Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T18:10:44.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The distribution and environmental requirements of large brown seaweeds in the British Isles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Chris Yesson*
Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Now at Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK
Laura E. Bush
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK
Andrew J. Davies
School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Menai Bridge, Anglesey LL59 5AB, UK
Christine A. Maggs
School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK
Juliet Brodie
Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Correspondence should be addressed to: C. Yesson, Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK email:


Kelps, fucoids and other large brown seaweeds are common and important features of temperate coastal zones. The British Isles is a centre for seaweed diversity in the NE Atlantic, but, despite numerous surveys, an incomplete picture of the distribution remains. Survey data and herbarium specimens were used to examine the environmental preference of 15 species of large brown seaweeds, covering the orders Laminariales (kelps), Fucales (wracks) and one species of Tilopteridales. Habitat suitability models were developed to estimate broad-scale distribution and area of habitat created by these species around the British Isles. Topographic parameters were important factors limiting distributions. Generally, temperature did not appear to be a limiting factor, probably because the British Isles lies in the centre of the NE Atlantic distribution for most species, and not at climatic tolerance limits. However, for the recent migrant Laminaria ochroleuca, temperature was found to be important for the model, thus range expansion could continue northwards provided dispersal is possible. In contrast, the widespread Alaria esculenta showed a negative association with warmer summer temperatures. The total potential habitat around the British and Irish coastline is more than 19,000 km2 for kelps and 11,000 km2 for wracks, which represents a significant habitat area similar in scale to British broadleaf forest. We conclude that large brown algal species need to be managed and conserved in a manner that reflects their scale and importance.

Research Article
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Adey, W.H. and Steneck, R.S. (2001) Thermogeography over time creates biogeographic regions: a temperature/space/time-integrated model and an abundance-weighted test for benthic marine algae. Journal of Phycology 37, 677698.Google Scholar
Araújo, M.B. and Guisan, A. (2006) Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography 33, 16771688.Google Scholar
Atkinson, S. and Townsend, M. (2011) The state of the UK's forests, woods and trees: perspectives from the sector. Grantham: Woodland Trust, 100 pp.Google Scholar
Bartsch, I., Wiencke, C., Bischof, K., Buchholz, C.M., Buck, B.H., Eggert, A., Feuerpfeil, P., Hanelt, D., Jacobsen, S., Karez, R., Karsten, U., Molis, M., Roleda, M.Y., Schubert, H., Schumann, R., Valentin, K., Weinberger, F. and Wiese, J. (2008) The genus Laminaria sensu lato: recent insights and developments. European Journal of Phycology 43, 186.Google Scholar
Bartsch, I., Wiencke, C. and Laepple, T. (2012) Global seaweed biogeography under a changing climate: the prospected effects of temperature. In Wiencke, C. and Bischof, K. (eds) Seaweed biology. Berlin: Springer, pp. 383406.Google Scholar
Bekkby, T., Nilsson, H., Olsgard, F., Rygg, B., Isachsen, P.E. and Isæus, M. (2008) Identifying soft sediments at sea using GIS-modelled predictor variables and Sediment Profile Image (SPI) measured response variables. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 79, 631636.Google Scholar
Birkett, D.A., Maggs, C.A., Dring, M.J. and Boaden, P.J.S. (1998) Infralittoral reef biotopes with kelp species (volume VII). In An overview of dynamic and sensitivity characteristics for conservation management of marine SACs. Oban: Scottish Association of Marine Science (UK Marine SACs Project), 174 pp.Google Scholar
Borum, J., Pedersen, M., Krause-Jensen, D., Christensen, P. and Nielsen, K. (2002) Biomass, photosynthesis and growth of Laminaria saccharina in a high-arctic fjord, NE Greenland. Marine Biology 141, 1119.Google Scholar
Brodie, J., Andersen, R.A., Kawachi, M. and Millar, A.J.K. (2009) Endangered algal species and how to protect them. Phycologia 48, 423438.Google Scholar
Brodie, J., Williamson, C.J., Smale, D.A., Kamenos, N.A., Mieszkowska, N., Santos, R., Cunliffe, M., Steinke, M., Yesson, C., Anderson, K.M., Asnaghi, V., Brownlee, C., Burdett, H.L., Burrows, M., Collins, S., Donohughe, P., Harvey, B., Foggo, A., Noisette, F., Nunes, J., Raggazola, F., Raven, J.A., Schmidt, D.N., Suggett, D., Teichberg, M. and Hall-Spencer, J.M. (2014) The future of the NE Atlantic benthic flora in a high CO2 world. Ecology and Evolution 4, 27872798.Google Scholar
Bunker, F., Brodie, J., Maggs, C. and Bunker, A. (2010) Seasearch guide to seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. Plymouth: Wild Nature Press.Google Scholar
Critchley, A.T., Ohno, M. and Largo, D.B. (2006) World seaweed resources. An authoritative reference system. DVD-ROM, version 1.0. Amsterdam: ETI Bioinformatics.Google Scholar
Downie, A.-L., von Numers, M. and Boström, C. (2013) Influence of model selection on the predicted distribution of the seagrass Zostera marina . Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 121–122, 819.Google Scholar
Eggert, A. (2012) Seaweed responses to temperature. In Wiencke, C. and Bischof, K. (eds) Seaweed Biology. Berlin: Springer, pp. 4766.Google Scholar
Elith, J. and Leathwick, J.R. (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40, 677697.Google Scholar
Elith, J., Phillips, S.J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y.E. and Yates, C.J. (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17, 4357.Google Scholar
Eriksson, B.K., Johansson, G. and Snoeijs, P. (2002) Long-term changes in the macroalgal vegetation of the inner Gullmar Fjord, Swedish Skagerrak coast. Journal of Phycology 38, 284296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, A.H. and Bell, J.F. (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 24, 3849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, D., Bajjouk, T., Populus, J., Vasquez, M. and Ehrhold, A. (2012) Modeling kelp forest distribution and biomass along temperate rocky coastlines. Marine Biology 160, 309325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiry, M.D., Guiry, G.M., Morrison, L., Rindi, F., Miranda, S.V., Mathieson, A.C., Parker, B.C., Langangen, A., John, D.M., Bárbara, I., Carter, C.F., Kuipers, P. and Garbary, D.J. (2014) AlgaeBase: an on-line resource for Algae. Cryptogamie, Algologie 35, 105115.Google Scholar
Harley, C.D.G., Anderson, K.M., Demes, K.W., Jorve, J.P., Kordas, R.L., Coyle, T.A. and Graham, M.H. (2012) Effects of climate change on global seaweed communities. Journal of Phycology 48, 10641078.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J., Moore, P.J., Burrows, M.T., Poloczanska, E., Mieszkowska, N., Herbert, R.J.H., Jenkins, S.R., Thompson, R.C., Genner, M.J. and Southward, A.J. (2008) Complex interactions in a rapidly changing world: responses of rocky shore communities to recent climate change. Climate Research 37, 123133.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S., Sugden, H., Mieszkowska, N., Moore, P., Poloczanska, E., Leaper, R., Herbert, R.J.H., Genner, M.J., Moschella, P.S., Thompson, R.C., Jenkins, S.R., Southward, A.J. and Burrows, M.T. (2009) Consequences of climate-driven biodiversity changes for ecosystem functioning of North European rocky shores. Marine Ecology Progress Series 396, 245259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiberger, R.M. (2011) HH: Statistical analysis and data display: Heiberger and Holland. R package version 2.2–23. Http:// Scholar
Heiberger, R.M. and Holland, B. (2004) Statistical analysis and data display: an intermediate course with examples in S-PLUS, R and SAS. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hernandez, P.A., Graham, C.H., Master, L.L. and Albert, D.L. (2006) The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography, 29, 773785.Google Scholar
Hiscock, K., Southward, A., Tittley, I. and Hawkins, S. (2004) Effects of changing temperature on benthic marine life in Britain and Ireland. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 14, 333362.Google Scholar
Holman, R. and Haller, M.C. (2013) Remote sensing of the nearshore. Annual Review of Marine Science 5, 95113.Google Scholar
Izquierdo, J.L., Pérez-Ruzafa, I.M. and Gallardo, T. (2002) Effect of temperature and photon fluence rate on gametophytes and young sporophytes of Laminaria ochroleuca Pylaie. Helgoland Marine Research 55, 285292.Google Scholar
John, D.M. (1969) An ecological study on Laminaria ochroleuca . Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 49, 175.Google Scholar
Koch, M., Bowes, G., Ross, C. and Zhang, X.-H. (2013) Climate change and ocean acidification effects on seagrasses and marine macroalgae. Global Change Biology 19, 103132.Google Scholar
Kraan, S. (2012) Algal polysaccharides, novel applications and outlook, carbohydrates. In Chang, C.-F. (ed.) Comprehensive studies on glycobiology and glycotechnology. InTech: Google Scholar
Lamela-Silvarrey, C., Fernández, C., Anadón, R. and Arrontes, J. (2012) Fucoid assemblages on the north coast of Spain: past and present (1977–2007). Botanica Marina 55, 199207.Google Scholar
Lima, F.P., Ribeiro, P.A., Queiroz, N., Hawkins, S.J. and Santos, A.M. (2007) Do distributional shifts of northern and southern species of algae match the warming pattern? Global Change Biology 13, 25922604.Google Scholar
Lüning, K. (1990) Seaweeds: their environment, biogeography, and ecophysiology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Mann, K.H. (1973) Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth: the role of large marine algae in coastal productivity is far more important than has been suspected. Science 182, 975981.Google Scholar
Martínez, B., Viejo, R.M., Carreño, F. and Aranda, S.C. (2012) Habitat distribution models for intertidal seaweeds: responses to climatic and non-climatic drivers. Journal of Biogeography 39, 18771890.Google Scholar
McHugh, D. (2003) A guide to the seaweed industry. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Méléder, V., Populus, J., Guillaumont, B., Perrot, T. and Mouquet, P. (2010) Predictive modelling of seabed habitats: case study of subtidal kelp forests on the coast of Brittany, France. Marine Biology 157, 15251541.Google Scholar
Moy, F.E. and Christie, H. (2012) Large-scale shift from sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) to ephemeral algae along the south and west coast of Norway. Marine Biology Research 8, 309321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, R., Laepple, T., Bartsch, I. and Wiencke, C. (2009) Impact of oceanic warming on the distribution of seaweeds in polar and cold-temperate waters. Botanica Marina 52, 617638.Google Scholar
Norton, T. (1978) Mapping species distributions as a tool in marine ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 76, 201213.Google Scholar
Pauly, K. and De Clerck, O. (2010) GIS-based environmental analysis, remote sensing, and niche modeling of seaweed communities. In Seckbach, J., Einav, R. and Israel, A. (eds) Seaweeds and their role in globally changing environments. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 93114.Google Scholar
Pfetzing, J., Stengel, D.B., Cuffe, M.M., Savage, A.V. and Guiry, M.D. (2000) Effects of temperature and prolonged emersion on photosynthesis, carbohydrate content and growth of the brown intertidal aalga Pelvetia canaliculata . Botanica Marina 43, 399407.Google Scholar
Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P. and Schapire, R.E. (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190, 231259.Google Scholar
Raes, N. (2012) Partial versus full species distribution models. Natureza and Conservação 10, 127138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L.M., Elith, J., Hobday, J., Pearson, R.G., Kendall, B.E., Possingham, H.P. and Richardson, A.J. (2011) Pushing the limits in marine species distribution modelling: lessons from the land present challenges and opportunities. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20, 789802.Google Scholar
Schils, T. and Wilson, S.S.C. (2006) Temperature threshold as a biogeographic barrier in northern Indian Ocean macroalgae. Journal of Phycology 42, 749756.Google Scholar
Simkanin, C., Power, A.M., Myers, A., McGrath, D., Southward, A., Mieszkowska, N., Leaper, R. and O'Riordan, R. (2005) Using historical data to detect temporal changes in the abundances of intertidal species on Irish shores. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 13291340.Google Scholar
Sjøtun, K., Fredriksen, S. and Lein, T. (1993) Population studies of Laminaria hyperborea from its northern range of distribution in Norway. Developments in Hydrobiology 85, 215221.Google Scholar
Smale, D.A., Burrows, M.T., Moore, P.J., O'Connor, N. and Hawkins, S.J. (2013) Threats and knowledge gaps for ecosystem services provided by kelp forests: a northeast Atlantic perspective. Ecology and Evolution 11, 40164038.Google Scholar
Smale, D.A. and Wernberg, T. (2013) Extreme climatic event drives range contraction of a habitat-forming species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 280, 20122829.Google Scholar
Steneck, R.S., Graham, M.H., Bourque, B.J., Corbett, D., Erlandson, J.M., Estes, J.A. and Tegner, M.J. (2002) Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environmental Conservation 29, 436459.Google Scholar
Stengel, D., Wilkes, R. and Guiry, M. (1999) Seasonal growth and recruitment of Himanthalia elongata (Fucales, Phaeophycota) in different habitats on the Irish west coast. European Journal of Phycology 34, 213221.Google Scholar
Sundene, O. (1973) Growth and reproduction in Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae). Norwegian Journal of Botany 20, 249255.Google Scholar
tom Dieck, I. (1992) North Pacific and North Atlantic digitate Laminaria species (Phaeophyta): hybridization experiments and temperature responses. Phycologia 31, 147163.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, C.D., Little, C., Dlouhy-Massengale, B., Stirling, P. and Pilling, G.M. (2013) Changes in brown seaweed distributions in Lough Hyne, SW Ireland: a long-term perspective. Botanica Marina 56, 323338.Google Scholar
Tyberghein, L., Verbruggen, H., Pauly, K., Troupin, C., Mineur, F. and De Clerck, O. (2012) Bio-ORACLE: a global environmental dataset for marine species distribution modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21, 272281.Google Scholar
Van den Hoek, C. (1982) The distribution of benthic marine algae in relation to the temperature regulation of their life histories. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 18, 81144.Google Scholar
Verbruggen, H., Tyberghein, L., Belton, G.S., Mineur, F., Jueterbock, A., Hoarau, G., Gurgel, C.F.D. and De Clerk, O. (2013) Improving transferability of introduced species’ distribution models: new tools to forecast the spread of a highly invasive seaweed. PLoS ONE 8, e68337.Google Scholar
Verbruggen, H., Tyberghein, L., Pauly, K., Vlaeminck, C., Nieuwenhuyze, K. Van, Kooistra, W.H.C.F., et al. (2009) Macroecology meets macroevolution: evolutionary niche dynamics in the seaweed Halimeda . Global Ecology and Biogeography 18, 393405.Google Scholar
Wernberg, T., Russell, B.D., Thomsen, M.S., Gurgel, C.F.D., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Poloczanska, E.S. and Connell, S.D. (2011) Seaweed communities in retreat from ocean warming. Current Biology 21, 18281832.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Yesson supplementary material


Download Yesson supplementary material(File)
File 651.8 KB