par M. Cossmann dans les “Essais de Paléoconchologie.” Journal de Conchyliologie, 63:13–12.Google Scholar
Defrance, J. L. M. 1827. Dictionnaire des Sciences naturelles, Tome 51. F. G. Levrault, Paris, 534p.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, A. 1880. Fauna di San Giovanni Ilarione (Parisiano). Parte 1(1). Palermo, 110p.Google Scholar
del Río, C. J., Stilwell, J. D., Concheyro, A., and Martínez, S. 2007. Paleontology of the Danian Cerros Bayos section (La Pampa Province, Argentina). Alcheringa, 31:241–269.Google Scholar
del Río, C., Concheyro, A., and Martínez, S. 2011. The Maastrichtian–Danian at General Roca: A reappraisal of the chronostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of a type locality (Patagonia, Argentina). Neues Jahrbusch für Geologie Paläontologie, 259:129–156.Google Scholar
Deshayes, G. P. 1835. Description des coquilles fossiles des environs de Paris, 2 (40–45), (4):433–460, Atlas 2. F. G. Levrault, Paris.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. 1850. Prodrome de paléntologie stratigrafique universelle des animaux mollusques & rayonnés, faisant suite au cours élémentaires de paléontologie et de géologie stratigraphiques. Deuxiéme Vol. Victor Masson, Paris, 428p.Google Scholar
Döring, A. 1882. Geología. Informe oficial de la Comisión científica agregada al Estado Mayor General de la expedición al Río Negro (Patagonia) realizada en los meses de abril, mayo y junio de 1879, bajo las órdenes del General Julio A. Roca. Buenos Aires, 1881. Entrega 3. Parte 3. Buenos Aires, p. 295–530.Google Scholar
Dushane, H. 1979. The Family Epitoniidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Northeastern Pacific. The Veliger, 22:91–134.Google Scholar
Echevarría, A. E. 1995. Registro de los ostrácodos marinos del Paleógeno de Argentina. Publicación Especial de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina, 3:51–62.Google Scholar
Farchad, H. 1936. Étude du Thanétien (Landénien marin) du Bassin de Paris. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, 30:1–103.Google Scholar
Feruglio, E. 1936. Palaeontographia Patagonica. Memoire Istituto Geologico Realle Universitá Padova, (11–12):1–384.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J. 1930. Revision of the New Zealand shells referred to Fusinus. Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute, 61:259–270.Google Scholar
Finlay, H. J. and Marwick, J. 1937. The Wangaloan and Associated Molluscan Faunas of Kaitangata Green Island Subdivision. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, 15:1–140.Google Scholar
Fischer, P. 1884. Manuel de conchyliologie et de paléontologie conchyliologique ou Histoire naturelle des mollusques vivants et fossiles. Fascicule 7:609–688. F. Savy, Paris.Google Scholar
Furque, G. and Camacho, H. H. 1949. El Cretácico superior de la costa atlántica de Tierra del Fuego. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 4:263–298.Google Scholar
Gabb, W. M. 1869. Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils. California Geological Survey, Palaeontology, 2:1–299.Google Scholar
Getino, P. R. 1995. Estratigrafía del sector suroccidental de la meseta de Colitoro, Provincia de Río Negro. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 50:243–256.Google Scholar
Glibert, M. 1973. Revision des Gastropoda du Danien et du Montien de la Belgique. Mémoires du Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, 173:3–116.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1847. A list of the genera of the Recent Mollusca, their synonyms and types. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 15:129–219.Google Scholar
Gray, J. E. 1853. On the divisions of the ctenobrancheous gasteropodous Mollusca into larger groups and families. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 21:32–44.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. and Hünicken, M. A. 1994. Late Cretaceous–Early Tertiary gastropods from southeastern Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Paleontology, 68:257–274.Google Scholar
Hickman, C. S. and McLean, J. H. 1990. Systematic revision and suprageneric classification of Trochacean Gastropods. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Sciences Series, 35:1–169.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von. 1903. Les Mollusques des Terrains Crétaciques Supérieurs de l'Argentine Orientale.—Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires 9, (serie 3), 2:193–229.Google Scholar
Ihering, H. von. 1907. Les Mollusques fossiles du Tertiaire et du Cretacé Supérieur de l'Argentine. Anales del Museo Nacional de Buenos Aires, serie 3, 14 (7):1–611.Google Scholar
Kilburn, R. N. 1985. The Family Epitoniidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in southern Africa and Mozambique. Annals of the Natal Museum, 27:239–337.Google Scholar
Koken, E. 1897. Die Gastropoden der Trias un Hallstadt Abhandlungen der K. K. Geologischen Reischsanstaldt, 17 (4):1–112.Google Scholar
Labudía, C. H. and Bjerg, E. A. 1994. Geología del sector oriental de la Hoja Hondo (39e), Provincia de Río Negro. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina, 49:284–296.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A.De, M. De. 1804. Suite des mémoires sur les fossiles des environs de Paris. Annales du Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, 3:436–441.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A.De, M. De. 1812 Extrait du Cours de Zoologie du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle sur les animaux san vertebrés. D'Hautel, Gabon, Paris, 127p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A.De, M. De. 1819. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans vertébrés, tome 6, Partie 2. Chez l'Auter,Paris, 232p.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. P. B. A.De, M. De. 1822. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans vertébrés, tome 7, Partie 2. Chez l'Auter, Paris, 710p.Google Scholar
Linné, C. von. 1758. Systema Naturae. Edition 10. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 823p.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. A. P. 1917. The Wangaloa beds. Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 49:450–460.Google Scholar
Marwick, J. 1942. Some Eocene Mollusca from New Zealand. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 72:268–279.Google Scholar
Meek, F. B. 1864. Check list of Invertebrate fossils of North America: Cretaceous and Jurassic. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 7 (177):1–40.Google Scholar
Melleville, m. 1843. mémoire sur les sables tertiaires inférieurs du Bassin de Paris, avec la description de 78 espèces de coquilles fossiles inèdites de ce terrain et 10 planches reprèsentant ces espèces. Fortin, Masson, Paris, 88p.Google Scholar
Morton, S. G. 1834. Synopsis of the organic remains of the Cretaceous group of the United States. Appendix. Catalogue of the fossil shells of the Tertiary formation of the United States. Timothy A. Conrad, Philadelphia, 88p.Google Scholar
Náñez, C. 1998. Informe micropaleontológico sobre muestras de la Hoja 4169-II, Los Menucos. Instituto de Geología y Recursos Minerales. Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, 2 p. (unpublished). Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. N. and Frassinetti, D. 2003. New and little known species of Pseudolividae (Gastropoda) from the Tertiary of Chile. The Nautilus, 117:91–96.Google Scholar
Oleinik, A. E. and Zinsmeister, W. 1996. Paleocene Diversification of Bucciniform Gastropods on Seymour Island, Antarctica. Journal of Paleontology, 70:923–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacaud, J. and Schnetler, K. I. 1999. Revision of the gastropod family Pseudolividae from the Paleocene of West Greenland and Denmark. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 46:53–67.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. S. 1946. Estudios Geológicos en la región del Río Chubut Medio. Boletín de la Dirección General de Minas y Geología, 59:1–137.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. 1844. Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer oder wenig gekannter Conchylien, 1:77–186.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. 1970: A new archibenthal species of Fasciolariidae from New Zealand. Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia, 2:1–5.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F. and Lindberg, D. R. 1997. Towards a phylogeny of gastropods molluscs—an analysis using morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119:83–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature, ou Tableau de l'Universe et des Corps organisees. Le Nature es mon guide, et Linnéus mon maıtre. Palermo, Italy, privately published, 224p.Google Scholar
Röding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum sive catalogus cimeliorum e tribus regnis naturae quae olim collegerat. Jao. Fried. Bolten M.D. Pars secunda continens conchylia sive testacea univalvia, bivalvia et multivalvia. Hamburg, J. C. Trapii, viii + 199 p. [facsimile reprint, Sherborn and Sykes, London, 1906].Google Scholar
Roth, S. 1899. Apuntes sobre la geología y la paleontología de los territorios del Río Negro y Neuquén. Reconocimiento de la región andina de la República Argentina. Revista del Museo de La Plata, 9:141–197.Google Scholar
Salvini-Plawen, L. von. 1980. A reconsideration of systematic in the Mollusca (Phylogeny and higher classification). Malacology, 19:249–278.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1988 a. Latest Cretaceous and early Tertiary Tudiclidae and Melongenidae (Gastropoda) from the Pacific Slope of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 62:880–889.Google Scholar
Saul, L. R. 1988 b. New Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary Perissitydae (Gastropoda) from the Pacific Slope of North America. Contributions in Science, 400:1–25.Google Scholar
Schiller, W. 1922. Los sedimentos marinos del límite entre el Cretáceo y Terciario de Roca en la Patagonia septentrional. Revista del Museo de La Plata, 26 (tercera serie), 2:256–280.Google Scholar
Seguenza, L. 1903. Molluschi poco noti dei terreni terziari di Messina. Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana, 21:455–464.Google Scholar
Snyder, M. A. 2003. Catalogue of the marine gastropod family Fasciolariidae. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Special Publication, 21:1–431.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1960. Archaeogastropoda, Mesogastropoda and Stratigraphy of the Ripley Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff formations. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 331A:1–151.Google Scholar
Sohl, N. F. 1964. Neogastropoda, Opisthobranchia, and Basommatophora from the Ripley, Owl Creek, and Prairie Bluff formations. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 331B:153–344.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. M. 1812. The mineral Conchology of Great Britain or coloured figures and descriptions of those remains of testaceous animals or shells which have been preserved at various times and depths in the earth. London, Vol. 1, B. Meredith, London, 245p.Google Scholar
Sowerby, J. de C. 1838. Mineral Conchologie Grossbritaniens, von James Sowerby, deutsche Bearbeitung, herausgegeben von Hercules Nicolet, durchgesehen von Dr. Agassiz, Pt. 1. J. de C. Sowerby, H. Nicolet, Neuchâtel, London, 52p.Google Scholar
Spalletti, L. A. 1988. Los ambientes sedimentarios del límite Cretácico–Terciario en el sector occidental del Macizo Nordpatagónico. Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Mineralogía, Petrología y Sedimentología, 19:49–56.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. 1989. A new pseudolivine gastropod genus from the Lower Tertiary of North America. Journal of Paleontology, 63:38–47.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L., Zinsmeister, W. J., and Paredes-Mejía, L. M. 1989. Popenoeum, a new pseudolivine gastropod genus, widespread and most diversified during the Paleocene. Journal of Paleontology, 63:212–217.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. and Goedert, J. L. 1995. New species of middle Eocene gastropods from northern Dotty Hills, southwestern Washington. The Veliger, 38:254–269.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. and Saul, L. R. 2003 a. New late Cretaceous (Campanian and Maastrichtian) marine gastropods from California. Journal of Paleontology, 77:50–63.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. and Saul, L. R. 2003 b. Additions to late cretaceous shallow-marine gastropods from California. The Veliger, 46:145–161.Google Scholar
Squires, R. L. and Saul, L. R. 2006. New buccinoid gastropods from uppermost Cretaceous and Paleocene strata of California and Baja California, Mexico. The Nautilus, 120:66–78.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1896. The faunal relations of the Eocene and Upper Cretaceous on the Pacific coast. United States Geological Survey. 17th Annual Report Part 1:1011–1060.Google Scholar
Stanton, T. W. 1901. The Marine Cretaceous Invertebrates, p. 1–43. InScott, W. B.(ed.), Reports of the Princeton University Expedition to Patagonia 1896–1899, Vol. 4, Paleontology 1, Pt. 1.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. B. 1927. Gabb's California fossil type gastropods. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 78:287–447.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. D. 1993. New early Paleocene Mollusca from Wangaloa Formation of South Island, New Zealand. Journal of Paleontology, 67:360–369.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. 2003. Patterns of biodiversity and faunal rebound following the K–T boundary extinction event in Austral Paleocene molluscan faunas. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 195:319–356.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. and Zinsmeister, W. 1992. Molluscan Systematics and Biostratigraphy. Lower Tertiary La Meseta Formation, Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Antarctic Research Series, 55:1–152.Google Scholar
Stilwell, J. D., Zinsmeister, W. J., and Oleinik, A. E. 2004. Early Paleocene Mollusks of Antarctica: systematics, paleoecology and paleobiogeographic significance. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 367:1–89.Google Scholar
Suter, H. 1917. Descriptions of New Tertiary mollusca occurring in New Zealand accompanied by a few notes on necessary changes in nomenclature. Part I. New Zealand Geological Survey, Palaeontological Bulletin, 5, 93p.Google Scholar
Swainson, W. 1840. A treatise on Malacology; on the Natural Classification of Shells and Shellfish. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans, London. 419p.Google Scholar
Tryon, G. W. 1880. Manual of conchology, structural and systematic, with illustrations of species. Vol. 3. Tritonidea, Fusidae, Buccinidae. Philadelphia310p.Google Scholar
Uliana, M. and Dellapé, D. 1981. Estratigrafía y Evolución paleoambiental de la sucesión Maestrichtiano-Eoterciaria del Engolfamiento Neuquino (Patagonia Septentrional). 8th Congreso Geológico Argentino, San Luis, Actas 3:673–711.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1998. Generic revision of the Neogastropod Family Pseudolividae. The Nautilus, 111:53–48.Google Scholar
Villate, J. 1970. Deux Olivide identiques: Pseudoliva prima (Defrance) et Pseudoliva poursanensis (Doncieux). Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 106 (1–2):22–27.Google Scholar
Wade, B. 1917. New and little known Gastropoda from the Upper Cretaceous of Tennessee. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 69:280–304.Google Scholar
Wade, B. 1926. The Fauna of the Ripley Formation on Coon Creek, Tennessee. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper, 137:1–272.Google Scholar
Wanner, J. 1902. Die fauna der obersten weissen Kreide des libyschen Wüst. Palaeontographica, 30 (2):91–152.Google Scholar
Waring, C. A. 1917. Stratigraphic and faunal relations of the Martínez to the Chico and Tejón of southern California. Academy of Science, Series 4, 7 (4):41–124.Google Scholar
White, C. A. 1887. Contribuções á paleontologia do Brazil. Archivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro, 7, 273p.Google Scholar
Whitfield, R. P. 1892. Gasteropoda and Cephalopoda of the Raritan Clays and Greensands Marls of New Jersey. Monographs of the United States Geological Survey, 18:1–295.Google Scholar
Wichmann, R. 1927. Resultados de un viaje de estudios geológicos en los territorios del Río Negro y del Chubut. Publicación de la Dirección general de Minas, Geología e Hidrogeología, 33:1–59.Google Scholar
Windhaussen, A. 1914. Contribución al conocimiento geológico de los territorios del Río Negro y Neuquén. Anales del Ministerio de Agricultura, Sección Geología, Mineralogía y Minería, 10 (1):9–60.Google Scholar
Wilckens, O. 1905. Die Lamellibranchiaten, Gastropoden, etc. der oberen Kriede Südpatagoniens. Berichten der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg i. B, Band 15, p. 91–156.Google Scholar
Wrigley, A. G. 1927. Note on English Eocene Mollusca, with descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 17 (5–6):216–249.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1982. Late Cretaceous–early Tertiary Molluscan biogeography of the southern circum-Pacific. Journal of Paleontology, 56:84–102.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. 1983. New Late Paleocene molluscs from the Simi Hills, Ventura County, California. Journal of Paleontology, 57:1282–1303.Google Scholar
Zinsmeister, W. J. and Griffin, M. 1995. Late Cretaceous and Tertiary Aporrhaid gastropods from the Southern rim of the Pacific Ocean. Journal of Paleontology, 69:692–702.Google Scholar