Skip to main content

Doing It for the Kids? The Determinants of Attitudes towards Public Childcare in Unified Germany


In order to explain why people differ in their attitudes towards public childcare, we present a theoretical framework that integrates four causal mechanisms: regime socialisation, political ideology, family involvement and material self-interest. Estimation results obtained from multivariate regressions on the 2002 German General Social Survey and replications on the 2008/9 European Social Survey can be condensed into three statements: (1) Regime socialisation is the single most important determinant of attitudes toward public childcare, followed by young age as an indicator of self-interest and political ideology. Family involvement does not have any sizeable impact. (2) Regime socialisation conditions the impact of some indicators of political ideology and family involvement on attitudes toward public childcare. (3) Despite a paradigmatic shift in policy, the dynamics of 2008 mirror those of 2002, highlighting the stability of inter-individual differences in support. The results suggest that the ‘shadow of communism’ still stretches over what people in the East expect from the welfare state and that individual difference in the demand for public childcare appears to be highly path-dependent.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Alesina, A. and Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2007), ‘Good bye Lenin (or not?): the effect of communism on people's preferences’, The American Economic Review, 97: September, 1507–28.
Alwin, D. F., Braun, M. and Scott, J. (1992), ‘The separation of work and the family: attitudes towards women's labour-force participation in Germany, Great Britain, and the United States’, European Sociological Review, 8: 1, 1337.
Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L. and Newcomb, T. M. (1991), Political Attitudes over the Life Span: The Bennington Women after Fifty Years, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Andreß, H.-J. and Heien, T. (2001), ‘Four worlds of welfare state attitudes? A comparison of Germany, Norway, and the United States’, European Sociological Review, 17: 4, 337–56.
Andreß, H.-J., Heien, T. and Hofäcker, D. (2001), Wozu brauchen wir noch den Sozialstaat?, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Bartus, T. (2005), ‘Estimation of marginal effects using margeff’, The Stata Journal, 5: 3, 309–29.
Bengtson, V. L. and Roberts, R. E. L. (1991), ‘Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53: 4, 856–70.
Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003), ‘Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: a comparative analysis of 24 nations’, European Sociological Review, 19: 5, 415–27.
Boix, C. (1997), ‘Political parties and the supply side of the economy: the provision of physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–1990’, American Journal of Political Science, 41: 3, 814–45.
Bolzendahl, C. (2009), ‘Making the implicit explicit: gender influences on social spending in twelve industrialized democracies, 1980–99’, Social Politics, 16: 1, 4081.
Bolzendahl, C. and Olafsdottir, S. (2008), ‘Gender group interest or gender ideology? Understanding US support for family policy within the liberal welfare regime’, Sociological Perspectives, 51: 2, 281304.
Bonoli, G. (2005), ‘The politics of new social policies: providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states’, Policy & Politics, 33: 3, 431–9.
Bonoli, G. (2007), ‘Time matters – postindustrialization, new social risks, and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 40: 5, 495520.
Borck, R. and Wrohlich, K. (2008), ‘Preferences for childcare policies: theories and evidence’, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW) Discussion Paper, 827.
Böttcher, A., Krieger, S. and Kolvenbach, F.-J. (2010), ‘Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund in Kindertagesbetreuung’, Wirtschaft und Statistik, 2: 158–64.
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (2000), ‘Reciprocity, self-interest, and the welfare state’, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 26: 3353.
Boye, K. (2011), ‘Work and well-being in a comparative perspective – the role of family policy’, European Sociological Review, 27: 1, 1630.
Brewster, K. L. and Rindfuss, R. R. (2000), ‘Fertility and women's employment in industrialized nations’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 271–96.
Brooks, C. and Manza, J. (2007), Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Busemeyer, M. R., Goerres, A. and Weschle, S. (2009), ‘Demands for redistributive policies in an era of demographic aging: the rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries’, Journal of European Social Policy, 19: 3, 195212.
Cerami, A. and Vanhuysse, P. (eds.) (2009), Post-Communist Welfare Pathways: Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cooke, L. P. (2006), ‘Policy, preferences, and patriarchy: the division of domestic labor in East Germany, West Germany, and the United States’, Social Politics, 13: 1, 117–43.
Corneo, G. (2001), ‘Inequality and the state: comparing US and German preferences’, Annales d'Économie et de Statistique, 63/64: 283–96.
Corneo, G. and Grüner, H. P. (2002), ‘Individual preferences for political redistribution’, Journal of Public Economics, 83: 1, 83107.
Crompton, R., Brockmann, M. and Lyonette, C. (2005), ‘Attitudes, women's employment and the domestic division of labour: a cross-national analysis in two waves’, Work, Employment and Society, 19: 2, 213–33.
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Rehm, P. (2006), ‘Risks at work: the demand and supply sides of government redistribution’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22: 3, 365–89.
Daatland, S. O. (2001), ‘Ageing, families and welfare systems: comparative perspectives’, Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 34: 1, 1620.
Daatland, S. O. and Lowenstein, A. (2005), ‘Intergenerational solidarity and the family-welfare state balance’, European Journal of Ageing, 2: 174–82.
Durkheim, É. (1893), 23-01-09, De la division du travail social, Livre I. LES CLASSIQUES DES SCIENCES SOCIALES (electronic), from
Ellingsaeter, A. L. and Gulbrandsen, L. (2007), ‘Closing the childcare gap: the interaction of childcare provision and mothers’ agency in Norway’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 4, 649–69.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ferrarini, T. and Sjöberg, O. (2010), ‘Social policy institutions and health outcomes: transition countries in comparative perspective’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 19: S1, S60S88.
Garand, J. C. and Monroe, P. A. (1995), ‘Family leave legislation in the American States: toward a model of state policy adoption’, Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 16: 4, 341–63.
Gaulthier, A. (2007), ‘The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: a review of the literature’, Population Research and Policy Review, 26: 3, 323–46.
Gelissen, J. (2000), ‘Popular support for institutionalized solidarity: a comparison between European welfare states’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 9: 285300.
Ghysels, J. (2004), Work, Family and Childcare: An Empirical Analysis of European Households, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Goerres, A. (2009), ‘Die Einstellungen zu umverteilender Politik von einer starken Generation: die Babyboomer in Großbritannien und Westdeutschland im Vergleich’, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 19: 2, 205–35.
Goerres, A. and Tepe, M. (2010), ‘Age-based self-interest, intergenerational solidarity and the welfare state: a comparative analysis of older people's attitudes towards public childcare in 12 OECD countries’, European Journal of Political Research, 49: 6, 818–51.
Goerres, A. and Tepe, M. (2012), ‘The family and the welfare state: the impact of public provision for families on young people's demand for public childcare across 21 nations’, in Vanhuysse, P. and Goerres, A. (eds.), Ageing Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Politics and Policies, London: Routledge, pp. 178205.
Goerres, A. and Vanhuysse, P. (2012), ‘Mapping the field: comparative generational politics and policies in ageing democracies’, in Vanhuysse, P. and Goerres, A. (eds.), Ageing Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Politics and Policies, London: Routledge, pp. 122.
Hank, K. and Kreyenfeld, M. (2003), ‘A multilevel analysis of child care and women's fertility decisions in Western Germany’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 65: 3, 584–96.
Henninger, A., Wimbauer, C. and Dombrowski, R. (2008), ‘Demography as a push towards gender equality? Current reforms of German family policy’, Social Politics, 15: 3, 287314.
Hiilamo, H. and Kangas, O. (2009), ‘Trap for women or freedom to choose? The struggle over cash for child care schemes in Finland and Sweden’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 3, 457–75.
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘An asset theory of social policy preferences’, American Political Science Review, 95: 4, 875–93.
Jaeger, M. M. (2006), ‘Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: the regime hypothesis revisited’, European Sociological Review, 22: 2, 157–70.
Jaeger, M. M. (2009), ‘United but divided: welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution’, European Sociological Review, 25: 6, 723–37.
Jensen, C. (2009), ‘Institutions and the politics of childcare services’, Journal of European Social Policy, 19: 1, 718.
Korpi, W. (2000), ‘Faces of inequality: gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states’, Social Politics, 7: 127–91.
Lewis, J., Knijn, T., Martin, C. and Ostner, I. (2008), ‘Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s’, Social Politics, 15: 3, 261–86.
Ministry of Finance (2010), ‘Entwurf des Bundeshaushalts 2010 und der Finanzplan des Bundes 2009 bis 2013’,, accessed 19 April 2010.
Montanari, I. (2000), ‘From family wage to marriage subsidy and child benefits: controversy and consensus in the development of family support’, Journal of European Social Policy, 10: 4, 307–33.
Mood, C. (2010), ‘Logistic regression: why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it’, European Sociological Review, 26: 1, 6782.
Morel, N. (2007), ‘From subsidiarity to “free choice”: child- and elder-care policy reforms in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands’, Social Policy and Administration, 41: 6, 618–37.
Noailly, J. and Visser, S. (2009), ‘The impact of market forces on child care provision: insights from the 2005 Child Care Act in the Netherlands’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 3, 477–98.
Rehm, P. (2009), ‘Risks and redistribution: an individual-level analysis’, Comparative Political Studies, 42: 7, 855–81.
Roberts, J. (2011), ‘Trust and early years childcare: parents’ relationships with private, state and third sector providers in England’, Journal of Social Policy, 40: 4.
Roller, E. (1992), Einstellungen der Bürger zum Wohlfahrtsstaat in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Roller, E. (1996), ‘Abbau des Sozialstaats: Einstellungen der Bundesbürger zu Kürzungen von Sozialleistungen in den neunziger Jahren’, WZB Diskussionspapiere, FS III, 96-205.
Roller, E. (1999), ‘Shrinking the welfare state: citizens’ attitudes towards cuts in social spending in Germany in the 1990s’, German Politics, 8: 1, 2139.
Scheve, K. and Stasavage, D. (2008), ‘Religion and social insurance: evidence from the United States, 1970–2002’, in Donno, D., Shapiro, I. and Swenson, P. (eds.), Divide and Deal: The Politics of Distribution in Democracies, New York: New York University Press, pp. 149–85.
Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R. and Allen, H. M. (1980), ‘Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting’, The American Political Science Review, 74: 3, 670–84.
Sotiropoulou, V. and Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2007), ‘Childcare in post-communist welfare states: the case of Bulgaria’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 1, 141–55.
Starke, P., Obinger, H. and Castles, F. (2008), ‘Convergence towards where: in what ways, if any, are welfare states becoming more similar?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 15: 7, 9751000.
Sunström, E. (1999), ‘Should mothers work? Age and attitudes in Germany, Italy and Sweden’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 8: 3, 193205.
Svallfors, S. (1997), ‘Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: a comparison of eight western nations’, European Sociological Review, 13: 3, 283304.
Svallfors, S. (2003), ‘Welfare regimes and welfare opinions: a comparison of eight western countries’, Social Indicators Research, 64: 3, 495520.
Szydlik, M. (2000), Lebenslange Solidarität? Generationenbeziehungen zwischen erwachsenen Kindern und Eltern, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
Tepe, M. and Vanhuysse, P. (2010), ‘Elderly bias, new social risks, and social spending: change and timing in eight programs across four worlds of welfare, 1980–2003’, Journal of European Social Policy, 20: 3, 218–34.
Tucker, J. (2002), ‘The first decade of post-communist elections and voting: what have we studied, and how have we studied it?’, Annual Review of Political Science, 5: 271304.
Vanhuysse, P. and Goerres, A. (eds.) (2012), Ageing Populations in Post-Industrial Democracies: Comparative Studies of Politics and Policies, London: Routledge.
West, P. (1984), ‘The family, the welfare state and community care: political rhetoric and public attitudes’, Journal of Social Policy, 13: 417–46.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Appendix

Goerres Supplementary Appendix
Goerres Supplementary Appendix

 Word (78 KB)
78 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 69 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 309 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.