Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T04:51:50.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological diagnosis of the two genetic lineages of Acrocnida brachiata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), with description of a new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Sabine Stöhr*
Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden
Delphine Muths
Institut Français de Recherche et d'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER), Délégation de la Réunion, Rue Jean Bertho, BP60, 97822 Le Port cédex
Correspondence should be addressed to: S. Stöhr, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden email:


The burrowing brittle-star Acrocnida brachiata has so far been regarded as a single, easily identifiable species. Recent studies showed habitat-related differences in maximum size, life span, breeding time and recruitment between intertidal and subtidal populations, which at first were attributed to environmental effects on individuals within the same species. Molecular data, however, strongly suggested the existence of two distinct lineages and ultimately two cryptic species with clear bathymetric segregation. Morphological evidence had so far not been presented, because any differences were interpreted as intraspecific variation. We collected A. brachiata from intertidal and subtidal habitats at the coast of Brittany, France, and examined 15 specimens of each group externally by SEM. A key character of A. brachiata is that the scales at the edge of the disc and on the ventral side are conically enlarged. Intertidal individuals showed a sparser disc scalation, more spine-like than conical ventral disc scales and spatulate, distally widened arm spines. In addition, we dissected several specimens of different size and examined the internal skeleton by SEM. The oral plates showed a rib-like structure on their abradial face that differs between individuals from either habitat. Subtidal specimens have fewer ribs than intertidal ones. These consistent differences support the existence of two species within A. brachiata. To describe the second species, we needed to establish the identity of A. brachiata. We describe a neotype, because no type material has been preserved since it was first described; it corresponds mainly to subtidal samples. The new species is described as Acrocnida spatulispina sp. nov. The taxonomic status of Acrocnida has been debated over the years with reference to its close affinities with Amphiura chiajei. We compared the species of Acrocnida with A. chiajei and Amphiura filiformis and found that Acrocnida is indeed morphologically similar to A. chiajei, among other characters by a similar oral plate structure, whereas A. filiformis differs greatly from Acrocnida as well as A. chiajei. Most strikingly, it has a different type of oral plate. These findings indicate that fundamental taxonomic changes may need to be made in the family Amphiuridae in the future.

Research Article
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Bourgoin, A., Guillou, M. and Glémarec, M. (1991) Environmental instability and demographic variability in Acrocnida brachiata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) in Douarnenez Bay (Brittany: France). Marine Ecology 12, 89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A.M. (1970) Notes on the family Amphiuridae (Ophiuroidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology 19, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. (1843) On the radiata of the eastern Mediterranean. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 19.Google Scholar
Geiger, D.L., Marshall, B.A., Ponder, W.F., Sasaki, T. and Warén, A. (2007) Techniques for collecting, handling, preparing, storing and examining small molluscan specimens. Molluscan Research 27, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentil, F. and Zakardjian, B. (1989) Premières données sur la dynamique de population d'Acrocnida brachiata (Montagu) en Baie de Seine orientale. Vie Marine HS 10, 148.Google Scholar
Gislén, T. (1926) On the generic types of the ophiurid genus Ophiocentrus Ljungman (Amphiocnida Verrill). Göteborgs Kungliga Vetenskaps- och Vitterhets-Samhälles Handlingar. Fjärde Följden 30, 116.Google Scholar
Jolly, M.T., Viard, F., Gentil, F., Thiebaut, E. and Jollivet, D. (2006) Comparative phylogeography of two coastal polychaete tubeworms in the North East Atlantic supports shared history and vicariant events. Molecular Ecology 15, 18411855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, B.F. and Mercer, J.P. (1986) An oceanographical survey of Killary Harbour on the West coast of Ireland. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 86, 9199.Google Scholar
Knowlton, N. and Weight, L. (1997) Species of marine invertebrates: a comparison of the biological and phylogenetic species concepts. In Claridge, M.F, Dawah, H.A. and Wilson, M.R. (eds) Species: the units of biodiversity. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 199221.Google Scholar
Koehler, R. (1914) Echinoderma I. Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea et Echinoidea. In Michaelsen, E. (ed.) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas, Volume 1. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen & Co., pp. 127303.Google Scholar
Koehler, R. (1921) Faune de France—Echinodermes. Paris: Le Chevalier.Google Scholar
Koehler, R. (1922) Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea. Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–1914. Scientific Report Series C 8, 598, pls 76–90.Google Scholar
Ljungman, A.V. (1867) Ophiuroidea viventia huc usque cognita. Öfversigt af Kungliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar 1866 23, 303336.Google Scholar
Madsen, F.J. (1970) West African ophiuroids. Atlantidae Report 11, 151243.Google Scholar
Martynov, A.V. (in press) Structure of the arm spine articulation ridges as a basis for taxonomy of Ophiuroidea (a preliminary report). Proceedings of the 12th International Echinoderm Conference, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
Montagu, G. (1804) Description of several marine animals found on the south coast of Devonshire. Transactions of the Linnean Society 7, 6185, pl. VI, VII.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortensen, T. (1936) Echinoidea and Ophiuroidea. Discovery Report 12, 199348.Google Scholar
Moyse, J. and Tyler, P.A. (1995) Sea urchins, starfish, and sea cucumbers (Phylum Echinodermata). In Hayward, P.J. and Ryland, J.S. (eds) Handbook of the marine fauna of north-west Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 662686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, O.F. (1776) Zoologiae Danicae prodromus, seu animalium Daniae et Norvegiae indigenarum: characteres, nomina, et synonyma imprimis popularium. Copenhagen: Havniae.Google Scholar
Murakami, S. (1942) Ophiurans of Izu, Japan. Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Kyusyu Imperial University 7, 136.Google Scholar
Murakami, S. (1963) The dental and oral plates of Ophiuroidea. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand, Zoology 4, 148.Google Scholar
Muths, D., Davoult, D., Gentil, F. and Jollivet, D. (2006) Incomplete cryptic speciation between intertidal and subtidal morphs of Acrocnida brachiata (Echinoderm: Ophiuroidea) in the North East Atlantic. Molecular Ecology 15, 33033318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, M. (1857) Bidrag til kundskaben om Middelhavets Littoral-Fauna. Nyt Magazin för Naturvidenskab 10, 57155.Google Scholar
Stöhr, S. (2005) Who's who among baby brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea): postmetamorphic development of some North Atlantic forms. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 143, 543576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, C.M. and Tyler, P.A. (1985) Post-larval development of the common north-west European brittle stars Ophiura ophiura, O. albida and Acrocnida brachiata (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Marine Biology 89, 281292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar