Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Eitrem, S.
1945.
La sibylle de cumes et virgile.
Symbolae Osloenses,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
88.
Article contents
Virgil and Roman Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 September 2012
Extract
“Virgile,” Sainte-Beuve wrote between fifty and sixty years ago in words which have become classical, “depuis l'heure où il parut a été le poète de la Latinité toute entière.” The saying has long been noted as marking what may be called the reinstatement of Virgil as a poet, after a period in which he had suffered some partial eclipse under the ignorant and impatient attacks of the romantic school. But to us now it may bear a further and a larger significance. The position of Virgil as a poet stands at the present day in need of no defence, but it is only during the last generation that his importance has come to be realised as an interpreter and recorder of Roman history and of the Latin civilisation. Classical study has during that generation been revolutionised. Our knowledge and understanding of the ancient world have become not only immensely greater in amount, but different in kind; year by year, almost day by day, we are getting more into touch with that world as something alive and solid. The studies of this Society, defined by us as those dealing with the history, art, and archaeology of Rome, Italy, and the Roman Empire, bear directly on our appreciation of the most learned and most comprehensive of Roman or Italian poets; and conversely Virgil's poetry yields up to the new methods and new enthusiasm of historians, artists, and archaeologists material which is so far from being exhausted that we seem still only beginning to sort it out, co-ordinate it, and use it.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © J. W. Mackail1913. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies
References
page 2 note 1 Georg. iv, 511; and see Classical Review for February, 1890.
page 3 note 1 Aen. i, 85; and compare Aen. ii, 406–409.
page 3 note 2 Aen. ii, 460, foll.
page 3 note 3 Aen. xi, 786.
page 3 note 4 Aen. vii, 730.
page 3 note 5 Aen. vii, 741.
page 4 note 1 Georg. i, 437.
page 4 note 2 ibid, i, 138.
page 4 note 3 ibid, i, 38.
page 5 note 1 Georg. i, 499.
page 5 note 2 Aen. vii, 242.
page 5 note 3 vii, 647.
page 5 note 4 x, 198–206.
page 6 note 1 Aen. viii, 480.
page 6 note 2 Aen. vii, 209.
page 6 note 3 9th April, 1913.
page 7 note 1 Aen. ix, 680.
page 7 note 2 Georg. ii, 451.
page 7 note 3 Aen. x, 708.
page 7 note 4 Georg. iv, 278.
page 7 note 5 ibid, iii, 373.
page 7 note 6 Aen. xi, 457.
page 7 note 7 Georg. iii, 474.
page 7 note 8 ibid, iii, 522.
page 7 note 9 ibid, ii, 374; iii, 532.
page 7 note 10 ibid, ii, 107–108.
page 7 note 11 ibid. iii, 196.
page 7 note 12 ibid. iv. 564.
page 8 note 1 Aen. vii, 629–631.
page 8 note 2 vii, 682–685.
page 8 note 3 vii, 710–717.
page 8 note 4 x, 183–184.
page 8 note 5 vii, 759.
page 8 note 6 vii, 750.
page 8 note 7 Georg. ii, 225; Aen. x, 565, 184.
page 8 note 8 Aen. vii, 800.
page 9 note 1 Aen. xii, 701–703.
page 9 note 2 vii, 563.
page 9 note 3 Georg. iv, 125; cf. Plutarch, Pomp. c. 24.
page 9 note 4 Georg. iii, 425.
page 9 note 5 Aen. iii, 78, foll.
page 9 note 6 Aen. iii, 192–200.
page 9 note 7 Aen. v, 193.
page 10 note 1 Georg. i, 56.
page 11 note 1 Georg. ii, 413, 468.
page 11 note 2 R.R. I, ii, 6.
page 11 note 3 R.R. II, i, 5.
page 11 note 4 Georg. iii, 339–345.
page 11 note 5 Georg. ii, 207–211.
page 12 note 1 Aen. x, 405–409.
page 12 note 2 Aen. xii, 521–522.
page 12 note 3 Georg. ii, 38.
page 13 note 1 Georg. ii, 502.
page 13 note 2 Aen. ix, 448–449.
page 14 note 1 Aen. i, 456–493.
page 14 note 2 i, 294.
page 14 note 3 viii, 626–728.
page 14 note 4 Horace, Od. iii, v, 2Google Scholar.
page 14 note 5 Aen. viii, 720.
page 14 note 6 Condebat of Dido, Aen. i, 447Google Scholar.
page 14 note 7 Aen. i, 505–506.
page 15 note 1 Servius on Aen. viii, 721.
page 15 note 2 Georg. iii, 12–39.
page 16 note 1 Georg. ii, 497.
page 16 note 2 Aen. x, 206.
page 18 note 1 Aen. vi, 43.
page 18 note 2 Aen. vi, 74: cf. Aen. iii, 443–452 for a fuller description.
page 19 note 1 1.140.
page 20 note 1 Aen. vi, 564, 565.
page 20 note 2 Aen. vii, 177–191.
page 21 note 1 Aen. vi, 887–888.
page 21 note 2 Aen. vi, 255–257.
page 22 note 1 vii, 170.
page 22 note 2 N.H. xxxvi, 19.
page 24 note 1 iii, 2.
- 1
- Cited by