Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-54vk6 Total loading time: 0.476 Render date: 2022-08-13T06:27:58.740Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Earned Citizenship: Labour Migrants’ Views on the Welfare State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2016

MONIQUE KREMER*
Affiliation:
Scientific Council for Government Policy, PO Box 20004, 2500 EA The Hague, Netherlands email: kremer@wrr.nl

Abstract

In policy and research, migration and the welfare state are often seen as being at odds. When ‘strangers’ enter the welfare state, the financial and social foundations of solidarity are said to crumble. A prominent question, therefore, is whether immigrants should have the same rights as the autochthonous population. Within this frame, migrants are often ‘objects’. This paper reports on qualitative research exploring what different types of labour migrants themselves think about the Dutch welfare state in general, and about giving social rights to immigrants, in particular. The differences in national backgrounds and levels of education in labour migrants’ views are striking: lower-educated Turkish and Polish migrants show little interest in the welfare state, whereas higher-educated Western Europeans seek welfare state security. Higher-educated Indian migrants find the welfare state a totally new concept, although after a while some come to appreciate it. A significant proportion of the questioned migrants, moreover, believe that people should not be entitled to welfare state rights immediately upon arrival. They favour ‘earned citizenship’, with the welfare state being a ‘contribution state’, but stress that migrants should not have to wait too long before being entitled to such rights. The paper also suggests new topics for further research in the increasingly important field of migration, diversity and the welfare state.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. and Glaeser, E.L. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the EU and Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avato, J., Koettl, J. and Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2010), Social security regimes, global estimates, and good practices: the status of social protection for international migrants. World Development, 38, 4, 455466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, P. (1990), The politics of social solidarity: Class bases of the European welfare state, 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (2006), Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, A. and Maître, B. (2011), Immigrant Welfare Receipt across Europe. Discussion Paper No. 5515. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
Bergh, A. and Fink, G. (2009), Immigrants’ Attitudes towards Redistribution: Implications for the Welfare State. Stockholm: The Ratio Institute.Google Scholar
Bolderson, H. (2010), The Ethics of Welfare Provision for Migrants: A Case for Equal Treatment and the Repositioning of Welfare. Journal of Social Policy, Volume 40, issue 2, 219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bommes, M. and Geddes, A. (2000), Immigration and Welfare: Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borjas, G. J. (1999), Immigration and welfare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics, 17, 607637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brochmann, G. and Hagelund, A. (2012), Immigration Policy and the Scandinavian Welfare State 1945–2010. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, B., Koster, F. and van Egmond, M. (2012), Support for Redistribution and the Paradox of Immigration. Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 3, 288304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmel, A., Cerami, A. and Papadopoulos, T. (eds.) (2012), Migration and Welfare in the New Europe: Social protection and the challenges of integration. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Chiswick, B. R. (1999), Are immigrants favourably self-selected? American Economic Review 89, 181185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, E. and Claus, I. (2010), Effects of Taxation on Migration: Some Evidence for the ASEAN and APEC Economies. Asian Development Review, 28, 1, 2250.Google Scholar
Corrigan, O. (2010), Migrants, Welfare Systems and Social Citizenship in Ireland and Britain: Users or Abusers? Journal of Social Policy, 39, 3, 415437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crepaz, M. M. L. (2008), Trust beyond Borders: Immigration, the Welfare State and Identity in Moderns Societies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cyr, J. (2015), The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus groups as a Data Collection Method. Sociological Methods & Research, 129.Google Scholar
Dancygier, R. and Saunders, E. N. (2006), A New Electorate? Comparing Preferences and Partisanship between Immigrants and Natives. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, 4, 962981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beer, P. and Koster, F. (2009) Sticking Together or Falling Apart? Solidarity in an Era of Individualization and Globalization. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Giorgi, G. and Pellizzari, M. (2009), Welfare migration in Europe. Labour Economics, 16, 353363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Haas, H. (2010), The internal dynamics of migration processes: A theoretical inquiry. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eger, M.A. (2010), Even in Sweden: The effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending. European Sociological Review, 26, 2, 203217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelen, E. (2003), How to combine openness and protection? Citizenship, Migration, and Welfare Regimes. Politics and Society, 31, 4, 503536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Finseraas, H. (2012), Anti-immigration attitudes, support for redistribution and party choice in Europe. In Kvist, J. et al., Changing social equality: The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century. Bristol: Policy.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. (1986), Migration and the political economy of the welfare state. The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 485, 1, 5163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, D. (2013), The British Dream: Successes and Failures of Post-War Immigration. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Giulietti, C. and Wahba, J. (2012), Welfare Migration. Working Paper, number 18. Southampton: Centre for Population Change.Google Scholar
Heitmueller, A. (2005), Unemployment benefits, risk aversion, and migration incentives. Journal of Population Economics, 18, 93112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtslag, J. W., Kremer, M. and Schrijvers, E. (2013), Making Migration Work. The future of labour migration in the European Union. Amsterdam; Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennissen, R. P. W. and Nicolaas, H. (eds.) (2014), De Nederlandse migratiekaart 2013. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Joppke, C. (1999), Immigration and the Nation State: The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B. and Brown, P. (2007) Migration and Work in the United Kingdom: Mobility and the Social Order. Mobilities, 2, 2, 255276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koning, E.A. (2013), Selective Solidarity: The politics of immigrants’ social rights in Western welfare states. PhD thesis. Queens’ University, Canada.Google Scholar
Kremer, M. (2013), Vreemden in de verzorgingsstaat. Hoe arbeidsmigratie en sociale zekerheid te combineren. Den Haag: Boom/Lemma.Google Scholar
Larsen, C.A. (2006), The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Larsen, C.A. (2011), Ethnic Heterogeneity and Public Support for Welfare: Is the US Experience Replicated in Britain, Sweden, and Denmark? Scandinavian Political Studies, 34, 4, 332353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. and Olsen, J. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York/London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1976, or. 1950), Citizenship and Social Class. Citizenship and Social Development. Westport: Greenwood Press Publishers.Google Scholar
Mau, S. and Burckhardt, C. (2009), Migration and welfare state solidarity in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 19, 3, 213229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2006), Multiculturalism and the Welfare state: Theoretical reflections. In Banting, K. and Kymlicka, W. (eds.), Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie (2013), Monitor Kennismigranten. Kwantitatieve analyse. Den Haag: Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie.Google Scholar
Morissens, A. and de Blander, R. (2011), Migrants’ attitudes toward government's responsibility for welfare provision and moral consequences of the welfare state in 12 European countries. Paper prepared for presentation at the Espanet conference, Valencia, September 8–10, 2011.Google Scholar
Nowotny, K. (2011), Welfare Magnets, Taxation and the Location Decisions of Migrants to the EU. Vienna: Austrian Institute of Economic Research.Google Scholar
OECD (2015), International Migration Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Razin, A., Sadka, E. and Suwankiri, B. (2011), Migration and the Welfare State. Political-Economy Policy Formation. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razin, A. and Wahba, J. (2011), Welfare magnet hypothesis, fiscal burden and immigration skill selectivity. NBER working paper series, 17515, 10.Google Scholar
Reeskens, T. and van Oorschot, W. (2012), Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 53, 2, 120139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (2012), Welfare States and Immigrant Rights. The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senik, C., Stichnoth, H. and van der Straeten, K. (2009), Immigration and Natives’ Attitudes towards the Welfare State: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research, 91, 345370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklair, L. (2001), The transnational capitalist class. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. W., Shamdasani, P. N. and Rook, D. (2007), Focus groups. Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolk, B. and Wouters, C. (1982), De gemoedsrust van de verzorgingsstaat. Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, 37, 6, 599613.Google Scholar
Soysal, Y. (2012), Citizenship, immigration, and the European social project: Rights and obligations of individuality. The British Journal of Sociology, 63, 1, 121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svallfors, S. (2006), The Moral Economy of Class: Class and Attitudes in Comparative Perspectives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2005), Is the future American? Can left politics preserve European welfare states from erosion through ‘racial diversity’? Journal of Social Policy, 34, 4, 661772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Martin, R. (2010), Fairness, Equality and Legitimacy: A Qualitative Comparative Study of Germany and the UK. Social Policy and Administration, 44, 1, 85103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Waal, J., van der, Koster, W. de. and van Oorschot, W. (2013 ), Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? Journal of comparative policy analysis, 15, 2, 118.Google Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. (2008), Solidarity towards immigrants in European welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 17, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, W. and Uunk, W. (2007), Welfare spending and the Public's Concern for immigrants. Comparative Politics 40, 1, 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Earned Citizenship: Labour Migrants’ Views on the Welfare State
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Earned Citizenship: Labour Migrants’ Views on the Welfare State
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Earned Citizenship: Labour Migrants’ Views on the Welfare State
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *