Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-rn2sj Total loading time: 0.446 Render date: 2022-08-09T22:37:52.841Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Policy overreaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Moshe Maor*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
*
Moshe Maor Wolfson Family Professor of Public Administration Department of Political Science The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mount Scopus Jerusalem 91905 Israel Tel.: +972 2588 3454 Fax: +972 2588 1333 Email: msmaor@mscc.huji.ac.il

Abstract

The literature on policy success and failure does not capture policies that may be too successful, as well as “too much” and/or “too soon” patterns of policy. To bridge this gap, this conceptual article relies on one of the most robust findings in the psychology of judgement, namely that many people are overconfident, prone to place too much faith in their intuitions. Based on this premise, the analytical framework advanced here revolves around two key dimensions of policy overreaction: (i) the effects of positive and negative events, and (ii) the effects of overestimation and accurate estimation of information. Based on these dimensions, the article identifies and illustrates four distinct modes of policy overreaction that reflect differences in the nature of implemented policy. It argues that the policy tools menu utilised in each mode of policy overreaction is dominated by unique mechanisms for changing or coordinating behaviour, which, once established, produce excessive – objective and/or perceived – social costs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. A.Shiller, R. J. (2009) Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alicke, M. D. (1985) Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 16211630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreas, P. (2003) Redrawing the line: borders and security in the twenty-first century. International Security 28(2): 78111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angner, E. (2006) Economists as experts: overconfidence in theory and practice. Journal of Economic Methodology 13(1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azizian, R. (1999) Russia's crisis: what went wrong? New Zealand International Review 24(1): 2.Google Scholar
Barak, E. (2009) Statement from Israel's defense minister. The New York Times 3 January.Google Scholar
Barber, B. M.Odean, T. (2001) Boys will be boys: overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1): 261292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R.Jones, B. D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bénabou, R. (2009) Groupthink: collective delusions in organizations and markets. NBER Working Paper No. 14764. Accessed on 2 September 2012 at www.nber.org/papers/w14764Google Scholar
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., Stern, E.Sundelius, B. (2005) The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P.McConnell, A. (2008) Conclusions: the politics of crisis exploitation. In Arjen B., McConnell A. and ’t Hart P. (eds.), Governing after Crisis: The Politics of Investigation, Accountability and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 285316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovens, M.’t Hart, P. (1996) Understanding Policy Fiascos. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bovens, M., ’t Hart, P.Peters, B. G. (2001) Analyzing governance success and failure in six European states. In Bovens M., ’t Hart P. and Peters B. G. (eds.), Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, W. B., Murphy, D.Menning, A. (2009) Learning to leverage new media: the Israeli Defense Forces in recent conflicts. Military Review 89(3): 210.Google Scholar
Cameron, A.Sebastien, B. (2010) Overconfidence and the Attainment of Status in Group. Working Paper Series. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. P. (2001) The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cesarini, D., Sandewall, Ö.Johannesson, M. (2006) Confidence interval estimation tasks and the economics of overconfidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61: 453470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colgrove, J. (2006) The ethics and politics of compulsory HPV vaccination. The New England Journal of Medicine 355: 23892391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comfort, L. K. (2002) Managing intergovernmental responses to terrorism and other extreme events. Publius 32(4): 2949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, E.Hunt, A. (2010) The HPV vaccination campaign: a project of moral regulation in an era of biopolitics. Canadian Journal of Sociology 35(1): 6382.Google Scholar
Cudahy, R. D. (2010) From Socialism to Capitalism: a winding road. Chicago Journal of International Law 11: 3952.Google Scholar
Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D.Subrahmanyam, A. (1998) A theory of overconfidence, self-attribution, and security market under- and overreaction. Journal of Finance 53(6): 18391886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. J. (2005) Evaluation Methodology Basics: The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bondt, W. F. M.Thaler, R. (1995) Financial decision making in markets and firms: a behavioral perspective. In Jarrow R. A., Maksimovic V. and Ziembaet W. T. (eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Sciences, Vol. 9. North-Holland. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 385410.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P. (1995) Policy disasters: explaining the UK's record. Public Policy and Administration 10(2): 5270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, P.Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990) Core executive studies in Britain. Public Administration 2: 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, S. C. (2009) Back to Basics: A Study of the Second Lebanon War and Operation Cast Lead. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Institute Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S.March, J. G. (1981) Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(2): 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, C., Boholm, Å.Löfstedt, R. (2001) From vision to catastrophe: a risk event in search of images. In Flynn J., Slovic P. and Kunreuther H. (eds.), Risk, Media and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology. London: Earthscan, 283300.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, M. (2001) The Tyranny of Health: Doctors and the Regulation of Lifestyle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frenkel, S. (2009) Israel backs down over white phosphorus. The Sunday Times 23 April.Google Scholar
Friedman, B. H. (2011) Managing fear: the politics of homeland security. Political Science Quarterly 126(1): 77106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, D.Brenner, L. (2004) Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. In Koehler D. J. and Harvey N. (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment & Decision Making, 2nd edition. Maldem, MA: Blackwell Publishing: 177199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, P. A.Warm, J. S. (1989) A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors 31: 519537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Handmer, J.Dovers, S. (2007) Handbook of Disaster and Emergency Policies and Institutions. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Harel, A.Sinai, R. (2009) IDF admits to overestimating Gaza rocket severity, but warns worst may be yet to come. Haaretz, 2 January.Google Scholar
Healy, A. J., Offenberg, J. (2007) Overconfidence, Social Groups, and Gender: Evidence from the Lab and Field. Accessed on 2 September 2012 at http://myweb.lmu.edu/jpate/overconfidence.pdfGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, R. K., Tetlock, P.Visser, P. S. (1999) Mass public decisions to go to war: a cognitive-interactionist framework. American Political Science Review 93(3): 553573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, S., Hunt, K., Langan, M., Bedford, H.Petticrew, M. (2010) Newsprint media representations of the introduction of the HPV Vaccination programme for cervical cancer prevention in the UK (2005–2008). Social Science & Medicine 70: 942950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogwood, B. W.Peters, B. G. (1985) The Pathology of Public Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2011) The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C.Lahav, G. (2005) Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 593608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, H. M.Mann, D. E. (eds.) (1980) Why Policies Succeed or Fail. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Janis, I. (1972) Victims of Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D. (1999) Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 297321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. D. (2012) Human nature of public policy: behavioral foundations for policy analysis. Keynote speech. The Federmann School of Public Policy and Government, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, May.Google Scholar
Jones, B. D.Baumgartner, F. R. (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D.Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39: 341350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, F. E., Pidgeon, N.Slovic, P. (2010) The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In Slovic P. (ed.), The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception. London: Earthscan, 317344.Google Scholar
Kassop, N. (2003) The war power and its limits. Presidential Studies Quarterly 33(3): 509529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, D. H. (1976) The logic of “policy” and successful policies. Policy Sciences 7(3): 351363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Murray, C. J. L., Salomon, J. A.Tandon, A. (2004) Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review 98: 191207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Kleindorfer, P. R. (2010) What if you know you will have to explain your choices to others afterwards? Legitimation in decision making. In Michel-Kerjan E. and Slovic P. (eds.), The Irrational Economist: Making Decisions in a Dangerous World. NY: Perseus Books, 7278.Google Scholar
Krantz, D. H. (2010) Constructed preference and the quest for rationality. In Michel-Kerjan E. and Slovic P. (eds.), The Irrational Economist: Making Decisions in a Dangerous World. NY: Perseus Books, 6571.Google Scholar
Kumar, B. M.Whynes, D. K. (2011) Explaining variation in the uptake of HPV vaccination in England. BMC Public Health 11: 172178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, J. S., Gonzales, R. M., Small, D. A.Fischhoff, B. (2003) Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: a national field experiment. Psychological Science 14(2): 144150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, J. S.Keltner, D. (2000) Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion 14(4): 473493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, M. (2004) An analytic narrative approach to puzzles and problems. In Shapiro I., Smith R. M. and Massoud T. E. (eds.) Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B.Lawrence, P. D. (1982) Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980. In Kahneman D., Slovic P. and Tversky A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 306334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maor, M. (2007) A scientific standard and an agency's legal independence: which of these reputation-protection mechanisms is less susceptible to political moves. Public Administration 85: 961978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maor, M. (2010) Organizational reputation and jurisdictional claims: the case of the U.S. food and drug administration. Governance 23(1): 133159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maor, M. (2011) Organizational reputation and the observability of public warnings in 10 pharmaceutical markets. Governance 24(3): 557582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maor, M. (2012) Risk and policy underreaction. Working Paper, Jerusalem: Department of Political Science, Hebrew University.Google Scholar
Maor, M., Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. (2012) The effect of salient reputational threats on the pace of FDA enforcement. Governance. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01601.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maor, M., Gilad, S.Bin-Nun Bloom, P. (forthcoming) Organizational reputation, regulatory talk and strategic silence, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.Google Scholar
Marangos, J. (2003) Was shock therapy really a shock? Journal of Economic Issues 37(4): 943966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medvedev, R. (2000) Post-Soviet Russia through the Yeltsin Era. N.Y.: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, A. (2010) Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. A.Healy, P. J. (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review 115(20): 502517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) (2011) HPV Vaccine: Updated March 2011. Accessed on 3 April 2011 at www.ncsl.org/default.aspx?tabid=14381Google Scholar
Nelson, L. D.Kuzes, I. Y. (1995) Radical Reform in Yeltsin's Russia: Political, Economic, and Social Dimensions. N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Palmer, L. I. (2009) What is urban health policy and what's law got to do with it? Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, XV(3): 635–663.Google Scholar
Patt, A.Zeckhauser, R. (2000) Action bias and environmental decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 21(1): 4572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, E. (2009) Crying out for justice. New Statesman 138, 4956, 28–29. Accessed on 2 September 2012 at www.newstatesman.com/middle-east/2009/07/israel-war-palestinian-rightsGoogle Scholar
Plous, S. (1993) The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T.Webb, P. (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prendergast, C. (1993) A theory of “yes men”. American Economic Review 83(4): 757770.Google Scholar
Rotemberg, J.Saloner, G. (2000) Visionaries, managers, and strategic direction. Rand Journal of Economics 31(4): 693716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P. A.Weible, C. M. (2007) The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In Sabatier P. A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Second edition. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 189222.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (2010) Unusually quiet: is Israel deterring terrorism? Strategic Assessment 13(2): 1927.Google Scholar
Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H.Keller, C. (2007) Trust and confidence in crisis communication: three case studies. In Siegrist M., Earle T. C. and Gutscher H. (eds.), Trust in Cooperative Risk Management: Uncertainty and Scepticism in the Public Mind. London: Earthscan, 267286.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality, 3 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. (1993) Perceived risk, trust and democracy. Risk Analysis 13(6): 675682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. (2000) The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Slovic, P. (ed.) (2010) The Feeling of Risk: New Perspectives on Risk Perception. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B.Lichtenstein, S. (1980) Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In Schwing R. and Albers W. (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? New York: Plenum, 181216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D. (2011) Quantifying uncertainty. In Skinns L., Michael S. and Cox T. (eds.), Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, J. (2002/2003) Dreaded risks and the control of biological weapons. International Security 27(3): 89123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. (2002) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stretch, R., Chambers, G., Wittaker, J., Critchley, T., Jackson, F., Montgomery, M. B., Roberts, S. A.Brabin, L. (2008) Implementing a school-based HPV vaccination programme. Nursing Times 104(48): 3033.Google ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, C. R. (2002) Probability neglect: emotions, worst cases and law. Yale Law Journal 112: 61107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Zeckhauser, R. J. (2008) Overreaction to fearsome risks. Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 08–17. Accessed on 2 September 2012 at SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1319881Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.Zeckhauser, R. J. (2010) Dreadful possibilities, neglected probabilities. In Michel-Kerjan E. and Slovic P. (eds.), The Irrational Economist: Making Decisions in a Dangerous World. NY: Perseus Books, 116123.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. (1991) Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 110(1): 6785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, S. (2003) Rights, liberties, and security: recalibrating the balance after September 11. Brookings Review 21(1): 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompson, W. (2002) Shock therapy: was Gaider really necessary? Problems of Post-Communism 49(4): 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A.Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185: 11241130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vamos, C.McDermott, R. (2008) The HPV vaccine: framing the arguments for and against mandatory vaccination of all middle school girls. Journal of School Health 78(6): 302309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, S. G.Malici, A. (2011) U.S. presidents and foreign policy mistakes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Waller, J., McCaffery, K.Wardle, J. (2004) Beliefs about the risk factors for cervical cancer in a British population sample. Preventive Medicine 38: 745753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weible, C. M.Sabatier, P. A. (2009) Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 121140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2001) Making Sense of the Organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell Business.Google Scholar
Wlezien, C. (1995) The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 9811000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, F. (2010) Don't panic: how our frenzied response to terrorism only feeds it. Newsweek. 9 January.Google Scholar
60
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Policy overreaction
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Policy overreaction
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Policy overreaction
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *