Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T13:08:17.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trilobites from the upper part of the Deadwood Formation (Upper Franconian and Trempealeauan stages, Upper Cambrian), Black Hills, South Dakota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

James H. Stitt
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65211
Wendy Metcalf Straatmann
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia 65211

Abstract

Trilobites assigned to 29 genera and 39 species are reported from the Deadwood Formation in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Two new species, Prosaukia lochmani and Arcifimbria pahasapaensis, are described. Brachiopods are reported from the Taenicephalus Zone.

A biostratigraphic zonation is established for the upper part of the Deadwood Formation. The Taenicephalus Zone in the lower part of the study interval is succeeded upsection by the Ellipsocephaloides Zone, both of which are assigned to the Franconian Stage. These two zones are overlain in turn by the Illaenurus and Saukia Zones of the Trempealeauan Stage. These zones are used to correlate this part of the Deadwood with coeval strata in Montana and Wyoming, central Texas, Oklahoma, and Alberta, Canada. The lowstand of sea level that occurred in the Great Basin at the time of the deposition of the Saukiella junia Subzone of the Saukia Zone probably extended eastward into the Black Hills, resulting in the absence of this fauna in the Black Hills.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, W. C., and Ellinwood, H. L. 1962. Upper Franconian and Lower Trempealeauan Cambrian trilobites and brachiopods, Wilberns Formation, central Texas. Journal of Paleontology, 36:385423.Google Scholar
Bell, W. C., Feniak, O. W., and Kurtz, V. E. 1952. Trilobites of the Franconia Formation, southeast Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 26:175198.Google Scholar
Berg, R. R. 1953. Franconian trilobites from Minnesota and Wisconsin. Journal of Paleontology, 27:553568.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1860. On some new species of fossils from the limestone near Point Levis opposite Quebec. Canadian Naturalist, 5:301324.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1865. Paleozoic fossils, Volume 1. Geological Survey of Canada, 426 p.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. H. 1925. Trilobites of the Beekmantown in the Philipsburg region of Quebec. Canadian Field Naturalist, 39:78.Google Scholar
Bridge, J. 1930 [1931]. Geology of the Eminence and Cardareva Quadrangles. Missouri Bureau of Geology and Mines, 2nd Series, 24, 228 p. (This publication is dated 1930, but according to Knight, 1941, Geological Society of America Special Paper 32:403, it was issued in 1931).Google Scholar
Cleland, H. F. 1900. The Calciferous of the Mohawk Valley. Bulletin of American Paleontology, 3:240266.Google Scholar
Cossman, M. 1902. Rectifications de nomenclature. Revue Critique de Paleozoologie, 6:52.Google Scholar
Frederickson, E. A. Jr. 1949. Trilobite fauna of the Upper Cambrian Honey Creek Formation. Journal of Paleontology, 23:341363.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1962. Trilobite distribution, upper Franconia Formation, (Upper Cambrian), southeastern Minnesota. Journal of Paleontology, 36:965998.Google Scholar
Grant, R. E. 1965. Faunas and stratigraphy of the Snowy Range Formation, southwestern Montana and northwestern Wyoming. Geological Society of America Memoir 96, 171 p.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1863. Preliminary notice of the fauna of the Potsdam Sandstone. 16th Annual Report of the Regents of the University of the State of New York on the condition of the State Cabinet of Natural History, Albany, p. 119222.Google Scholar
Harrington, H. J. 1959. General description of the Trilobita, p. O38O126. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Arthropoda 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1957. The trilobite family Olenidae. With description of Norwegian material and remarks on the Olenid and Tremadocian Series. Skrifter Utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-akademi i Oslo, 303 p.Google Scholar
Hu, C. H. 1969. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of three Upper Cambrian trilobites. Journal of Nanyang University, 3:438462.Google Scholar
Hu, C. H. 1981. Studies on the ontogeny and phylogenetic development of two Upper Cambrian trilobites from South Dakota. Transactions of the Proceedings of the Paleontological Society of Japan, 123:159167.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1909. Über die Agnostiden. Zeitschrift Deutsche Geolgische Gesellschaft, 16:380401.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935a. The Briscoia fauna of the late Upper Cambrian in Alaska with descriptions of a few Upper Cambrian trilobites from Montana and Nevada. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography, 12:3957.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T. 1935b. The Cambro-Ordovician formations and faunas of South Chosen; Paleontology; Part III, Cambrian faunas of South Chosen with a special study on the Cambrian trilobite genera and families. Tokyo Imperial University Journal of the Faculty of Science, Section 2, 4:49344.Google Scholar
Kulik, J. W. 1965. Stratigraphy of the Deadwood Formation, Black Hills, South Dakota and Wyoming. Unpublished M. S. thesis, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, 263 p.Google Scholar
Kurtz, V. E. 1975. Franconian (Upper Cambrian) trilobite faunas from the Elvins Group of southeast Missouri. Journal of Paleontology, 49:10091043.Google Scholar
Kurtz, V. E. 1976. Biostratigraphy of the Cambrian and lowest Ordovician Bighorn Mountains and associated uplifts in Wyoming and Montana. Bringham Young University Geology Studies, 23:215227.Google Scholar
Loch, J. D., Stitt, J. H., and Derby, J. R. 1993. Cambrian-Ordovician boundary interval extinctions: implications of revised trilobite and brachiopod data from Mount Wilson, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Paleontology, 67:497517.Google Scholar
Lochman, C. 1953. Notes on Cambrian trilobites—homonyms and synonyms. Journal of Paleontology, 22:886889.Google Scholar
Lochman, C. 1956. The evolution of some Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobite families. Journal of Paleontology, 30:445463.Google Scholar
Lochman, C. 1964. Upper Cambrian faunas from the subsurface Deadwood Formation, Williston Basin, Montana. Journal of Paleontology, 38:3360.Google Scholar
Lochman-Balk, C. 1956. The Cambrian of the Rocky Mountains and southwest deserts of the United States and adjoining Sonora Province, Mexico, p. 529661. In Rodgers, J. (ed.), Part 2: Australia, America, El sistema Cambrico, su paleogeografia y el problema de su base. 20th International Geological Congress, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Lochman-Balk, C. 1964. Paleo-ecologic studies of the Deadwood Formation (Cambro-Ordovician), p. 2538. In Sundaram, R. K. (ed.), Paleontology and Stratigraphy. Proceedings of Section 8 of the 22nd International Geological Congress, India.Google Scholar
Longacre, S. A. 1970. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Ptychaspid Biomere, Wilberns Formation, central Texas. Paleontological Society Memoir 4 (Journal of Paleotology, 44(1): Supplement), 70 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., and Westrop, S.R. 1983. Franconian trilobites of New York State. New York State Museum Memoir 23, 83 p.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., Westrop., S.R., and Kindle, C. H. 1989. Sunwaptan (Upper Cambrian)trilobites of the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland, Canada. Paleontographica Canadiana number 6, 175 p.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, H. A. and Lochman, C. 1934. Faunal zones in the Deadwood Formation of South Dakota. Proceedings of the Geological Society of America for 1934, 352353.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, H. A., and Lochman, C. 1935. Deadwood faunas in South Dakota and eastern Wyoming. Proceedings of the Geological Society of America for 1935, 386387.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1995. Acid insoluble residues, transgressive-regressive events, and conodont biostratigraphy in the Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician of western Utah and central Texas, p. 99104. In Cooper, J. D., Droeser, M. L. and Finney, S. C. (eds), Ordovician Odyssey: Short papers for the Seventh International Symposium on the Ordovician System, Pacific Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. North American geology and paleontology for the use of amateurs, students, and scientists. Western Methodist Book Concern, Cincinnati, Ohio, 718 p.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. A. 1951. Cambrian trilobites from the St. Croix Valley. Journal of Paleontology, 25:765784.Google Scholar
Raasch, G. O. 1951. Revision of Croixian dikelocephalids. Transactions Illinois Academy of Sciences, 44:137151.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1944. Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Levis Conglomerate. Journal of Paleontology, 18:229258.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1963. Additions to the Upper Cambrian fauna from the conglomerate boulders at Levis, Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 37:10091017.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1924. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Boston Society of Natural History Proceedings, 37:389466.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1937. Third contribution to nomenclature of Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 95, 29 p.Google Scholar
Resser, C. E. 1942. New Upper Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 103:1136.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1971. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Timbered Hills and lower Arbuckle Groups, western Arbuckle Mountains, Murray County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 110, 83 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1977. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Wichita Mountains area, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 124, 79 p.Google Scholar
Swinnerton, H. H. 1915. Suggestions for a revised classification of trilobites. Geological Magazine, New Series, 2:407496, 538-545.Google Scholar
Tullberg, S. A. 1880. Agnostus—artema i de Kambriska afflagringarne vid Andrarum. Sveriges Geologiska Undersokning [C], 42:137.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. and Resser, C. E. 1933. Saukiinae, Part II of Trilobita. In The Cambrian of the Upper Mississippi Valley. Milwaukee Public Museum Bulletin, 12, 122 p.Google Scholar
Voodes, A. W. 1890. A bibliography of Paleozoic Crustacea from 1698-1889, including a list of North American species and a systematic arrangement of genera. United States Geological Survey Bulletin, 63, 177 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1879. Descriptions of new species of fossils from the Calciferous Formation. 32nd Annual Report of the New York State Museum of Natural History, 129131.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1924. Cambrian and lower Ozarkian trilobites, Number 2. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections Publication 2788, 75:5360.Google Scholar
Westrop, S. R. 1986. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Sunwaptan Stage, southern Canadian Rocky Mountains, Alberta. Palaeontographica Canadiana number 3, 179 p.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F. W. 1936. The Cambrian faunas of Northeastern Australia. Queensland Museum Memoirs, 11:59112.Google Scholar