Home
• Aa
• Aa

A new “feasible” arithmetic

Abstract
Abstract

A classical quantified modal logic is used to define a “feasible” arithmetic whose provably total functions are exactly the polynomial-time computable functions. Informally, one understands ⃞∝ as “∝ is feasibly demonstrable”.

differs from a system that is as powerful as Peano Arithmetic only by the restriction of induction to ontic (i.e., ⃞-free) formulas. Thus, is defined without any reference to bounding terms, and admitting induction over formulas having arbitrarily many alternations of unbounded quantifiers. The system also uses only a very small set of initial functions.

To obtain the characterization, one extends the Curry-Howard isomorphism to include modal operations. This leads to a realizability translation based on recent results in higher-type ramified recursion. The fact that induction formulas are not restricted in their logical complexity, allows one to use the Friedman A translation directly.

The development also leads us to propose a new Frege rule, the “Modal Extension” rule: if ⊢ ∝ a then ⊢ A ↔ ∝ for new symbol A.

Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

[1]S. Abramsky , Computational interpretations of linear logic, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 111 (1993), pp. 357.

[3]S. Bellantoni and S. Cook , A new recursion-theoretic characterization of the polytime functions, Computational Complexity, vol. 2 (1992), pp. 97110.

[5]S. Bellantoni , K. H. Niggl , and H. Schwichtenberg , Ramification, modality, and linearity in higher type recursion, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, (2000).

[8]T. Coquand , Computational content of classical proofs, Semantics and logics of computation (A. Pitts and P. Dybjer , editors), Cambridge University Press, 1997.

[10]J. Y. Girard , A. Scedrov , and P. J. Scott , Bounded linear logic: a modular approach to polynomial-time computability, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 97 (1992), pp. 166.

[14]M. Hofmann , Safe recursion with higher types and BCK-algebras, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 104 (2000), pp. 113166.

[16]J. Krajicek , Bounded arithmetic, prepositional logic, and complexity theory, Cambridge University Press, 1995.

[20]E. Nelson , Predicative arithmetic, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986.

[23]S. Shapiro , Epistemic and intuitionistic arithmetic, Intensional mathematics (S. Shapiro , editor), Studies in Logic and The Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 113, North-Holland, 1985.

[24]H. Simmons , The realm of primitive recursion, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 27 (1988), pp. 177+.

Recommend this journal