Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-20T22:25:43.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations during embryonic development in the genus Doto (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Annetrudi Kress
Annetrudi Kress
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, University of Basle, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While working on taxonomic problems in the family Dotoidae and comparing the Mediterranean and Atlantic species (Schmekel & Kress, in the Press), it became apparent that very little embryological information was available for this group, other than that published by Alder & Hancock (1845–55), Pelseneer (1911), Miller (1958, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool) and Thompson (1967).

In the course of studies on the changes in egg-capsule volume in different nudibranch species (Kress, 1971, 1972) a fresh attempt has been made to obtain some comparative data on egg and capsule sizes and on the course and rate of embryonic development in the three species of Doto most commonly found in the Plymouth area, namely D. coronata (Gmelin, 1791), D. pinnatifida (Montagu, 1804) and D. fragilis (Forbes, 1838).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , August 1975 , pp. 691 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alder, J. & Hancock, A., 1845–1855. A monograph of the British Nudibranchiate Mollusca. 438 pp. London: Ray Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, M. G., 1963. The biology of nudibranch larvae. Oikos, 14, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerman, L., 1970. The influence of low salinity on survival and spawning of Elysia viridis (Montagu) (Opisthobranchia, Sacoglossa). Sarsia, 42, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, A., 1971. Ueber die Entwicklung der Eikapselvolumina bei verschiedenen Opisthobranchier-Arten (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 22, 326–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, A., 1972. Veränderungen Der Eikapselvolumina Wahrend Der Entwicklung Verschiedener Opisthobranchier-Arten (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Marine Biology, 16, 236–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, M., 1925. Nudibranchfaunaen. I, Drøbaksundet. II, Holo- og Cladohepatica. Skrifter utgitt av det Norske videnskaps-akademi i Oslo. I. Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse, no. 2, 5–60.Google Scholar
Løyning, P., 1927. Nudibranchs from Bergen, collected in the neighbourhood of the Biological. Station at Herdla. Nytt magasin for naturvidenskapene, 65, 243–64.Google Scholar
Miller, M., 1958. Studies on the Nudibranchiate Mollusca of the Isle of Man. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1911. Recherches sur l'embryologie des Gastropodes. Mémoires de l'cadémie royale de Belgique, 3, 1–167.Google Scholar
Schmekel, L. & Kress, A. Die Gattung Doto (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) im Mittelmeer und im Aermelkanal mit Beschreibung einer neuen Art, Doto acuta n. sp. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1958. The natural history, embryology, larval biology and post-larval development of Adalaria proxima (Alder and Hancock) (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 242, 1–58.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1961. The importance of the larval shell in the classification of the Sacoglossa and the Acoela (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 34, 233–8.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1967. Direct development in a nudibranch, Cadlina laevis, with a discussion of developmental processes in Opisthobranchia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 47, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar