Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T23:38:06.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The phonetic status of the (inter)dental approximant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2010

Kenneth S. Olson
Affiliation:
SIL International & University of North DakotaKen_Olson@sil.org
Jeff Mielke
Affiliation:
University of Ottawajmielke@uottawa.ca
Josephine Sanicas-Daguman
Affiliation:
Translators Association of the PhilippinesJosephine_Daguman@sil.org
Carol Jean Pebley
Affiliation:
SIL InternationalCarol_Pebley@sil.org
Hugh J. Paterson III
Affiliation:
SIL International & University of North DakotaHugh_Paterson@sil.org

Abstract

The (inter)dental approximant is a little-studied speech sound in the Philippines and Western Australia. In this paper, we document the articulation of the sound, providing acoustic and video data from Kagayanen and Limos Kalinga, respectively. The sound is attested in at least fifteen languages. It is contrastive in five Western Australian languages, while in the Philippines it generally patterns as an allophone of /l/ but has emerged recently as a separate phoneme due to contact. It arose independently in the two regions. The sound is easily describable in terms of values of phonological features or phonetic parameters. All of these factors argue for the inclusion of the sound in the International Phonetic Alphabet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaar, Alexander. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: A historical perspective. In Adelaar, Alexander & Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (Routledge Language Family Series), 142. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aoyama, Katsura & Reid, Lawrence A.. 2006. Cross-linguistic tendencies and durational contrasts in geminate consonants: An examination of Guinaang Bontok geminates. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36 (2), 145157.Google Scholar
Arcenas, Erika. 2004. Drop of labial flap in Kalagan and its consequences in orthography. Ms., SIL Philippines.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia. 1999. Cypriot Greek. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 29 (2), 173178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor-Samuel, John T. 1961. The verbal piece in Jebero (Linguistic Circle of New York Monograph 4). New York: Linguistic Circle of New York. [Supplement to Word – Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York, vol. 17, December 1961.]Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2001. Nhanda: An aboriginal language of Western Australia (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 30). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 2004. Historical linguistics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carbonell, Joan F. & Llisterri, Joaquim. 1999. Catalan. In IPA, 61–65.Google Scholar
Carr, Philip. 1999. English phonetics and phonology: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
de la Cruz, Beato A. & Zorc, R. David Paul. 1968. A study of the Aklanon dialect, vol. 1: Grammar. Kalibo, Aklan: Public Domain.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan. 1995. Martuthunira: A language of the Pilbara region of Western Australia (Pacific Linguistics C–125). Canberra: Australian National University. http://www.linguistics.uwa.edu.au/staff/alan_dench/martuthunira (2 November 2009).Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark & Roque, Lila San. 2004. I'saka: A sketch grammar of a language of north-central New Guinea (Pacific Linguistics 554). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dumatog, Lito & Dumatog, Vicky. 2006. Lubuagan Kalinga. Ms., Translators Association of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Elkins, Richard E. 1974. A Proto-Manobo word list. Oceanic Linguistics 13, 601641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1982. Phonetic rarities in Pirahã. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 12 (2), 9496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallman, Andrew F. 1974. A reconstruction of proto-Mansakan. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Gallman, Andrew F. 1979. Proto-South-East Mindanao and its internal relationships. Papers in Philippine Linguistics 10 (Pacific Linguistics A–55), 152. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Gallman, Andrew F. 1997. Proto East Mindanao and its internal relationships (Linguistic Society of the Philippines Special Monograph 44). Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Gieser, C. Richard. 1958. The phonemes of Kalinga. In Capell, Arthur & Wurm, Stephen A. (eds.), Studies in Philippine linguistics by members of the Summer Institute of Linguistics (Oceania Linguistic Monographs 3), 1023. Sydney: University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Grayden, Bruce. 1979. The Southern Kalinga /l/. Papers in Philippine Linguistics 9 (Pacific Linguistics A–50), 91100. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Grønnum, Nina. 1998. Danish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 28 (1–2), 99105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, Carol W. 1977. Kagayanen and the Manobo subgroup of Philippine languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2005. The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPA. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1975. Paralanguage and kinesics (nonverbal communication). Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. A course in phonetics, 4th edn. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2007. Articulatory features for describing lexical distinctions. Language 83 (1), 161180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Everett, Daniel L.. 1996. The status of phonetic rarities. Language 72 (4), 794800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com (2 November 2009).Google Scholar
MacGregor, Louise A. 1995. Kagayanen: Introduction and wordlist. In Tryon (ed.), 363–368.Google Scholar
Machlan, Glenn. 2000. Mastery check of Neville Thomas’ ‘Phonemic analysis of Kalinga: Tanudan’. Ms., SIL Philippines.Google Scholar
Magangat, Ignacio. 2006. Majukayong. Ms., Translators Association of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Martínez-Celdrán, Eugenio. 2004. Problems in the classification of approximants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34 (2), 201210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Celdrán, Eugenio, Fernández-Planas, Ana Ma. & Carrera-Sabaté, Josefina. 2003. Castilian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33 (2), 255260.Google Scholar
McFarland, Curtis Daniel. 1974. The dialects of the Bikol area. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1988. Handbook of Kimberley languages, vol. 1: General information (Pacific Linguistics C–105). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Mijares, Alfred & Mijares, Racquel. 2006. Butbut Kalinga. Ms., Translators Association of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Mott, Brian. 2007. Chistabino (Pyrenean Aragonese). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (1), 103114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S. & Hajek, John. 2003. Crosslinguistic insights on the labial flap. Linguistic Typology 7 (2), 157186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S., Machlan, Glenn & Amangao, Nelson. 2008. Minangali (Kalinga) digital wordlist: Presentation form. Language Documentation & Conservation 2 (1), 141156. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/1772 (2 November 2009).Google Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S. & Mielke, Jeff. 2007a. Articulation of the Kagayanen interdental approximant: An ultrasound study. Presented at the Linguistic Society of America annual meeting, January 2007, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S. & Mielke, Jeff. 2007b. Acoustic properties of the Kagayanen vowel space. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.), 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 610 August 2007, 845–848. Saarbrücken: University of Saarland. http://www.icphs2007.de/conference/Papers/1618/1618.pdf (2 November 2009).Google Scholar
Olson, Kenneth S. & Mielke, Jeff. 2008. Acoustic properties of the interdental approximant in Kagayanen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (5), 3460.Google Scholar
Paulian, Christiane. 1975. Le kukuya – langue teke du Congo (phonologie; classes nominales) (Bibliothèque de la SELAF 49–50). Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas. 1978. The comparative method applied to a problem of phonological merger in four central Philippine languages. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1943. Phonetics: A critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Ladusaw, William A.. 1996. Phonetic symbol guide, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Regueira, Xosé L. 1999. Galician. In IPA, 82–85.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A. 1963. Phonology of Central Bontoc. Journal of the Polynesian Society 72 (1), 2126.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Alan. 2000. Bunuba. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Blake, Barry J. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages 5, 34152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryder, Frank G. 1940. Variant [ɣ] in the Aklan dialect of Bisayan. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters 26 (4), 573583.Google Scholar
Scheerer, Otto. 1920. Über einen bemerkenswerten L-Stellvertreter im Dialekt von Aklan auf der Insel Panay (Filipinen). Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 11, 241259.Google Scholar
Schumacher, Ronald L. & Schumacher, Donna. 1978. Proto-Manobo *l in Agusan Manobo. Studies in Philippine Linguistics 2 (1), 183190.Google Scholar
Shahin, Kimary N. 2002. Postvelar harmony (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Shetler, Joanne. 1976. Notes on Balangao grammar (Language Data, Asian-Pacific Series 9). Huntington Beach, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Svelmoe, Gordon & Svelmoe, Thelma. 1974. Notes on Mansaka grammar (Language Data, Asian-Pacific Series 6). Huntington Beach, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
The Unicode Consortium. 2007. The Unicode standard, version 5.0, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tryon, Darrell T. (ed.). 1995. Comparative Austronesian dictionary: An introduction to Austronesian studies, part 1: fascicle 1 (Trends in Linguistics. Documentation 10). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiens, Hartmut. 1976. Phonological features of Limos Kalinga, with comments on affected speech. Philippine Journal of Linguistics 7 (1), 3847.Google Scholar
Wordick, F. J. F. 1982. The Yindjibarndi language (Pacific Linguistics C–71). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wrigley, Matthew. 1991. Community involvement in orthography development: Devising an orthography for Bunuba. Notes on Literacy 17 (3), 1924.Google Scholar
Zorc, R. David. 1995. Aklanon. In Tryon (ed.), 343–350.Google Scholar