Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T12:28:19.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MODELS AND MATHEMATICS: HOW PIGOU CAME TO ADOPT THE IS-LM-MODEL REASONING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Norikazu Takami
Norikazu Takami*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, Japan. Email: takami.jp@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper investigates how Arthur Pigou came to adopt the reasoning essentially based on the working of the IS-LM model and to admit that money wage cuts are neutral to employment under the liquidity trap. This occurred through his involvement in the controversy with John Maynard Keynes in 1937–38. In the first instance, Pigou used a simple model to oppose Keynes’s assertion on such neutrality. Pigou (and Keynes too) applied verbal logical analysis to the model to derive his conclusions. Submitting a paper to the Economic Journal, Nicholas Kaldor analyzed Pigou’s model in mathematical terms and asserted that Pigou derived inconsistent conclusions from his model. Kaldor’s method eventually convinced Pigou, Keynes, and Dennis Robertson (who participated in the debate in correspondence). The paper thus argues that the controversy was concluded when one form of model analysis replaced another; specifically, when mathematical analysis replaced verbal logical analysis. This study provides a case study to the first category of Mary Morgan’s two functions of economic modeling: models as an object to inquire into and models as an object with which to inquire.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 169 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Unpublished Materials

Dennis Robertson Papers, Trinity College Library, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar

Published Materials

Ambrosi, G. M. 2003. Keynes, Pigou and Cambridge Keynesians: Authenticity and Analytical Perspective in the Keynes-classics Debate. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Aslanbeigui, N., and Oakes, G.. 2007. “The Editor as Scientific Revolutionary: Keynes, The Economic Journal, and the Pigou Affair, 1936–1938.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 29 (1): 15–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boumans, M. 2005. How Economists Model the World into Numbers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Champernowne, D. 1936. “Unemployment, Basic and Monetary: The Classical Analysis and the Keynesian.” Review of Economic Studies 3 (3): 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champernowne, D. 1959. “Arthur Cecil Pigou 1877–1959.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 122 (2): 263–265.Google Scholar
Collard, D. 1999. “Introduction.” In Pigou, A. C., Principles and Methods of Industrial Peace; Economic Science in Relation to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Collard, D. 2002. “Introduction.” In A.C. Pigou: Journal Articles. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Duarte, P. G. 2009a. “Frank P. Ramsey: A Cambridge Economist.” History of Political Economy 41 (3): 445–470.Google Scholar
Duarte, P. G., ed. 2009b. “Frank Ramsey’s Notes on Saving and Taxation.” History of Political Economy 41 (3): 471–489.Google Scholar
Hansen, A. H. 1939. “Economic Progress and Declining Population Growth.” American Economic Review 29 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1937. “Prof. Pigou on Money Wages in Relation to Unemployment.” Economic Journal 47 (188): 745–753.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. 1941. “Reviews. Employment and Equilibrium.” Economic Journal 51 (204): 458–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. [1936] 1973. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1937. “Prof. Pigou on Money Wages in Relation to Unemployment.” Economic Journal 47 (188): 743–745.Google Scholar
Laidler, D. 1999. Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution: Studies of the Inter-war Literature on Money, the Cycle, and Unemployment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1986. “Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands.” In Long, E. and Kuklick, H., eds., Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present. Volume 6. Oxford, UK: Jai Press, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Moggridge, D., ed. 1973a. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Vol. 13: The General Theory and After. 1: Preparation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moggridge, D., ed. 1973b. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Vol. 14: The General Theory and After. 2: Defence and Development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. 2012. The World in the Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patinkin, D. 1948. “Price Flexibility and Full Employment.” American Economic Review 38 (4): 543–564.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1917. “The Value of Money.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 32 (1): 38–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1920. “The Exchange and the Bank Rate.” The Times, Feb. 12, 1920.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1927. “Wage Policy and Unemployment.” Economic Journal 37 (147): 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1936. “Mr. JM Keynes’ General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.” Economica 3 (10): 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1937. “Real and Money Wage Rates in Relation to Unemployment.” Economic Journal 47 (187): 405–422.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1938. “Money Wages in Relation to Unemployment.” Economic Journal 48 (189): 134–138.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1941. Employment and Equilibrium: A Theoretical Discussion. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1943. “The Classical Stationary State.” Economic Journal 53 (212): 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1947. “Economic Progress in a Stable Environment.” Economica, New Series, 14 (55): 180–188.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. [1905] 1999a. Principles and Methods of Industrial Peace. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. [1913] 1999b. Unemployment. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. [1933] 1999c. The Theory of Unemployment. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. [1935] 1999d. The Economics of Stationary States. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rubin, G. 2005. “Patinkin and the Pigou Effect: Or How a Keynesian Came to Accept an Anti-Keynesian Argument.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1): 47–72.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. 1941. “Professor Pigou’s Employment and Equilibrium.” The American Economic Review 31 (3): 545–552.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. 1992. John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Saviour, 1920–1937. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stamp, J. 1931. “The Report of the Macmillan Report.” Economic Journal 41 (163): 424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takami, N. 2011. “Pigou on Business Cycles and Unemployment: An Anti-gold-standard View.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18 (2): 235–247.Google Scholar
Young, W. 1987. Interpreting Mr. Keynes: The IS-LM Enigma. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar