Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-l48q4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-25T13:57:25.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical validity of the Chinese version of Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in differentiating dementia of Alzheimer's type in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2003

Chan Agnes S.*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Choi Angel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Chiu Helen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lam Linda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
*
Reprint requests to: Agnes Chan, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., China. E-mail: aschan@psy.cuhk.edu.hk

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the clinical validity and applicability of the Chinese version of Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (CDRS) for elderly Chinese individuals. The scale was found to have good reliability with internal consistency ranging from 0.7 to 0.9. Its significant correlation with the Chinese version of Mini-Mental State Examination (CMMSE) suggested satisfactory construct validity of the scale. The discriminant validity of the CDRS in differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and Normal Control (NC) elderly was also supported by the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis. Several cut-off points were presented for different clinical or research applications, and formulas to adjust for the age and educational level of the CDRS total score were provided. The Initiation/Perseveration and Memory subscales were suggested to be an abbreviated version of the CDRS for a quick screening. The present results also showed the association between the impairment of the CDRS performance and the progress of the AD. (JINS, 2003, 9, 45–55.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.Google Scholar
Banich, M.T. (1997). Neuropsychology: The neural bases of mental function. USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B.E., & Roth, M. (1968). The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral gray matter of elderly subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramelli, P., Poissant, A., Gauthier, S., Bellavance, A., Gauvreau, D., Lecours, A.R., & Joanette, Y. (1997). Educational level and neuropsychological heterogeneity in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 11, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, D.A., Salmon, D.P., Bondi, M.W., Butters, N., Johnson, S.A., Wiederholt, W.C., & Connor, E. (1997). A population-based analysis of qualitative features of the neuropsychological test performance of individuals with Dementia of the Alzheimer type: Implications for individuals with Questionable Dementia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, A.S., Choi, M.K., & Salmon, D.P. (2001). The effect of age, gender and culture on Chinese and American versions of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 56, 356–363.10.1093/geronb/56.6.P356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, H., Lam, L., Chi, I., Leung, T., Li, S.W., Law, W.T., Chung, D., Fung, H., Kan, P.S., Lum, C.M., Ng, J., & Lau, J. (1998). Prevalence of dementia in Chinese elderly in Hong Kong. Neurology, 50, 1002–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, H.F.K., Lee, H.C., Chung, W.S., & Kwong, P.K. (1994). Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of Mini-Mental State Examination—A preliminary study. Journal of Hong Kong College of Psychiatry, 4, 25–28.Google Scholar
Cohen-Mansfield, J., Reisberg, B., Bonnema, J., Berg, L., Dastoor, D.P., Peffer, R.I., & Cohen, G.D. (1996). Staging methods for the assessment of dementia: Perspectives. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 57, 190–198.Google Scholar
Connor, D.J., Salmon, D.P., Snady, T.S., Galasko, D., Hansen, L.A., & Thal, L.J. (1998). Cognitive profiles of autopsy-confirmed Lewy body variant vs pure Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology, 55, 994–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidl, W., Schmidt, R., Stronegger, W.J., Fazekas, F., & Reinhart, B. (1996). Sociodemographic predictors and concurrent validity of the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 246, 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidl, W., Schmidt, R., Stronegger, W.J., Fazekas, F., & Reinhart, B. (1997). The impact of sociodemographic, environmental, and behavioral factors, and cerebrovascular risk factors as potential predictors of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 52, M111–M116.Google Scholar
Fuld, P.A., Muramoto, O., Blau, A., Westbrook, L., & Katzman, R. (1988). Cross-cultural and multi-ethnic dementia evaluation by mental status and memory testing. Cortex, 24, 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R., Oliver-Munoz, S., Fisher, L., & Empting, L. (1981). Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: Internal reliability study using a diffusely impaired population. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorp, W.G., Marcotte, T.D., Sultzer, D., Hinkin, C., Mahler, M., & Cummings, J.L. (1999). Screening for dementia: Comparison of three commonly used instruments. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R.C., Woodard, J.L., & Green, J. (1995). Validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale for detection of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 7, 357–359.10.1176/jnp.7.3.357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L.R., Klauber, M.R., Salmon, D.P., Yu, E.S.H., Liu, W.T., Zhang, M., & Katzman, R. (1993). Functional status, education, and the diagnosis of dementia in the Shanghai survey. Neurology, 43, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, M.G., Russo, J., Vitaliano, P.P., Prinz, P.N., Vitiello, M.V., & Yi, S.R. (1989). Initiation and perseveration as a subscale of the Dementia Rating Scale. Clinical Gerontologist, 8, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofer, S.M., Piccinin, A.M., & Hershey, D. (1996). Analysis of structure and discriminative power of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 395–409.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, D.M., Sano, M., Albert, S., Schofield, P., Dooneief, G., & Stern, Y. (1997). Cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment: A comparison of randomly selected, demographically matched cohorts of English- and Spanish-speaking older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 3, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, D.M., Sano, M., Dooneief, G., Marder, K., Bell, K.L., & Stern, Y. (1995). Neuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology, 45, 957–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagger, C. & Clake, M. (1992). Screening for dementia—A comparison of two tests using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 7, 659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, H., Zhang, M., Qu, O., Wang, Z., Salmon, D.P., Katzman, R., Grant, I., Liu, W.T., & Yu, E. (1989). Cross-cultural studies of dementia: Use of a Chinese version of the Blessed-Roth information-Memory-concentration test in a Shanghai dementia survey. Psychology and Aging, 4, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R.M. & Saccuzzo, D.P. (1993). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (3rd ed). California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Katzman, R. (1993). Education and the prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 43, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzman, R., Zhang, M., Qu, O., Wang, Z., Liu, W.T., Yu, E., Wong, S., Salmon, D.P., & Grant, I. (1988). A Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination: Impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 971–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittner, S.J., White, L.R., Farmer, M.E., Wolz, M., Kaplan, E., Moes, E., Brody, J.A., & Feinleib, M. (1986). Methodological issues in screening for dementia: The problem of education adjustment. Journal of Chronic Disability, 39, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, C.K., Lai, C.L., Tai, C.T., Lin, R.T., Yen, Y.Y., & Howng, S.L. (1998). Incidence and subtypes dementia in southern Taiwan: Impact of socio-demographic factors. Neurology, 50, 1572–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, J.A., Ivnik, R.J., Smith, S.E., Bohac, D.L., Tangalos, E.G., Kokmen, E., Gradd-Radford, N.R., & Petersen, R.C. (1998). Normative data for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 20, 536–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcopulos, B.A., McLain, C.A., & Giuliano, A.J. (1997). Cognitive impairment or inadequate norms? A study of healthy, rural, older adults with limited education. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattis, S. (1976). Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patients. In L. Bellack & T.E. Karasu (Eds.), Geriatric psychiatry (pp. 77–121). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Monsch, A.U., Bondi, M.W., Salmon, D.P., Butters, N., Thal, L.J., Hansen, L.A., Wiederholt, W.C., Cahn, E.A., & Klauber, M.R. (1995). Clinical validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in detecting dementia of the Alzheimer type. Archives of Neurology, 52, 899–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J.M., Berwick, D.M., Weinstein, M.C., Borus, J.F., Budman, S.H., & Klerman, G.L. (1987). Performance of screening and diagnostic tests: Application of Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 550–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolo, A.M., Troster, A.I., Glatt, S.L., Hubble, J.P., & Koller, W.C. (1995). Differentiation of the dementia of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease with the Dementia Rating Scale. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 8, 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen, J.S., Butters, N., Sadek, J.R., Johnson, S.A., Salmon, D.P., Swerdlow, N.R., & Swenson, M.R. (1995). Distinct cognitive profiles of cortical and subcortical dementia in advanced illness. Neurology, 45, 951–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisberg, B. (1986). Dementia: A systematic approach to identifying reversible causes. Geriatrics, 41, 30–46.Google Scholar
Reisberg, B. (1988). Functional Assessment Staging (FAST). Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 653–659.Google Scholar
Reisberg, B., Ferris, S.H., Leon, M., & Crook, T. (1988). Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 661–663.Google Scholar
Ritchie, K. & Fuhrer, R. (1992). A comparative study of the performance of screening tests for Senile dementia using Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosser, A.E. & Hodges, J.R. (1994). The Dementia Rating Scale in Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Journal of Neurology, 241, 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, D.P., Jin, H., Zhang, M., Grant, I., & Yu, E. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment of Chinese elderly in the Shanghai dementia survey. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, D.P., Riekkinen, P.J., Katzman, R., Zhang, M., Jin, H., & Yu, E. (1989a). Cross-cultural studies of dementia: A comparison of Mini-Mental State Examination performance in Finland and China. Archives of Neurology, 46, 769–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, D.P., Thal, L.J., Butters, N., & Heindel, W.C. (1990). Longitudinal evaluation of dementia of the Alzheimer type: A comparison of 3 standardized mental status examinations. Neurology, 40, 1225–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, D.P., Yuen, K.O., Heindel, W.C., Butters, N., & Thal, L.J. (1989b). Differentiation of Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease with the Dementia Rating Scale. Archives of Neurology, 46, 1204–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., Freidl, W., Fazekas, F., Reinhart, B., Grieshofer, P., Koch, M., Eber, B., Schumacher, M., Polmin, K., & Lechner, H. (1994). The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: Normative data from 1,001 healthy volunteers. Neurology, 44, 964–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shay, K.A., Kuke, L.W., Conboy, T., Harrell, L.E., Callaway, R., & Folks, D.G. (1991). The clinical validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in staging Alzheimer's dementia. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 4, 18–25.Google Scholar
Smith, G.E., Ivnik, R.J., Malec, J.F., Kokmen, E., Tangalos, E., & Petersen, R.C. (1994). Psychometric properties of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. Assessment, 1, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swets, J.A., Pickett, R.M., Whitehead, S.F., Getty, D.J.Schnur, J.A.Swets, J.B., & Freeman, B.A. (1979). Assessment of diagnostic technologies: Advanced measurement methods are illustrated in a study of computed tomography of the brain. Science, 205, 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troster, A.I., Moe, K.E., Vitiello, M.V., & Prinz, P.N. (1994). Predicting long-term outcome in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease with the Dementia Rating Scale. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 6, 54–57.Google Scholar
Vanderploeg, R.D., Axelrod, B.N., Sherer, M., Scott, J., & Adams, R.L. (1997). The importance of demographic adjustments on neuropsychological test performance: A response to Reitan and Wolfson (1995). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vangel, S.J., Jr. & Lichtenberg, P.A. (1995). Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: Clinical utility and relationship with demographic variables. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 9, 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitaliano, P.P., Breen, A.R., Russo, J., Albert, M., Vitiello, M.V., & Prinz, P.N. (1984). The clinical utility of the Dementia Rating Scale for assessing Alzheimer patients. Journal of Chronological Disease, 37, 743–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodard, J.L., Salthouse, T.A., Godsall, R.E., & Green, R.C. (1996). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Psychological Assessment, 8, 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar