Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T04:07:31.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An overview of the amphipod genus Haploops (Ampeliscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Jean-Claude Dauvin  and
Denise Bellan-Santini
Jean-Claude Dauvin
Affiliation:
Station Biologique, CNRS-UPR 4601 etUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI), 29680 Roscoff, France
Denise Bellan-Santini
Affiliation:
Station Marine d'Endoume, CNRS-GR ECOPROPHYCE, Rue de la Batterie des Lions, 13007 Marseille, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Available data concerning the taxonomy, biology, ecology and biogeography of the genus Haploops is presented. The genus, represented by 15 valid species, is typically associated with deep and cold waters. Haploops is confined to the Arctic, north Atlantic and north Pacific Oceans with the exception of two Tasmanian species. Phyletic relationships show four principal groups of species, but there is no clear correlation between these groups and their biogeographical distribution. The biology of Haploops is typical of the biology of a cold-water amphipod. The distribution and the biology of Haploops is contrasted with that of Ampelisca, another genus of the family Ampeliscidae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , November 1990 , pp. 887 - 903
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J.A., 1953. Observations on the epifauna of the deep-water muds of the Clyde Sea area, with special reference to Chlamys septemradiata (Müller). Journal of Animal Ecology, 22, 240–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, J.L., 1961. Gammaridean Amphipoda from depths of 400 to 6000 meters. Galathea Report, 5, 23–128.Google Scholar
Barnard, J.L., 1964. Deep-sea Amphipoda (Crustacea) collected by the R/V Vema in the Eastern Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean and Mediterranean Seas. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 127, 3–46.Google Scholar
Barnard, J.L., 1966. Submarine canyons of southern California. Part V. Systematics: Amphipoda. Allan Hancock Pacific Expedition, 27 (5), 166 pp.Google Scholar
Barnard, J.L., 1971. Gammaridean Amphipoda from a deep-sea transect off Oregon. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, no. 61, 86 pp.Google Scholar
Barnard, K.H., 1931. Diagnosis of new genera and species of amphipod Crustacea collected during the ‘Discovery’ investigations, 1925–1927. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 7, 425–430.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D., 1982. Family Ampeliscidae. Mémoires del'Institut Océanographique, Monaco, 13 (1), 19–69.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D., 1983. Distribution des Ampelisca (Crustacea, Amphipoda) de Méditerranée. In Selected Papers on Crustacea (ed. P., Rabindranath), pp. 151–161. India: N. Krishna Pillai Farewell Committee, The Aquarium, Trivandrum.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Dauvin, J.C., 1988a. Eléments de synthèse sur les Ampelisca du nord-est Atlantique. Crustaceana, supplément 13, 20–60.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Dauvin, J.C., 1988b. Actualisation des données sur 1'écologie, la biogéographie et la phylogénie des Ampeliscidae (Crustacés-Amphipodes) Atlantiques après la révision des collections d'E. Chevreux. Actes de Colloques, IFREMER, 8, 207–216.Google Scholar
Bellan-Santini, D. & Dauvin, J.C., 1989. Distribution verticale et répartition biogéographique de Crustacés holobenthiques filtreurs: exemple des Amphipodes du genre Ampelisca, groupe zoologique à forte spéciation. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 5 (3) 561–568Google Scholar
Boeck, A., 1871. Crustacea Amphipoda borealiet arctica. Forhandlinger i Videnskabsselskabet i Kristiania, 1871, 83–280.Google Scholar
Brunel, P., 1970. Catalogue d'invertébrés benthiques du golfe du Saint-Laurent recueillis de 1951 à 1966 par la station de Biologie marine de Grande Riviére. Travaux sur les Pêcheries du Québec, no. 32, 1–55.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.B., 1963. The bottom fauna communities and their sediment relationships off the coast of Northumberland. Oikos, 14, 154–175.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1900. Amphipodes provenant des campagnes de l'Hirondelle (1885–1888). Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Accompliés par Albert I, 16, 195 pp.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1908. Diagnose d'amphipodes nouveaux provenant des Campagnes de la Princesse-Alice dans l'Atlantique nord. Bulletin de I'lnstitut Océanographique, no. 117, 1–13.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1919. Note préliminaire sur les Amphipodes recueillis par les expéditions du ‘Travailleur’ etdu ‘Talisman’ (1880–1883). Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 7, 574–586.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1927. Crustacés Amphipodes. Expéditions Scientifiques du ‘Travaillenr’ et du ‘Talisman’ pendant les Années 1880–83, 9, 42–152.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E., 1935. Amphipodes provenant des campagnes du Prince Albert ler de Monaco. Résultats des Campagnes Scientifiques Accompliés par Albert I, 90, 214 pp.Google Scholar
Chevreux, E. & Fage, L., 1925. Amphipodes. Faune de France, 9, 488 pp.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J.C., 1989. Life cycle, dynamics and productivity of Crustacea-Amphipoda from the Western English Channel. 5. Ampelisca sarsi Chevreux. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 128, 31–56.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J.C. & Bellan-Santini, D., 1988. Illustrated key to Ampelisca species from the north-eastern Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 68, 659–676.Google Scholar
Dauvin, J.C. & Toulemont, A., 1988. Données préliminaries sur les Amphipodes de l'lroise et de ses abords, leurs affinités biogéographiques. Actes de Colloques, IFREMER, 8, 217–222.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.J., 1983. The systematics and distributional ecology of the superfamily Ampeliscidea (Amphipoda: Gammaridea) in the northeastern Pacific region. Publications in Natural Sciences. National Museums of Canada, 1, 37 pp.Google Scholar
Dickinson, J.J., Wigley, R.L., Brodeur, R.D. & Brown-Leger, S., 1980. Distribution of gammaridean Amphipoda (Crustacea) in the middle Atlantic Bight region. Special Scientific Report. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Fisheries), no. 741, 46 pp.Google Scholar
Dunbar, M.J., 1954. The amphipod Crustacea of Ungava Bay, Canadian eastern Arctic. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 11, 709–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enequist, P., 1950. Studies on the soft-bottom amphipods of the Skagerrak. Zoologiska Bidrag Fr(a**)n Uppsala, 28, 297–492.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J., 1986. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package, version 2.9).Google Scholar
Fenwick, G.D. & Steele, D.H., 1983. Amphipods of Placentia Bay Newfoundland. Occasional Papers in Biology. Memorial University of Newfoundland, 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
Glémarec, M., 1969. Les Peuplements Benthiques du Plateau ContinentalNord-Gascogne. Thèse Doctorat d'Etat, Paris.Google Scholar
Glémarec, M, Le Bris, H. & Le Guellec, C, 1986. Modifications des écosystèmes des vases cötières du sud-Bretagne. Hydrobiologia, 142, 159–170.Google Scholar
Gurjanova, E., 1929. Neue Formen arktischer Isopoden und Amphipoden. Zoologische Anzeiger, 81, 309–317.Google Scholar
Gurjanova, E., 1951. Bokoplavy morejSSSR i sopredl'nykh vod (Amphipoda Gammarida). Fauna SSSR, 41, 1029 pp.Google Scholar
Hoek, P.P.C., 1882. Die Crustaceen Gesammelt Wahrent Der Fahrten Des Willem Barents In Den Jahren 1879. Niederländisches Archiv fur Zoologie, supplement 1, 1–175.Google Scholar
Kaïm-Malka, R., 1976. Révision des Haploops (Crustacea, Amphipoda) de Méditerranée. Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 3, 269–308.Google Scholar
Kanneworff, E., 1966. On some amphipod species of the genus Haploops, with special reference to H. tubicola Liljeborg and H. tenuis sp. nov. from the øresund. Ophelia, 3, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liljeborg, H.T., 1855. Om Hafs-Crustaceer vid Kullaberg i Skane. Ofversigt af Kongl. VetenskapsAkademiens Forhandlingar, 12, 117–138.Google Scholar
Lincoln, R.J., 1979. British Marine Amphipoda: Gammaridea. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Lowry, J.K. & Poore, G.C.B., 1985. The Ampeliscid Amphipods Of South-Eastern Australia (Crustacea). Records of the Australian Museum, 36, 259–298.Google Scholar
Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R., 1987. MacClade version 2.1. A phylogenetic computer program distributed by the authors.Google Scholar
Margulis, R.J. 1967. Deep-sea Ampeliscidae (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) from the Pacific Ocean. Crustaceana, 13, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menesguen, A., 1980. La Macrofaune Benthique de la Baie de Concarneau. Thése de 3ème cycle, Université de Brest.Google Scholar
Mills, E.L., 1967. Deep-sea Amphipoda from the western North Atlantic Ocean. Canadian journal of Zoology, 45, 347–355.Google Scholar
Mills, E.L., 1971. Deep-sea Amphipoda from the western North Atlantic Ocean. The family Ampeliscidae. Limnology and Oceanography, 16, 357–386.Google Scholar
Petersen, C.G.J., 1913. Valuation of the sea. II. The animal communities of the sea bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 21, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Petersen, C.G.J., 1918. The sea bottom and its production of fish-food. Report of the Danish Biological Station to the Board of Agriculture, 25, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Préfontaine, G. & Brunel, P., 1962. Liste d'invertébrés marins recueillis dans l'estuaire du Saint-Laurent de 1929 à 1934. Naturaliste Canadian, 89, 237–263.Google Scholar
Sars, G.O., 1891. An Account of the Crustacea of Norway, with Short Descriptions and Figures of all the Species, vol. 1, part 5. Ampeliscidae. Christiania and Copenhagen: Alb Cammermeyers Forlag. Schellenberg, A., 1925. Die Gammariden Spitzbergens nebst einer Uebersicht der von Römer & Schaudinn 1898 im nördlichen Eismeer gesammelten. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 11, 195–231.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, A., 1931. Gammariden und Caprelliden des Magellangebietes, Sudgeorgiens und der Westantarktis. Further Zoological Results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901–1903, 3 (6), 1–290.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, C.R., 1931. The stegocephalid and ampeliscid amphipod crustaceans of Newfound-land, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick in the United National Museum. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 79 (2888), 18 pp.Google Scholar
Sneath, P.H.A. & Sokal, R.R., 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Michener, Cd., 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Kansas University Science Bulletin, 38, 1409–1438.Google Scholar
Stebbing, T.R.R., 1906. Amphipoda. I. Gammaridea. Tierreich, 21, 806 pp.Google Scholar
Stephenson, K., 1925. Crustacea Malacostraca. VI. (Amphipoda II). Danish Ingolf-Expedition, 3 (9), 98–180.Google Scholar
Stephenson, K., 1942. The Amphipoda of north Norway and Spitzbergen with adjacent waters. Tromsø Museums Skrifter, 3 (4), 363–526.Google Scholar
Wildish, D.J., 1984. Secondary production of four sublittoral soft-sediment amphipod populations in the Bay of Fundy. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 62, 1027–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildish, D.J. & Dickinson, J.J., 1982. A new species of Haploops (Amphipoda, Ampeliscidae) from the Bay of Fundy. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 60, 962–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar