Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-24T12:43:46.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HENRY CAREY’S RURAL ROOTS, “SCIENTIFIC AGRICULTURE,” AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE ANTEBELLUM NORTH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

Ariel Ron
Ariel Ron*
Affiliation:
Yale Center for the Study of Representative Institutions.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The American political economist Henry Charles Carey is generally thought of as a spokesman for industrialization due to his strident protectionism. In fact, his most original contributions came in his discussions of agriculture, the environment, and their relation to technological progress. Carey developed his ideas by drawing on the contemporary discourse of “scientific agriculture,” which enjoyed great influence, thanks to a widespread agricultural reform movement. This allowed him to argue effectively against Malthusian population doctrine and Ricardian rent theory by stressing the almost limitless potential of technological innovation, not only in manufactures but also in agriculture. Analogous views were also expressed by George Perkins Marsh, known today as the “father of conservationism,” indicating a broader contemporary engagement with questions of economic development and humanity’s relationship to nature, an engagement in some ways strikingly parallel to present-day concerns.

Type
Symposium: American Political Economy From the Age of Jackson to the Civil War
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 263 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Institute [of the City of New York]. 1844. Report on the Commercial Intercourse of the United States and Great Britain. New York: Jared W. Bell.Google Scholar
Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred. 1987. To Their Own Soil: Agriculture in the Antebellum North. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Barles, Sabine. 2007. “Feeding the City: Food Consumption and Flow of Nitrogen, Paris, 1801–1914.” Science of the Total Environment 375 (1–3): 48–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, L. Diane, Schoen, Brian, and Towers, Frank, F., eds. 2011. The Old South’s Modern Worlds: Slavery, Region, and Nation in the Age of Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barron, Hal S. 1984. Those Who Stayed Behind: Rural Society in Nineteenth-Century New England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beadie, Nancy. 2008. “Toward a History of Education Markets in the United States: An Introduction.” Social Science History 32 (1): 47–73.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles A., and Beard, Mary R.. [1933] 1962. The Rise of American Civilization. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Beckert, Sven. 2001. The Monied Metropolis: New York City and the Consolidation of the American Bourgeoisie, 1850–1896. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogue, Allan G. 1963. From Prairie to Corn Belt: Farming on the Illinois and Iowa Prairies in the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boserup, Ester. 1966. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth; the Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Boserup, Ester. 1981. Population and Technological Change: A Study of Long Term Trends. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brier, Carol E. 2013. “Tending Our Vines: From the Correspondence and Writings of Richard Peters and John Jay.” Pennsylvania History 80 (1): 85–111.Google Scholar
Carey, Henry C. 1837. Principles of Political Economy. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea & Blanchard.Google Scholar
Carey, Henry C. 1967a. The Harmony of Interests: Agricultural, Manufacturing & Commercial. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Carey, Henry C. 1967b. The Past, the Present, & the Future. New York: A. M. Kelley.Google Scholar
Carey, Mathew. 1824. Address Delivered Before the Philadelphia Society for Promoting Agriculture, at Its Meeting, on the Twentieth of July, 1824. Fourth edition. Philadelphia: Joseph R. A. Skerrett.Google Scholar
Cohen, Patricia Cline. 1999. A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conkin, Paul Keith. 1980. Prophets of Prosperity: America’s First Political Economists. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Conzen, Michael. 1971. Frontier Farming in an Urban Shadow: The Influence of Madison’s Proximity on the Agricultural Development of Blooming Grove, Wisconsin. Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin for the Department of History, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Cushman, Gregory T. 2013. Guano and the Opening of the Pacific World: A Global Ecological History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danhof, Clarence H. 1969. Change in Agriculture: The Northern United States, 1820–1870. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul R. 1968. The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. 1859. “The Farmer and His Aids.” In Sixth Annual Report of the Secretary of the Massachusetts Board of Agriculture. Boston: William White, pp. 11–19.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Stevenson Whitcomb. 1950. Pennsylvania Agriculture and Country Life, 1640–1840. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 1995. Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, John Bellamy. 1999. “‘Robbing the Earth of Its Capital Stock’: An Introduction to George Waring’s Agricultural Features of the Census of the United States for 1850.” Organization & Environment 12: 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, Paul Wallace. 1960. The Farmer’s Age: Agriculture, 1815–1860. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Go, Sun, and Lindert, Peter. 2010. “The Uneven Rise of American Public Schools to 1850.” The Journal of Economic History 70 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henretta, James A. 1978. “Families and Farms: Mentalité in Pre-Industrial America.” The William and Mary Quarterly 35 (1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Michael. 2010. “Political Origins of the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Soil Chemistry and International Trade Theory 1840–62.” In America’s Protectionist Takeoff, 1815–1914: The Neglected American School of Political Economy. New edition. Dresden: ISLET-Verlag, pp. 313–330.Google Scholar
Kaestle, Carl. 1983. Pillars of the Republic: Common Schools and American Society, 1780–1860. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Liebig, Justus. 1843. Familiar Letters on Chemistry and Its Relation to Commerce, Physiology and Agriculture. Edited by Gardner, John. New York: D. Appleton & Co.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Diane. 1978. Economic Development in the Philadelphia Region, 1810–1850. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
List, Friedrich. 1916. The National System of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. 2000. George Perkins Marsh, Prophet of Conservation. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Majewski, John. 2009. Modernizing a Slave Economy: The Economic Vision of the Confederate Nation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, George Perkins. 1848. Address Delivered before the Agricultural Society of Rutland County, Sept. 30, 1847. Rutland, VT: Herald Office.Google Scholar
Marsh, George Perkins. 2001. “The Study of Nature.” In Trombulak, Stephen C, ed., So Great a Vision: The Conservation Writings of George Perkins Marsh. Middlebury Bicentennial Series in Environmental Studies . Hanover, NH: Middlebury College Press/University Press of New England, pp. 73–97.Google Scholar
Marsh, George Perkins. 2003. Man and Nature. Edited by Lowenthal, David. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Frederick. 1975. “Bastiat and Carey.” In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works. Volume 28. New York: International Publishers, pp. 5–16.Google Scholar
McCoy, Drew R. 1982. The Elusive Republic: Political Economy in Jeffersonian America. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
McMurry, Sally. 1995. Transforming Rural Life: Dairying Families and Agricultural Change, 1820–1885. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Meardon, Stephen. 2011. “Reciprocity and Henry C. Carey’s Traverses on ‘the Road to Perfect Freedom of Trade.’” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 33 (3): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melillo, Edward D. 2012. “The First Green Revolution: Debt Peonage and the Making of the Nitrogen Fertilizer Trade, 1840–1930.” The American Historical Review 117 (4): 1028–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Roberta Balstad. 1979. City and Hinterland: A Case Study of Urban Growth and Regional Development. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Lewis B. 1990. History of the U.S. Fertilizer Industry. Edited by Parker, J. Harold. Muscle Shoals, AL: Tennessee Valley Authority.Google Scholar
Olmstead, Alan L., and Rhode, Paul Webb. 2008. Creating Abundance: Biological Innovation and American Agricultural Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkerson, Donald Hugh, and Parkerson, Jo Ann. 1998. The Emergence of the Common School in the U.S. Countryside. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, Emily. 2009. “‘The Balance-Sheet of Nature’: Calculating the New York Farm, 1820–1860.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Perelman, Michael. 1999. “Henry Carey’s Political-Ecological Economics: An Introduction.” Organization & Environment 12 (3): 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskin, Lawrence A. 2003. Manufacturing Revolution: The Intellectual Origins of Early American Industry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Peysson, A. 1851. Public Health and Agriculture. Philadelphia: J. H. Jones.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prude, Jonathan. 1983. The Coming of Industrial Order: Town and Factory Life in Rural Massachusetts, 1810–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1817. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Library of Economics and Liberty. www.econlib.org. Accessed February 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Roberts, Isaac Phillips. 1916. Autobiography of a Farm Boy. Albany, NY: J. B. Lyon Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ron, Ariel. 2012. “Developing the Country: ‘Scientific Agriculture’ and the Roots of the Republican Party.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Rossiter, Margaret W. 1975. The Emergence of Agricultural Science: Justus Liebig and the Americans, 1840–1880. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sabin, Paul. 2013. The Bet: Paul Ehrlich, Julian Simon, and Our Gamble over Earth’s Future. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Stanley K., and McShane, Clay. 1978. “To Engineer the Metropolis: Sewers, Sanitation, and City Planning in Late-Nineteenth-Century America.” The Journal of American History 65 (2): 389–411.Google Scholar
Seward, William Henry. 1884. The Works of William H. Seward. Edited by Baker, George E.. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Simmons, Dana. 2006. “Waste Not, Want Not: Excrement and Economy in Nineteenth-Century France.” Representations (96): 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, Steven. 2002. Larding the Lean Earth: Soil and Society in Nineteenth-Century America. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Tarr, Joel A. 1975. “From City to Farm: Urban Wastes and the American Farmer.” Agricultural History 49 (4): 598–612.Google Scholar
Vinovskis, Maris A. 1970. “Horace Mann on the Economic Productivity of Education.” The New England Quarterly 43 (4): 550–571.Google Scholar
Wines, Richard A. 1985. Fertilizer in America: From Waste Recycling to Resource Exploitation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar