Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j5sqr Total loading time: 0.379 Render date: 2022-09-25T06:33:58.244Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Roman Studies and Digital Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2018

Roger S. Bagnall*
Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University
Sebastian Heath*
Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University


There is hardly any aspect of scholarly work and teaching in Roman Studies today not marked by digital technology. We assume that readers regularly access digital images of Roman material culture, use digitised corpora of primary sources in the original language or translation or consult online books and articles. The availability of digital resources on the internet is also a welcome enabler of ongoing public interest and even participation in the field. This overall state of affairs is generally a positive development, but both general trends and specific digital resources deserve a critical appraisal.

Review Articles
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bagnall, R. 2016: ‘Materializing ancient documents’, Daedalus 145(2), 7987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, D., Bonde, S., and Kestemont, M. 2017: ‘The digital Middle Ages: an introduction’, Speculum 92(S1), 138. Scholar
Bizer, C., Heath, T., and Berners-Lee, T. 2009: ‘Linked data – the story so far’, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 122.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C., Roughan, C., and Smith, N. 2017: ‘Citation and alignment: scholarship outside and inside the Codex’, Manuscript Studies 1.1. Scholar
Bodard, G., Cayless, H., Depauw, M., Isaksen, L., Lawrence, K., and Rahtz, S. 2017: ‘Standards for networking ancient person data: digital approaches to problems in prosopographical space’, Digital Classics Online 3(2). Scholar
Bond, S. 2017: ‘Dear scholars, delete your account at Academia.Edu’, Scholar
Bond, S., Long, H., and Underwood, T. 2017: ‘“Digital” is not the opposite of “Humanities”’, Chronicle of Higher Education Nov. 1, 2017. Scholar
Bransbourg, G. 2012: ‘Rome and the economic integration of Empire’, ISAW Papers 3. Scholar
Campana, S. 2017: ‘Opitz, Rachel, Mogetta, Marcello & Terrenato, Nicola (ed.). A mid-Republican house from Gabii. Ann Arbor.’, Antiquity 91(359), 1396–7.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (ed.) 2015: Images for Classicists, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Concanon, C. 2017: Assembling Early Christianity: Trade, Networks, and the Letters of Dionysios of Corinth, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, G. 2010: ‘Give us editors! Re-inventing the edition and re-thinking the Humanities’, in McGann, J. (ed.), Online Humanities Scholarship: The Shape of Things to Come, Houston, 8197.Google Scholar
Dunn, S. 2012: ‘Review of ORBIS’, Journal of Digital Humanities 1(3). Scholar
Elliott, T. 2014: ‘Epigraphy and digital resources’, in Bruun, C. and Edmondson, J. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy, Oxford, 7885.Google Scholar
Elliott, T., and Gillies, S. 2009: ‘Digital geography and classics’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 3.1 Scholar
Elliott, T., Heath, S., and Muccigrosso, J. 2014: ‘Current practice in linked open data for the ancient world’, ISAW Papers 7. Scholar
Gibbs, F. 2011: ‘Critical discourse in the Humanities’, Journal of Digital Humanities 12, online. Scholar
Graham, S., Milligan, I., and Weingart, S. 2015: Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian's Macroscope, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. 2010: ‘Diversity and reuse of digital resources for ancient Mediterranean material culture’, in Mahony, S. and Bodard, G. (eds), Digital Research in the Study of Classical Antiquity, Farnham, 3552.Google Scholar
Kansa, E. 2012: ‘Openness and archaeology's information ecosystem’, World Archaeology 44(4), 498520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, M. 2015: ‘UK treasures endangered by museum cuts’, The Guardian Feb. 2, 2015. Scholar
Kilgrove, K., and Montgomery, J. 2016: ‘All roads lead to Rome: exploring human migration to the eternal city through biochemistry of skeletons from two imperial-era cemeteries (1st–3rd c AD)’, PLOS One. Scholar
Lang, S. 2018: ‘Review of Perseus Digital Library’, RIDE: Review Journal for Digital Editions and Resources 8. Scholar
Mansfield, E. C. 2014: ‘Google Art Project and digital scholarship in the visual arts—’, Visual Resources 30, 110–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, B. 2016: ‘Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: basic principles and a case study of their implementation’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24(1), 424–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattern, S. 2013: The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meadows, A., and Gruber, E. 2014: ‘Coinage and numismatic methods. A case study of linking a discipline’, ISAW Papers 7.15. Scholar
Meeks, E. 2015: ‘The design and implementation of ORBIS: The Stanford geospatial network model of the Roman world’, Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology 41.2, 1721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, D. 2013: ‘Disciplinary impact and technological obsolescence in digital medieval studies’, in Siemens, R. and Shreibman, S. (eds), A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, Oxford, 6581.Google Scholar
Olson, B., Placchetti, R., Quartermaine, J., and Killebrew, A. 2013: ‘The Tel Akko Total Archaeology Project (Akko, Israel): assessing the suitability of multi-scale 3D field recording in archaeology’, Journal of Field Archaeology 38, 244–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opitz, R., Mogetta, M., and Terranato, M. (eds) 2016: A Mid-Republican House from Gabii, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Riordan, E. 2017: ‘A review of “Mid Republican House from Gabii” [digital publication]’, Internet Archaeology 45. Scholar
Orlandi, S. 2016: ‘Ancient inscriptions between citizens and scholars’, in Bodard, G. and Romanello, M. (eds), Digital Classics Outside the Echo Chamber, London, 205–21.Google Scholar
Poehler, E. 2018: ‘Review of Opitz, R. , Mogetta, M. and Terrenato, N. (eds), A Mid-Republican House from Gabii. University of Michigan, 2016. Online resource. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.9231782. isbn 9780472999002. US$150.00’, Journal of Roman Studies 108. doi:10.1017/S0075435818000205.Google Scholar
Posner, M. 2016: ‘Here and there: creating DH community’, in Gold, M. and Klein, L. (eds), Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, London, 265–73.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, A., Shaw, R., Buchanan, S., Golden, P., and Kansa, E. 2016: ‘Making sense of the ways we make sense of the past: The PeriodO Project’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 59 (2), 4255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhard, A. 2018: Archaeogaming: An Introduction to Archaeology in and of Video Games, New York.Google Scholar
Romanello, M. 2016: ‘Exploring citation networks to study intertextuality in Classics’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 10(2). Scholar
Roosevelt, C., Cobb, P., Moss, E., Olson, B., and Ünlüsoy, S. 2015: ‘Excavation is destruction digitization: advances in archaeological practice’, Journal of Field Archaeology 40(3), 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 2014: The Economics of the Roman Stone Trade, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sapirstein, P. 2017: ‘Review: A Mid-Republican House at Gabii’, SCS Blog. Scholar
Sapirstein, P., and Murray, S. 2017: ‘Establishing best practices for photogrammetric recording during archaeological fieldwork’, Journal of Field Archaeology 42(4), 337–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2013: ‘Explaining the maritime freight charges in Diocletian's Prices Edict’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 26, 464–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2014: ‘The shape of the Roman world: modelling imperial connectivity’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 27, 732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, B. 2015: ‘Comparing digital archaeological repositories: tDAR versus OpenContext’, Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian 4, 173213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, R., Isaksen, L., Barker, E., and de Soto, P. 2016: ‘Peripleo: a tool for exploring heterogeneous data through the dimensions of space and time’, Code4Lib Journal 31. Scholar
Stewart, P. 2008: The Social History of Roman Art, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. 2016: ‘The promise of the digital humanities and the contested nature of digital scholarship’, in Schreibman, S., Siemens, R. and Unsworth, J. (eds), A New Companion to Digital Humanities, Chichester, 524–37.Google Scholar
Tyers, P. 1996: ‘Roman amphoras in Britain’, Internet Archaeology 1. Scholar
Wigg-Wolf, D., and Duyrat, F. 2017: ‘La révolution des Linked Open Data en numismatique: les exemples de et Online Greek Coinage’, Archéologies numériques 1.1 Scholar
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Roman Studies and Digital Resources
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Roman Studies and Digital Resources
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Roman Studies and Digital Resources
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *