Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:21:40.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crab predation on scallop (Pecten maximus) and its implication for scallop cultivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

N. C. H. Lake ,
M. B. Jones  and
J. D. Paul
N. C. H. Lake
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Plymouth Polytechnic, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA
M. B. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Plymouth Polytechnic, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA
J. D. Paul
Affiliation:
Sea Fish Industry Authority, Marine Farming Unit, Ardtoe, Acharacle, Argyll PH36 4LD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The feeding successes of four species of crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura) which are potential predators of the scallop Pecten maximus (L.) were studied under laboratory conditions. When provided with scallops of 4 and 5 cm shell height, Liocarcinus depurator (L.) did not consume any scallops whereas Liocarcinus puber (L.), Carcinus maenas (L.) and Cancer pagurus L. ate both size groupings but with varying success. The differences in the number of scallops eaten paralleled crab size such that C. pagurus, the species with the largest individuals (ca. 10.4 cm carapace width), ate the most, and small crabs (< 5.5 cm carapace width), irrespective of species, ate none or very few scallops. Further experiments with C. pagurus and a wider size range of scallops (3–9 cm shell height) revealed the following trends: as prey size increased, the proportion of crabs feeding decreased and there was minimal predation on scallops > 7 cm shell height; male and female crabs showed similar predatory behaviour; and marine fouling on scallop shells had no significant effect on crab feeding (X2 test, P > 0.05). These findings are discussed in relation to the potential for bottom culture of P. maximus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , February 1987 , pp. 55 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boulding, E. G. & Hay, T. K., 1984. Crab response to prey density can result in density-dependent mortality of clams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41, 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dare, P. J., 1980. Mussel cultivation in England and Wales. Laboratory Leaflets. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Lowestoft, no. 50, 18 pp.Google Scholar
Dare, P. J., Davies, G. & Edwards, D. B., 1983. Predation on juvenile Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas Thunberg) and mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) by shore crabs (Carcinus maenas (L.)). Fisheries Research Technical Report, Lowestoft, no. 73, 15pp.Google Scholar
Davies, G., Dare, P. J. & Edwards, D. B., 1980. Fenced enclosures for the protection of seed mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) from predation by shore-crabs (Carcinus maenas (L.)). Fisheries Research Technical Report, Lowestoft, no. 56, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Ebling, F. J., Kitching, J. A., Muntz, L. & Taylor, C. M., 1964. The ecology of Lough Ine. XIII. Experimental observations of the destruction of Mytilus edulis and Nucella lapillus by crabs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 33, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elner, R. W., 1978. The mechanics of predation by the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (L.), on the edible mussel, Mytilus edulis L. Oecologia, 36, 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elner, R. W. & Hughes, R. N., 1978. Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elner, R. W. & Jamieson, G. S. 1979. Predation of sea scallops, Placopecten magellanicus, by the rock crab, Cancer irroratus, and the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 36, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, G. S., Stone, H. & Etter, M., 1982. Predation of sea scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) by lobsters (Homarus americanus) and rock crabs (Cancer irroratus) in underwater cage enclosures. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39, 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, N. C. H., 1985. Predation of the Scallop Pecten maximus (L.)by Crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura). M.Sc. Thesis, Plymouth Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Minchin, J. D. De C. E., 1984. Aspects of the Biology of Young Escallops Pecten maximus (Linnaeus) (Pectenidae: Bivalvia) About the Irish Coast. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Dublin.Google Scholar
Ventilla, R. F., 1980. The scallop industry in Japan. Advances in Marine Biology, 20, 310–381.Google Scholar
Walne, P. R., 1976. Studies at Conwy on predation by the shore crab. Internal Report. Fisheries Experiment Station, Conwy, Gwynedd, 1976, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Walne, P. R. & Dean, G. J., 1972. Experiments on predation by the shore crab, Carcinus maenas L., on Mytilus and Mercenaria. Journal du Conseil, 34, 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, T. & Paul, J. D., 1983. The potential for scallop culture in the U.K. Technical Report. Sea Fish Industry Authority, no. 224, 23 pp.Google Scholar