Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Welfare Dynamics and Employment: Heterogeneous Paths Through Means-tested Basic Income in Germany

  • KERSTIN BRUCKMEIER (a1), TORSTEN LIETZMANN (a1) and ANNA THERESA SAILE (a2)

Abstract

This study contributes to the international literature on welfare dynamics, by providing a differentiated picture of paths through the means-tested Basic Income for recipients who are capable of working, after the reorganisation of the basic income system in Germany in 2005. We analyse the employment and benefit trajectories of individuals who became recipients for the first time between 2007 and 2009 by methods of sequence and cluster analysis based on representative administrative individual data. We find a significant polarisation between long-term recipients and those with an early exit from benefit receipt via full-time employment. One in three new recipients remains in benefit receipt for the next years and shows almost no employment activities. Approximately 23 percent leave benefit receipt quickly and work in full-time employment. Several other different paths exist between these two poles. These heterogeneous trajectories should be characteristic for broad basic income systems and require a variety of policies that in part are beyond labour market policies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Welfare Dynamics and Employment: Heterogeneous Paths Through Means-tested Basic Income in Germany
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Welfare Dynamics and Employment: Heterogeneous Paths Through Means-tested Basic Income in Germany
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Welfare Dynamics and Employment: Heterogeneous Paths Through Means-tested Basic Income in Germany
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All
Abbott, A. and Tsay, A. (2000), ‘Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology. Review and prospects’, Sociological Methods and Research, 29, 333.
Achatz, J. and Trappmann, M. (2011), ‘Arbeitsmarktvermittelte Abgänge aus der Grundsicherung. Der Einfluss von personen- und haushaltsgebundenen Arbeitsmarktbarrieren’, IAB Discussion Paper, 2/2011.
Aisenbrey, S. and Fasang, A.E. (2010), ‘New life for old ideas: the ‘second wave’ of sequence analysis bringing the ‘course’ back into the life course’, Sociological Methods and Research, 38, 420462.
Andrén, T. and Gustafsson, B. (2004), ‘Patterns of social assistance receipt in Sweden’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 5568.
Anyadike-Danes, M. and McVicar, D. (2010), ‘My brilliant career: characterizing the early labor market trajectories of British women from generation X’, Sociological Methods and Research, 38, 482512.
Bane, M.J. and Ellwood, D.T. (1986), ‘Slipping into and out of poverty: the dynamics of spells’, Journal of Human Resources, 21, 1, 123.
Bane, M.J. and Ellwood, D.T. (1994), Welfare realities. From rhetoric to reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Blank, R.M. (1989), ‘Analyzing the length of welfare spells’, Journal of Public Economics, 39, 245273.
Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (Eds.) (2012), The politics of the new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bruckmeier, K., Graf, T. and Rudolph, H. (2010), ‘Working Poor: Arm oder bedürftig? - Umfang und Dauer von Erwerbstätigkeit bei Leistungsbezug in der SGB-II-Grundsicherung’, Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, 4, 3, 201222.
Buhr, P., Lietzmann, T. and Voges, W. (2010), ‘Lange Wege aus Hartz IV? Zur Dynamik von Mindestsicherung unter dem Bundessozialhilfegesetz und dem SGB II’, ZeS-Report, 15, 16.
Cameron, A.C. and Trivedi, P.K. (2005), Microeconometrics. Method and applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cappellari, L. and Jenkins, S.P. (2014), The dynamics of social assistance benefit receipt in Britain. In: Carcillo, S., Immervoll, H., Jenkins, S.P., Königs, S. and Tatsiramos, K. (Eds.), Safety nets and benefit dependence, Volume 39 of Research in Labour Economics, Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Carpentier, S., Neels, K. and Van den Bosch, K. (2014), ‘How do exit rates from social assistance benefit in Belgium vary with individual and local agency characteristics?’, Research in Labor Economics, 39, 151187.
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2012), Unemployment protection and labour market change in europe: Towards triple integration? In: Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (Eds.), Regulating the risk of unemployment: national adaptions to post-industrial labour markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Clasen, J. and Goerne, A. (2011), ‘Exit Bismarck, enter dualism? Assessing contemporary German labour market policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 40, 795810.
Dahl, E. and Lorentzen, T. (2003), ‘Dynamics of social assistance: the Norwegian experience in comparative perspective’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 289301.
Dingeldey, I. (2012), Germany: moving towards integration whilst maintaining segmentation. In: Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (Eds.), Regulating the risk of unemployment: national adaptions to post-industrial labour markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Dlouhy, K. and Biemann, T. (2015), ‘Optimal matching analysis in career research: a review and some best-practice recommendations’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 163173.
Dorner, M., Heining, J., Jacobebbinghaus, P. and Seth, S. (2010), ‘The sample of integrated labour market biographies’, Schmollers Jahrbuch, 130, 599608.
Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O., Konle-Seidl, R. and Reinhard, H.-J. (2008), Bringing the jobless into work? An introduction to activation policies. In: Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O., Konle-Seidl, R. (Eds.), Bringing the jobless into work? Experiences with activation schemes in Europe and the US, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Eichhorst, W., Grienberger-Zingerle, M. and Konle-Seidl, R. (2010), ‘Activating labor market and social policies in Germany: from status protection to basic income support’, German Policy Studies, 6, 1, 65106.
Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A. and Myles, J. (Eds.) (2002), Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gangl, M. (1998), ‘Sozialhilfebezug und Arbeitsmarktverhalten - Eine Längsschnittanalyse der Übergänge aus der Sozialhilfe in den Arbeitsmarkt’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 27, 3, 212232.
Grimm, N., Hirseland, A, and Vogel, B. (2013), ‘Die Ausweitung der Zwischenzone. Erwerbsarbeit im Zeichen der neuen Arbeitsmarktpolitik’, Soziale Welt, 64, 249268.
Gustafsson, B., Muller, R., Negri, N. and Voges, W. (2002), Paths through (and out of) social assistance. In: Saraceno, C. (Ed.), Social assistance dynamics in Europe, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Hansen, H.-T. and Lorentzen, T. (2018), ‘Work and welfare-state trajectories in Norway over two decades: Has the goal of getting more people into work been achieved?’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 2018; 00: 114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12354 .
Heidenreich, M. and Aurich-Beerheide, P. (2014), ‘European worlds of inclusive activation: the organisational challenges of coordinated service provision’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 23, 622.
Heidenreich, M., Petzold, N., Natili, M. and Panican, A. (2014), ‘Active inclusion as an organisational challenge: integrated anti-poverty policies in three European countries’, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 30, 180198.
Hoynes, H. W. (2000), ‘Local Labor markets and welfare spells: do demand conditions matter?’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 351368.
Jacobi, L. and Kluve, J. (2007), ‘Before and after the Hartz reforms: the performance of active labour market policy in Germany’, Journal of Labour Market Research, 40, 1, 4564.
Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P.J. (1990), Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.
Konle-Seidl, R., Rhein, T. and Trübswetter, P. (2014), Arbeitsmärkte im europäischen Vergleich: Erwerbslose und Inaktive in verschiedenen Sozialsystemen, IAB-Kurzbericht, 08/2014.
Kopf, E. and Zabel, C. (2017), ‘Activation programmes for women with a partner in Germany - Challenge or replication of traditional gender roles?International Journal of Social Welfare, 26, 239253.
Königs, S. (2018), ‘Micro-level dynamics of social assistance receipt: Evidence from four European countries’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 27, 2, 146156.
Künzel, S. (2012), ‘The local dimension of active inclusion policy’, Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 316.
Leibfried, S., Leisering, L., Buhr, P., Ludwig, M., Madje, E., Olk, T., Voges, W. and Zwick, M. (1995), Zeit der Armut. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Leisering, L. and Leibfried, S. (1999), Time and poverty in western welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lietzmann, T. (2014), ‘After recent policy reforms in Germany: probability and determinants of labour market integration of lone mothers and mothers with a partner who receive welfare benefits’, Social Politics, 21, 4, 585616.
Lietzmann, T. (2017), ‘The contribution of mothers’ employment on their family’s chances of ending welfare benefit receipt in Germany. Analysis of a two stage process’, Sociological Research Online, 22, 2, 121.
Marchal, S. and Van Mechelen, N. (2017), ‘a new kid in town? Active inclusion elements in European minimum income schemes’, Social Policy & Administration, 51, 171194.
Oschmiansky, F. and Ebach, M. (2009), Vom AFG 1969 zur Instrumentenreform 2009: Der Wandel des arbeitsmarktpolitischen Instrumentariums. In: Bothfeld, S., Sesselmeier, W. and Bogedan, C. (Eds.), Arbeitsmarktpolitik in der sozialen Marktwirtschaft, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Palier, B. and Thelen, K. (2010), ‘Institutionalizing dualism: complementarities and change in France and Germany’, Politics and Society, 38, 119148.
Pascual, A. S. and Magnusson, L. (Eds.) (2007), Reshaping welfare sates and activation regimes in Europe. Bruxelles: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
Rudolph, H., Graf, T., Koller, L. and Lietzmann, L. (2013), Anhang B2: Das Administrative Panel (AdminP)– Forschungsdaten mit Haushaltskontext zum SGB II. In: Dietz, M., Kupka, P. and Ramos Lobato, P. (Eds.), Acht Jahre Grundsicherung für Arbeitsuchende. Strukturen– Prozesse– Wirkungen, Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
Schels, B. (2011), ‘Young beneficiaries’ routes off benefits through labour market integration: the case of Germany’, Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarktforschung, 44, 261278.
Schels, B. (2013), ‘Persistence or transition: young adults and social benefits in Germany’, Journal of Youth Studies, 16, 7, 881900.
Seibert, H., Wurdack, A., Bruckmeier, K., Graf, T. and Lietzmann, T. (2017), Typische Verlaufsmuster beim Grundsicherungsbezug: Für einige Dauerzustand, für andere nur eine Episode, IAB-Kurzbericht, 04/2017.
Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (2016), Arbeitsmarkt in Zahlen, Bedarfsgemeinschaften und Personengruppen nach verschiedenen Merkmalen. Nürnberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit.
Studer, M. (2013), Weighted cluster library manual: a practical guide to creating typologies of trajectories in the social sciences with R. LIVES Working Papers, 24.
Taylor-Gooby, P., Gumy, J. M. and Otto, A. (2015), ‘Can “new welfare” address poverty through more and better jobs?Journal of Social Policy, 44, 83104.
Van Berkel, R. (2009), ‘The provision of income protection and activation services for the unemployed in ‘active’ welfare states. An international comparison’, Journal of Social Policy, 39, 1734.
Ward, J. H. (1963), ‘Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236244.
Zabel, C. (2016), Erwerbseintritte im Zeitverlauf bei Müttern junger Kinder im SGB II, IAB-Forschungsbericht 05/2016.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed