Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T04:00:02.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biology of Praunus Flexuosus and P. Neglectus [Crustacea, Mysidacea]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. Mauchline
J. Mauchline
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, Oban, Argyll
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The biology of Praunus flexuosus (Müller) is closely similar to that of P. neglectus (G. O. Sars). In both species the over-wintering population matures and breeds in the early spring and summer to produce a spring generation of young which are evident in the population in May or June. The members of the over-wintering population die off in July or August. Some members of the spring generation become sexually mature and breed in the early autumn. The progeny of this autumn breeding, along with the bulk of the spring generation, form the over-wintering population. These species are omnivorous feeding on animal and plant debris and also preying on small crustaceans, very frequently harpacticid copepods. The maximum brood size found in P. flexuosus was 63 and in P. neglectus was 81. The biology of the populations on the west coast of Scotland is briefly compared with that of populations in Port Erin, Isle of Man, in Norway and at Roscoff.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , August 1971 , pp. 641 - 652
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blegvad, H. 1922. On the biology of some Danish gammarids and mysids. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Vol. 28, pp. 1–103.Google Scholar
Holmquist, C. 1957. On aberrant specimens of Praunus flexuosus and some other oppossum shrimps. Acta boreal., No. 13, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Holt, E. W. L. & Beaumont, W. I. 1900. Survey of fishing grounds, west coast of Ireland, 1890–1891. X. Report on the Crustacea Schizopoda of Ireland. Sci. Trans. R. Dubl. Soc., Ser. 11, Vol. 7, pp. 221–252.Google Scholar
Mauchline, J. 1965. Breeding and fecundity of Praunus inermis [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 663–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. 1970. The biology of Schistomysis ornata [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 50, pp. 169–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. 1971. The biology of Neomysis integer [Crustacea, Mysidacea]. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 51. pp. 347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. M. 1892. On British Mysidae, a family of Crustacea Schizopoda. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 6, Vol. 10, pp. 242–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nouvel, H. 1964. Régénérations héteacute;romorphiques de l'ecaille antennaire chez les Mysidacés. Vie Milieu, Suppl. 17, pp. 337–44.Google Scholar
Nouvel, H. & Nouvel, L. 1939. Observations sur la biologie d'une Mysis: Praunus flexuosus (Müller, 1788). Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, No. 761, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M. & Tattersall, O. S. 1951. The British Mysidacea. 460 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar