Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:08:20.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horace, Pindar and the Censorini in Odes 4.8*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

David Kovacs
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, pdk7g@virginia.edu

Extract

Odes 4.8 is anomalous: its thirty-four lines are not a multiple of four. Most editors delete two or six lines, but this involves deleting at least one blameless line and disturbing the stanzaic structure of the poem. Instead mark a lacuna of two or six lines before the final couplet. The missing lines will have contained a prayer for Censorinus' immortality and some words of praise, thereby fulfilling the expectations raised earlier in the poem. Vota in 34 refers to Horace's prayer, which Bacchus fulfils as god of poetry. Finally, the conceit that uates potentes can in real terms immortalize or deify their subjects chimes in with a feature of Roman religion noted by A. D. Nock.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © David Kovacs 2009. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* I would like to thank James Diggle, Richard Thomas, Tony Woodman, and JRS's two anonymous readers for comments and bibliographical help.