No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Upper Cambrian trilobite Stenopilus: Morphology, mode of life
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Abstract
Previously unstudied and earlier-known specimens have revealed the wide cephalic doublure and median ventral suture in Stenopilus; the hypostome is unknown but was probably natant. The cranidium of S. pronus differs from that of the type species S. intermedius in its greater length and convexity; the pygidium is known from rare complete specimens. These two species are present in Quebec, Newfoundland, and Vermont. They are differentiated from Leiocoryphe, which also had a highly effaced cephalon. Relationships remain problematic between these two genera and others currently placed in Plethopeltidae. An enrolled specimen of S. pronus is refigured and the anatomy and mode of life considered as that of a vagrant benthic animal rather than one that lived in a burrow as previously thought.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
Bridge, J. 1931. Geology of the Eminence and Cardareva Quadrangles. Missouri Bureau of Geology and Mines, 24, series 2, 228 p., 22 pls. (Date on cover of publication is 1930. Knight, J. B. 1941. Special paper 32, Geological Society of America, p. 403 states that the date of publication was March 1931)Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L., and Haas, W. 1997. Functional morphology of Phacopinae (Trilobita) and the mechanics of enrolment. Palaeontographica Abteilung A, 245:1–43, 14 pls.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L., and Haas, W. 2003. Making Phacops come alive. Special Papers in Palaeontology, Palaeontological Association, 70:331–347.Google Scholar
Clark, M. G., and Shaw, A. B. 1968. Paleontology of northwestern Vermont XVI. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian Gorge Formation (Upper bed 3). Journal of Paleontology, 42:1014–1026.Google Scholar
Clark, T. H. 1924. The paleontology of the Beekmantown Series at Levis, Quebec. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 10(41), 134 p.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A., and Adrain, J. M. 2003. Available generic names for trilobites. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 48(2):331–551.Google Scholar
Kaesler, R. L. (ed.). 1997. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita. Vol. 1 (revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, 530 p.Google Scholar
Logan, W. E. 1865. Geological Survey of Canada, Report of Progress, Atlas of Maps and Sections to Accompany the Geology of Canada. Montreal, iv + 42 p., maps and sections.Google Scholar
Longacre, S. A. 1970. Trilobites of the Upper Cambrian ptychaspid biomere, Wilberns Formation, central Texas. Paleontological Society Memoir, 4, vi + 70 p., 6 pls.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., and Westrop, S. R. 1983. Trilobite biofacies of the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary interval in northern North America. Alcheringa, 7:301–319.Google Scholar
Ludvigsen, R., Westrop, S. R., and Kindle, C. H. 1989. Sunwaptan (Upper Cambrian) trilobites of the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland, Canada. Palaeontographica Canadiana, 6, 175 p.Google Scholar
Maletz, J. 1997. Arenig biostratigraphy of the Pointe-de-Lévy slice, Quebec Appalachians, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 34:733–752.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1944. Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Lévis conglomerate. Journal of Paleontology, 18:229–258.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1945a. New Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Lévis conglomerate. Journal of Paleontology, 19:462–478.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1945b. Description supplémentaire de trois genres de trilobites Cambriens. Naturaliste Canadien, 72:117–124.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1952. Ventral cephalic sutures in Cambrian trilobites. American Journal of Science, 250:885–898.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1959. Trempealeauian trilobites from the Conococheague, Frederick and Grove limestones of the central Appalachians. Journal of Paleontology, 33:375–398.Google Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1963. Additions to the Upper Cambrian fauna from the conglomerate boulders at Levis, Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 37:1009–1017.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1913. A revision of the species which have been referred to the genus Bathyurus. Geological Survey of Canada, Victoria Memorial Museum Bulletin, 1:51–69.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1924. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 37:389–466, pls. 12–14.Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1925. New Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician trilobites from Vermont. Republished from 1924 with amendments in the Fourteenth Biennial Report of the Vermont State Geologist, 1923–1925, p. 137–208.Google Scholar
Riva, J. 1972. Geology of the environs of Quebec City. Guidebook, Excursion B-19, International Geological Congress, 24th Session, Canada, iv + 53 p.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1971. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Timbered Hills and Lower Arbuckle Groups, western Arbuckle Mountains, Murray County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 110, viii + 81 p., 8 pls.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1976. Functional morphology and life habits of the late Cambrian trilobite Stenopilus pronus Raymond. Journal of Paleontology, 50:561–576.Google Scholar
Stitt, J. H. 1977. Late Cambrian and earliest Ordovician trilobites, Wichita Mountains area, Oklahoma. Oklahoma Geological Survey Bulletin, 124, v + 79 p., 6 pls.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1997. Illaenidae (Trilobita): morphology of thorax, classification, mode of life. Journal of Paleontology, 71:878–896.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 2003. The Upper Cambrian trilobites Plethopeltis and Leiocoryphe: morphology, paedomorphism, classification. Journal of Paleontology, 77:698–705.Google Scholar