Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T00:46:11.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Filtering, feeding, and digestion in the lamellibranch Lasaea rubra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Dorothy Ballantine
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
J. E. Morton
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Queen Mary College, University of London

Extract

Lasaea rubra is the smallest and commonest of Plymouth bivalves. It is intertidal on rocky shores, often in immense numbers, in crevices and other protected places, and in Pygmaea pumila (Colman, 1940). This bivalve is an excellent laboratory animal. It remains fully active for several days under laboratory conditions, and a large number of animals can be used in a single experiment, eliminating the variations in activity found when dealing with a few, or single specimens of larger animals. Because of the relatively high position Lasaea rubra may occupy on the shore its feeding cycle is broken by regular dry periods at each tide. Thus, for experiments relating to periodicity in feeding, we have an animal whose times of feeding can easily be ascertained and experimentally varied over a wide range. Lastly, in making serial sections and in examining total gut contents, in work on the digestive system, the small size of the animal is of obvious advantage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, D., 1936. On the ciliary mechanisms and interrelationships of lamellibranchs. Part I. Some new observations on sorting mechanisms. Quart. J. micr. Set., Vol. 79, pp. 181308.Google Scholar
Atkins, D. 1938. On the ciliary mechanisms and interrelationships of lamellibranchs. Part VII. Latero-frontal cilia of the gill filaments and their phylogenetic value. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 80, pp. 345436.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, R., 1953. Studies on the interrelationships of zooplankton and phytoplankton. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 385”447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, W. R., 1947. Nutrition, growth and sexuality of the Pismo Clam (Tivela stultorum). J. exp. Zool, Vol. 104, pp. 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colman, J. S., 1940. On the faunas inhabiting intertidal seaweeds. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 129183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. L. (ed.), 1936. The habitat and food of the California sea mussel. Bull. Scripps Instn Oceanogr. tech., No. 4, pp. 164.Google Scholar
Fox, D. L. & Coe, W. R., 1943. Biology of the California sea mussel (Mytilus californianus). II. Nutrition, metabolism, growth and calcium deposition. J. exp. Zool, Vol. 93, pp. 205249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. L., Sverdrup, H. U. & Cunningham, J. P., 1937. The rate of water propulsion by the California Mussel. Biol. Bull, Woods Hole, Vol. 72, pp. 417438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S., 1928. Experimental study of the function of the oyster gills and its bearing on the problems of oyster culture and sanitary control of the oyster industry. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., Vol. 44, pp. 139.Google Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S., Chipman, W. A., Engle, J. B. & Calderwood, H. N., 1947 Ecological and physiological studies of the effect of sulfate pulp mill wastes on oysters in the York River, Virginia. Fish. Bull., U.S., Vol. 43, No. 51, pp. 59186.Google Scholar
Glynne-Williams, J. & Hobart, J., 1952. Studies on the crevice fauna of a selected shore in Anglesey. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 122, pp. 797824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., 1928. Ciliary Movement. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W., 1948. The estimation of phosphate and total phosphorus in sea-waters. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 337–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendey, N. I., 1954. Notes on the Plymouth ‘Nitzschia’ culture. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 335–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P. B., 1915. Studies concerning the organic matter of the sea bottom. Rep. Danish biol. Sta., Vol. 22 (1914), pp. 139.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B., 1949. The rate of feeding by Mytilus in different kinds of suspension. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 28, pp. 333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B. & Goldberg, E. D., 1953. Particle filtration in some ascidians and lamellibranchs. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 105, pp. 477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L., 1949. On the food selectivity of oysters. Science, Vol. 110, p. 122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loosanoff, V. L. & Engle, J. B., 1947. Effect of different concentrations of micro-organisms on the feeding of oysters (O. virginica). Fish. Bull., U.S., Vol. 42, No. 51, pp. 3157.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. & Nomejko, C. A., 1946. Feeding of oysters in relation to tidal stages and to periods of light and darkness. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 90, pp. 244–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macginitie, G. E., 1941. On the method of feeding of four pelecypods. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole, Vol. 80, pp. 1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. E., 1954. The crevice faunas of the upper intertidal zone at Wembury. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 187224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, B. S., 1953. Cellulolytic activity in the lamellibranch crystalline style. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 491”5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, E., 1955. Observations on the Anatomy and Mode of Life of Lasaea rubra (Montagu) and Turtonia minuta (Fabricius). Proc. malacol. Soc. Lond., Vol. 31, pp. 226–49.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1914. On ciliary mechanisms in brachiopods and some polychaetes, with a comparison of the ciliary mechanisms on the gills of molluscs, Protochordata, brachiopods and cryptocephalous polychaetes, and an account of the endostyle of Crepidula and its allies. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 10, pp. 283311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, J. Dos, S., 1953. Intoxicões alimentares e outros acidentes causãdos par flagelados marinhos. Rev. Med. contemp., Madr., Vol. 71, pp. 103–19.Google Scholar
Popham, M. L., 1940. The mantle cavity of some of the Erycinidae, Montacutidae and Galeommatidae, with special reference to the ciliary mechanisms. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 24, pp. 549–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, C. P., 1954. Studies on the culture of a marine diatom. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 33, pp. 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H. F., 1950. Alcian Blue 8GS: a new stain for mucin. Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 91, pp. 477–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, M., 1939. Bacterial Metabolism. London.Google Scholar
Tammes, P. M. L. & Dral, A. D. G., 1955. Observations on the straining of suspensions by Mytilus. Arch, neerl. Zool., Vol. 11, pp. 87112.Google Scholar
Verwey, J., 1952. On the ecology of distribution of cockle and mussel in the Dutch Waddensea, their role in sedimentation and the source of their food supply, with a short review of the feeding behaviour of bivalve mollusks. Arch, néerl. Zool., Vol. 10, pp. 171239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willemsen, J., 1952. Quantities of water pumped by mussels (Mytilus edulis) and cockles (Cardium edule). Arch, néerl. Zool, Vol. 10, pp. 153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1946. The triradiate and other forms of Nitzschia closterium (Ehrenberg) Wm. Smith forma minutissima of Allen and Nelson. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 26, pp. 235–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1926. Structure and physiology of the organs of feeding and digestion in Ostrea edulis. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 14, pp. 295386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1938. Evolution of ciliary feeding in the Prosobranchia, with an account of the feeding in Capulus ungaricus. J. Mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 22, pp. 453–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1949 On the structure and adaptations of the Tellinacea: deposit-feeding Eulamellibranchia. Phil. Trans., B, Vol. 234, pp. 2976.Google Scholar