Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-mb7zs Total loading time: 0.479 Render date: 2021-06-19T21:46:21.158Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Paying for Children: The State's Changing Role and Income Adequacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2013

DONALD HIRSCH
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Social Policy (CRSP), Department of Social Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU email: donald.hirsch@googlemail.com
Corresponding

Abstract

In a number of countries, the state has become more closely involved in helping low-income families with children to make ends meet – including those with low earnings as well as out-of-work families. The adequacy of such support can be assessed against benchmarks measuring the additional cost of a child in households that maintain spending at a level sufficient to participate adequately in society. A socially defined minimum income standard provides an empirically based benchmark, which allows more meaningful measurement of adequacy than measures based on relative income or actual spending patterns.

Using evidence from the Minimum Income Standard for the United Kingdom, this paper considers the extent to which the UK state covers the additional cost of having children for non-working and low-earning families respectively. It finds that the present system has come close to covering this cost for some low-income families, but has started to withdraw from this position. The paper concludes by considering advantages and pitfalls for countries of adopting targeted forms of support for children focused on income adequacy. Such support can help working as well as non-working families escape poverty, but also makes them heavily dependent on state transfers to make ends meet.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Banks, J. and Johnson, P. (1993), Children and Household Living Standards, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battle, K. and Mendelson, M. (eds.) (2001), Benefits for Children: A Four Country Study, Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.Google Scholar
Bollinger, C., Nicolletti, C. and Pudney, S. (2012), Two Can Live as Cheaply as One, But Three's a Crowd, ISER Working Paper, Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J., Middleton, S., Davis, A., Oldfield, N., Smith, N., Cusworth, L. and Williams, J. (2008), A Minimum Income Standard for Britain – What People Think, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (2012), The Earned Income Tax Credit (policy briefing), http://www.cbpp.org/files/policybasics-eitc.pdf (accessed 16 August 2012).Google Scholar
Collins, M., Mac Mahon, B., Weld, G. and Thornton, R. (2012), A Minimum Income Standard for Ireland, Dublin: the Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Hirsch, D., Smith, N., Beckhelling, J. and Padley, M. (2012), A Minimum Income Standard for the UK in 2012 – Keeping Up in Hard Times, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Deeming, C. (2011), ‘Determining minimum standards of living and household budgets: methodological issues’, Journal of Sociology, 4, 1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Luca, G., Rossetti, C. and Vuri, D. (2012), In-work Benefits for Married Couples: An Ex-Ante Evaluation of EIC and WTC Policies in Italy, Discussion Paper No. 679, Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions (2010), Universal Credit: Welfare that Works, London: DWP.Google Scholar
Field, F. (2010), The Foundation Years: Preventing Poor Children Becoming Poor Adults, London: Independent Review on Poverty and Life Chances.Google Scholar
Gordon, D., Adelman, L., Ashworth, K., Bradshaw, J., Levitas, R., Middleton, S., Pantazis, C., Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P. and Williams, J. (2000), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Grant, S., Hoorens, S., Sivadeasan, S., Loo, M., DaVanzo, J., Hale, L., Gibson, S. and Butz, W. (2004), Low Fertility and Population Ageing, Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar
Hirsch, D. (2006), What Will It Take to End Child Poverty: Firing on all Cylinders, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Hirsch, D. and Beckhelling, J. (2011), Tackling the Adequacy Trap: Earnings, Incomes and Work Incentives under the Universal Credit, London: Resolution Foundation.Google Scholar
Hirsch, D., Sutton, L. and Beckhelling, J. (2012), The Cost of a Child in the Twenty-First Century, London: Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2011), Autumn Statement 2011, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
HM Treasury (2012), Autumn Statement 2012, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
LV (2012), Cost of a Child: From Cradle to College, 2012 Report, London: LV Corporate Communications.Google Scholar
Mack, J. and Lansley, S. (1985), Poor Britain, London: George Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
Mac Mahon, B., Weld, G., Thornton, R. and Collins, M. (2012), The Cost of a Child, Dublin: Vincentian Partnership for Social Justice.Google Scholar
Mendelson, M. (2005), Measuring Child Benefits: Measuring Child Poverty, Ottawa: Caledon Institute for Social Policy.Google Scholar
Middleton, S. (2000), ‘Agreeing poverty lines: the development of consensual budget standards methodology’, in Bradshaw, J. and Sainsbury, R. (eds.), Researching Poverty, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mikol, F. and Rémy, V. (2009), ‘RSA: peut-on apprendre des éxperiences étrangères? Un bilan des travaux sur l'Earned Income Tax Credit et le Working Family Tax Credit’, Travail et Emploi, 120: October–December, 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, K. and Stabile, M. (2008), Do Tax Benefits Affect the Wellbeing of Children? Evidence from Canadian Child Benefit Expansions, NBER working Paper No. 14624.Google Scholar
Nibud (2009), Handbook of Reference Budgets, Utrecht: Nibud.Google Scholar
OECD (2001), Society at a Glance – OECD Social Indicators, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2011), Doing Better for Families, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2012), Social Policies and Data, Paris: OECD, www.oecd.org/social/socialpoliciesanddata/benefitsandwagescountryspecificinformation.htm (accessed 9 August 2012).Google Scholar
Oldfield, N. (1993), The Cost of a Child: Living Standards for the 1990s, London: CPAG.Google Scholar
Oldfield, N. and Bradshaw, J. (2011), ‘The costs of a child in a low-income household’, Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 1: 2, 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, A., Phillips, M. and Robinson, C. (2007), Attitudes to Poverty: Findings from the British Social Attitudes Survey, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Rendimento Adequado em Portugal (Adequate Income in Portugal project) (2013), website, www.rendimentoadequado.org.pt (accessed 1 February 2013).Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (2004), Updated Budget Standard Estimates for Australian Working Families in September 2003, Report 1/04, University of New South Wales Social Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar
Shigekawa, J. and Yamada, A. (2012), ‘Measuring minimum income standards in Japan: applying the new British method, Social Policy and Labor Studies, 4: 1, 7184 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Smith, N., Davis, A. and Hirsch, D. (2011), A Minimum Income Standard for Guernsey, CRSP working paper 618, Loughborough: Centre for Research in Social Policy.Google Scholar
Van Mechelen, N. and Bradshaw, J. (2012), ‘Child poverty as government priority: child benefit packages for working families, 1992–2009’, in Marx, I. and Nelson, K. (eds.), Minimum Income Protection in Flux, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to the definition of poverty: towards and alternative methodology’, Journal of Social Policy, 16: 2, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteford, P. (2008), Assistance for Families: An Assessment of Australian Family Policies from an International Perspective, 10th Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
4
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Paying for Children: The State's Changing Role and Income Adequacy
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Paying for Children: The State's Changing Role and Income Adequacy
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Paying for Children: The State's Changing Role and Income Adequacy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *