Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The politics of fiscal consolidation revisited

  • Evelyne Hübscher (a1)

This paper examines the capacity of governments to implement fiscal reforms in times of austerity. Unlike existing studies, which mostly focus on gradual policy changes like government spending, this analysis distinguishes between consolidation events and consolidation size to examine fiscal reforms. This strategy clarifies contradictory results in previous research and yields new insights into the underlying mechanism of fiscal reform. Based on an action-based data set that includes information about discretionary changes in taxation and government spending policies from 1978 until 2009 for 16 advanced (OECD) countries, the study shows that left and right governments are equally likely to implement cuts. Strategic considerations play a major role for the timing of fiscal consolidation, as the probability of fiscal cuts is highest at the beginning of the legislative term. When governments reform, the left cut as much as necessary, whereas right governments take the opportunity to reduce spending more.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Allan P. L. Scruggs (2004) Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies. American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496512.

L. M. Bartels (2005) Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind. Perspectives on Politics 3(1): 1531.

E. Huber and J. D. Stephens (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State – Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

J. O. Mierau , R. Jong-A-Pin and J. de Haan (2007) Do Political Variables Affect Fiscal Policy Adjustment Decisions? New Empirical Evidence. Public Choice 133: 297319.

P. Pierson (1998) Irresistible Forces, Immovable Objects: Post-Industrial Welfare States Confront Permanent Austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 5(4): 539560.

B. Vis (2009a) Governments and Unpopular Social Policy Reform: Biting the Bullet or Steering Clear? European Journal of Political Research 48(1): 3157.

B. Vis (2009b) The Importance of Socio-Economic and Political Losses and Gains in Welfare State Reforms. Journal of European Social Policy 19(5): 395407.

B. Vis and K. van Kersbergen (2007) Why and How Do Political Actors Pursue Risky Reforms. Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(2): 153172.

G. Wenzelburger (2011) Political Strategies and Fiscal Retrenchment: Evidence from Four Countries. West European Politics 34(6): 11511184.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Hübscher supplementary material

 PDF (283 KB)
283 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 193 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 471 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.