Skip to main content Accessibility help

Controlling Homeless People? Power, Interventionism and Legitimacy



There is intense debate over the legitimacy of interventions which seek behavioural change on the part of street homeless people. ‘Hard’ measures, such as arresting people for begging, are particularly controversial, but ‘softer’ interventions such as motivational interviewing have also prompted objections on grounds that they are paternalistic. At the same time, the ‘non-interventionist’ stance of some service providers has been accused of perpetuating harmful street lifestyles. Inspired by Ruth Grant's philosophically informed interrogation of the ethics of incentives, we propose a normative framework for application in this field. Via systematic exploration of Grant's three ‘legitimacy standards’ (legitimate purpose, voluntary response, effects on character), and an additional outcome-focussed fourth (effectiveness, proportionality and balance), we attempt to unsettle any intuitive assumption that non-interventionist approaches are necessarily more morally defensible than interventionist ones. We also, however, explicate the high ethical and empirical bar required to justify social control measures.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Controlling Homeless People? Power, Interventionism and Legitimacy
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Controlling Homeless People? Power, Interventionism and Legitimacy
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Controlling Homeless People? Power, Interventionism and Legitimacy
      Available formats


This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (, which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Hide All
Allahyari, R. (2000), Visions of Charity: Volunteer Workers and Moral Community, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Amster, R. (2003), ‘Patterns of exclusion: sanitising space, criminalising homelessness’, Social Justice, 30, 195221.
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. S. (1963), ‘Decisions and non-decisions: an analytical framework’, American Political Science Review, 57, 641651.
Baggini, J. (2015), Freedom Regained: The Possibility of Free Will, London: Granta.
Bastalgi, F. (2008), ‘Conditionality in public policy targeted to the poor: promoting resilience?’ Social Policy and Society, 8, 1, 127140.
Berlin, I. (1969), Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bothfield, S. and Betzelt, S. (2013), ‘How do activation policies affect social citizenship? The issue of autonomy’, in Ramia, G., Farnsworth, K., Irving, Z. (eds) Social Policy Review 25: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 249270, Bristol: Policy Press.
Bowpitt, G., Dwyer, P., Sundin, E. and Weinstein, M. (2014), ‘Places of sanctuary for 'the undeserving'? Homeless people's day centres and the problem of conditionality’, British Journal of Social Work 44, 5, 12511267, doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs196
Buckingham, H. (2011), ‘Hybridity, diversity and the division of labour in the third sector: what can we learn from homelessness organisations in the UK?’, Voluntary Sector Review 2, 2, 157175.
Busch-Geertsema, V. (2013), Housing First Europe: Final Report, Bremen/Brussels: Housing First Europe.
Caplan, A. (2008), ‘Denying autonomy in order to create it: the paradox of forcing treatment upon addicts’, Addiction, 103, 19191921, doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02369.x
Cloke, P., May, J. and Johnsen, S. (2005), ‘Exploring ethos? Discourses of 'charity' in the provision of emergency services for homeless people’, Environment and Planning A, 37, 385402.
Cloke, P., May, J. and Johnsen, S. (2010), Swept Up Lives? Re-envisioning the homeless city, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Deacon, A. (2004), ‘Justifying conditionality: the case of anti-social tenants’, Housing Studies, 19, 6, 911926.
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2008), ‘Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health’, Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49, 3, 182185.
DeVerteuil, G., May, J. and von Mahs, J. (2009), ‘Complexity not collapse: recasting the geographies of homelessness in a 'punitive' age’, Progress in Human Geography, 33, 5, 646666.
DeVerteuil, G. (2014), ‘Does the punitive need the supportive? A sympathetic critique of current grammars of urban injustice’, Antipode, 46, 4, 874893.
Dobson, R. (2011), ‘Conditionality and homelessness services: “practice realities” in a drop-in centre’, Social Policy and Society, 10, 4, 547–57.
Dobson, R. (2015), ‘Power, Agency, Relationality and Welfare Practice’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 4, 687705, doi: 10.1017/S0047279415000318.
Epel, E., Bandura, A. and Zimbardo, P. (1999), ‘Escaping homelessness: the influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 3, 575596.
Fernandez Evangelista, G. and Jones, S. (2013), Mean Streets: A Report on the Criminalisation of Homelessness in Europe, Brussels: L'Imprimerie Chauveheid.
Fitzpatrick, S., Bramley, G. and Johnsen, S. (2013), ‘Pathways into multiple exclusion homelessness in seven UK cities’, Urban Studies, 50, 1, 148168.
Fitzpatrick, S., Bramley, G., Sosenko, F., Blenkinsopp, J., Johnsen, S., Littlewood, M., Netto, G. and Watts, B. (2016), Destitution in the UK, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Fitzpatrick, S. and Johnsen, S. (2009), ‘The use of enforcement to combat 'street culture' in England: An ethical approach?’ Ethics and Social Welfare, 3, 3, 284302.
Fitzpatrick, S., Johnsen, S. and White, M. (2011), ‘Multiple exclusion homelessness in the UK: key patterns and intersections’, Social Policy and Society, 10, 4, 501512.
Fitzpatrick, S. and Jones, A. (2005), ‘Pursuing social justice or social cohesion? Coercion in street homelessness policies in England’, Journal of Social Policy, 34, 3, 389406.
Flint, J. (2009), ‘Governing marginalised populations: the role of coercion, support and agency’, European Journal of Homelessness, 3, 247260.
Frankfurt, H. G. (1971), ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’, Journal of Philosophy, 68, 1, 520.
Goodin, B. (1995), ‘In Defence of the Nanny State’ in Etzioni, A. (ed.), Rights and the Common Good: Communitarian Perspectives, 125132, New York: St Martin's Press.
Grant, R. (2002), ‘The ethics of incentives: historical origins and contemporary understandings’, Economics and Philosophy, 18, 111139.
Grant, R. (2006), ‘Ethics and incentives: a political approach’, American Political Science Review, 100, 1, 2939.
Grant, R. (2012), Strings Attached: Untangling the Ethics of Incentives, Princeton: Russel Sage Foundation/Princeton University Press.
Greer, P. and Horst, C. (2014), Mission Drift: The Unspoken Crisis Facing Leaders, Charities, and Churches, Bethany House.
Gregory, J. (2015), ‘Engineering compassion: the institutional structure of virtue’, Journal of Social Policy, 44, 2, 339356.
Harris, S. (2012), Free Will, New York: Free Press.
Harrison, M. and Sanders, T. (Eds.) (2016), Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the ‘not-so-big' Society, Bristol: Policy Press.
Higgins, J. (1980), ‘Social control theories of social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 9, 1, 123.
Justice, Housing. (2008), Rough Sleeping: Compassion v Coercion: Church, Community and Government Responses, London: Housing Justice.
Johnsen, S. (2014), ‘Where's the ‘faith’ in ‘faith-based’ organisations? The evolution and practice of faith-based homelessness services in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 2, 413430.
Johnsen, S., Cloke, P. and May, J. (2005a), ‘Transitory spaces of care: serving homeless people on the street’, Health and Place. 11, 4, 323336.
Johnsen, S., Cloke, P. and May, J. (2005b), ‘Day centres for homeless people: spaces of care or fear?’ Social and Cultural Geography, 6, 6, 787811.
Johnsen, S. and Fitzpatrick, S. (forthcoming), ‘Faith, values and metaphysical positionality’, in Woodhead, L. (ed), How to Research Religion: Putting Methods Into Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnsen, S. and Fitzpatrick, S. (2010), ‘Revanchist sanitisation or coercive care? The use of enforcement to combat begging, street drinking and rough sleeping in England’, Urban Studies, 47, 8, 17031723.
Johnsen, S., Watts, B. and Fitzpatrick, S. (2016), First Wave Findings: homelessness. Welfare Conditionality: Sanctions, Support and Behaviour change project, York: University of York.
Johnsen, S. (2016), ‘Homelessness, social control and the ‘complex needs’ conundrum’, Paper presented at the Housing Studies Association conference, York, April 6-8.
Jones, R., Pykett, J. and Whitehead, M. (2013), Changing Behaviours: On the Rise of the Psychological State, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lancione, M. (2014), ‘Entanglements of faith: discourses, practices of care and homeless people in an Italian City of Saints’, Urban Studies, 51, 14, 30623078.
Lukes, S. (2005), Power: A Radical View, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Lunze, K., Idrisov, B., Golichenko, M. and Kamarulzaman, A. (2016), ‘Mandatory addiction treatment for people who use drugs: global health and human rights analysis’, BMJ 353, 2943, 15, doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2943
McNaughton Nicholls, C. (2009), ‘Agency, transgression and the causation of homelessness: A contextualised rational action analysis’, European Journal of Homelessness, 9, 1, 6984.
McNaughton Nicholls, C. (2010), ‘Housing, Homelessness and Capabilities’, Housing, Theory and Society, 27, 1, 2341.
Midgley, J. (2016), ‘Perspectives on responsibility in practice as revealed through food provisioning offers for rough sleepers’, Critical Social Policy, 36, 4, 610629.
Mill, J. S. (1860), On Liberty, London: John W.Parker & Son.
Mitchell, D. (1997), ‘The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homelessness laws in the United States’, Antipode, 29, 303336.
Morrison, D. (2009), ‘Homelessness as an independent risk factor for mortality: results from a retrospective cohort study’, International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, 877883.
Nagel, T. (1979), ‘The fragmentation of value’ in Mortal Questions, 128141, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NLCHP. (2014), No Safe Place: The Criminalization of Homelessness in U.S. Cities, NLCHP.
New, B. (1999), ‘Paternalism and public policy’, Economics and Philosophy, 15, 1, 6383.
Nussbaum, M. (1992), ‘Human functioning and social justice: in defence of Aristotelian essentialism’, Political Theory, 20, 2, 202246.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000), Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O'Sullivan, E. (2012), ‘Varieties of punitiveness in Europe: homelessness and urban marginality’, European Journal of Homelessness, 6, 2, 6997.
Parsell, C. (2011), ‘Responding to people sleeping rough: dilemmas and opportunities for social work’, Australian Social Work 64, 3, 330345.
Parsell, C., Fitzpatrick, S. and Busch-Geertsema, V. (2014), ‘Common Ground in Australia: An object lesson in evidence hierarchies and policy transfer’, Housing Studies, 29, 1, 6987.
Parsell, C. and Marston, G. (2016), ‘Supportive housing: justifiable paternalism?’ Housing, Theory and Society, 33, 2, 195216.
Randall, G. and Brown, S. (2002), Helping rough sleepers off the streets: A report to the Homelessness Directorate, London: ODPM.
Scanlon, C. and Adlam, J. (2008), ‘Refusal, social exclusion and the cycle of rejection: A cynical analysis’, Critical Social Policy, 28, 4, 529549.
Sen, A. (1992), Inequality Re-examined, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Shelter. (2005), Food for thought: soup-runs and soup kitchens, Shelter: London.
Smith, N. (1996), The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City, New York: Routledge.
Spicker, P. (1984), Stigma and Social Welfare, Beckenham: Croom Helm.
Stuart, F. (2014), ‘From ‘Rabble Management’ to ‘Recovery Management’: Policing Homelessness in Marginal Urban Space’, Urban Studies, 51, 9, 19091925. doi: 0042098013499798.
Sullivan, E., Harris, A. and Pfefferbaum, A. (2010), ‘Alcohol's effects on brain and behavior’, Alcohol Research and Health, 33, 1-2, 127143.
Tanekenov, A., Fitzpatrick, S. and Johnsen, S. (2017), 'Empowerment, capabilities and homelessness: the limitations of employment-focused social enterprises in addressing complex needs', Housing, Theory & Society, doi: 10.1080/14036096.2017.1290676.
Thomas, M. and Buckmaster, L.. (2010), Paternalism in Social Policy: When is It Justifiable? Canberra: Parliament of Australia.
Titmuss, R. (1997), The Gift Relationship, New York: The New York Press.
Wahab, S. (2005), ‘Motivational interviewing and social work practice’, Journal of Social Work, 5, 1, 4560.
Walter, Z.C., Jetten, J. Dingle, G.A., Parsell, C. and Johnstone, M. (2016), ‘Two pathways through adversity: Predicting well-being and housing outcomes among homeless service users’, British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 357374.
Watts, B. and Fitzpatrick, S. (forthcoming), Key Ideas: Welfare Conditionality. London: Routledge.
Watts, B. (2014), ‘Homelessness, empowerment and self-reliance in Scotland and Ireland: the impact of legal rights to housing for homeless people’, Journal of Social Policy, 43, 4, 793810, doi: 10.1017/S0047279414000282.
Webb, P. (2014), Homeless Lives in American Cities: Interrogating Myth and Locating Community, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, S. (2003), The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whiteford, M. (2010), ‘Hot tea, dry toast and the responsibilisation of homeless people’, Social Policy and Society, 9, 2, 193205.
Williamson, T. (2002), ‘Ethics of assertive outreach (assertive community treatment teams)’, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 15, 543547.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Controlling Homeless People? Power, Interventionism and Legitimacy



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.