Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T21:43:31.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Institutionalism and the History of Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Malcolm Rutherford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Being the President of a society such as this is a position that brings with it relatively few benefits. One very definite benefit it does confer, however, is the opportunity to address one's peers on a subject of one's choice, for an indefinite period of time, and with no fear of contradiction; no referees, no discussants, and not even any questions from the audience. I intend to make use of this unconstrained state by being somewhat more speculative in my remarks than I could otherwise be.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , Fall 1997 , pp. 178 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, William J. 1996. Designs Within Disorder: Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Economists, and the Shaping of Economic Policy, 1933–1945, Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1978. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 3d ed., Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Burns, E. M. 1931. “Does Institutional Economics Complement or Compete with ‘Orthodox’ Economics,” American Economic Review, supplement, 21, 03, 80–87.Google Scholar
Bye, Raymond T. 1940. “An Appraisal of F. C. Mills The Behavior of Prices,” Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences II, Social Science Research Council, New York.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1919. “Economic Theory in an Era of Social Readjustment,” American Economic Review, supplement, 9, 03, 280–290.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1921. “Soundings in Non-Euclidean Economics,” American Economic Review, supplement, 11, 03, 132–143.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1923. Studies in the Economics of Overhead Costs, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. 1927. “Recent Developments in Economics,” in Hayes, Edward C., ed., Recent Developments in the Social Sciences, Lippencott, Philadelphia, 213–306.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1984. “The New Institutional Economics,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140, 03, 229–231.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. 1900. “Discussion of the President's Address,” reprinted in Malcolm, Rutherford and Samuels, Warren J., eds., John R. Commons: Selected Essays, Routledge, London, 1996, 146–156.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. 1924. The Legal Foundations of Capitalism, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1968.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. 1934. Institutional Economics, Macmillan, New York. Copeland, Morris A. 1930. 1958. “Psychology and the Natural Science Point of View,” in Fact and Theory in Economics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 11–36.Google Scholar
Commons, John R. 1958. Fact and Theory in Economics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Davidson, Audrey B. and Ekelund, Robert B.. 1994. “America's Alternative to Marshall: Property, Competition, and Capitalism in Hadley's Economics of 1896,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 16, Spring, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorfman, Joseph. 1974. “Walton Hale Hamilton and Industrial Policy,” introduction to Hamilton, Walton H., Industrial Policy and Institutionalism: Selected Essays, Augustus M. Kelley, Clifton, 5–28.Google Scholar
Edie, Lionel D. 1927. “Some Positive Contributions of the Institutional Concept,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 41, 05, 405–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekelund, Robert B. and Robert F., Hébert. 1990. A History of Economic Theory and Method, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
PatrickGunning, J. Gunning, J.. 1996. “Herbert J. Davenport's Transformation of the Austrian Theory of Value and Cost,” presented at The History of Economics Society meeting, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Walton H., Hamilton 1919. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory,” American Economic Review, 9, 03, 309–318.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton H. ed. 1925. Current Economic Problems, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton H. and Wright, Helen R.. 1925. The Case Of Bituminous Coal, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton H. 1928. A Way of Order for Bituminous Coal, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Homan, Paul T. 1932. “An Appraisal of Institutional Economics,” American Economic Review, 22, 03 10–17.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1924. 1971. “The Limitations of Scientific Method in Economics,” in Tugwell, Rexford G., ed., The Trend of Economics, Kennikat Press, Port Washington, N.Y., 227–267.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1932. “The Newer Economics and the Control of Economic Activity,” Journal of Political Economy, 40, 08, 433–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1947. “Measurement Without Theory,” Review of Economic Statistics, 9, 08, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampman, Robert J., ed. 1993. Economists at Wisconsin, 1892–1992, University of Wisconsin System, Madison.Google Scholar
Landreth, Harry and Colander, David C.. 1994. History of Economic Thought, 3d ed., Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
Marschak, Jacob. 1941. “A Discussion on Methods in Economics,” Journal of Political Economy, 49, 06, 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1996. “Ronald Coase and American Institutionalism,” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 14, 51–92.Google Scholar
MillsFrederick, C. Frederick, C. 1927. The Behavior of Prices, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. 1913. Business Cycles, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. 1925. “Quantitative Analysis in Economic Theory,” American Economic Review, 15, 03, 1–12.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley C. 1928. “The Present Status and Future Prospects of Quantitative Economics,” American Economic Review, supplement, 18, 03, 39–41.Google Scholar
Oser, Jacob and Brue, Stanley L.. 1988. The Evolution of Economic Thought, 4th ed., Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego.Google Scholar
Rima, Ingrid H. 1996. Development of Economic Analysis, 5th ed., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rutherford, Malcolm. 1994. Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slichter, Sumner H. 1924. 1971. “The Organization and Control of Economic Activity,” in Tugwell, Rexford G., ed., The Trend of Economics, Kennikat Press, Port Washington, N.Y., 303–355.Google Scholar
Slichter, Sumner H. 1931. Modern Economic Society, H. Holt, New York.Google Scholar
Stewart, Walter W. 1919. “Economic Theory—Discussion,” American Economic Review, supplement, 9, 03, 319–320.Google Scholar
Tugwell, Rexford G., ed. 1924. The Trend of Economics, Kennikat Press, Port Washington, N.Y., 1971.Google Scholar
Viner, Jacob. 1928. “The Present Status and Future Prospects of Quantitative Economics,” American Economic Review, supplement, 18, 03, 30–36.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn A. 1929. “Economics,” in Wilson, Gee, ed., Research in the Social Sciences: Its Fundamental Methods and Objectives, Macmillan, New York, 53–80.Google Scholar