Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:34:26.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship of larval shell morphology to mode of development in marine prosobranch gastropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Gail M. Lima  and
Richard A. Lutz
Gail M. Lima
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, USA
Richard A. Lutz
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The larval shell of molluscs contains a preserved record of the organism's growth and developmental history. Many investigators have utilized the information recorded in the larval shell morphology to infer mode of development.

Marine prosobranch gastropods were collected from intertidal sites from Maine to Florida and were cultured in the laboratory. Scanning electron microscopy was used to document the relationship of larval shell morphology to development. Four species with planktotrophic larvae, Crepidula fornicata, Crepidula plana, Cerithium atratum and Ilyanassa obsoleta, and four species with non-planktotrophic development, Crepidula convexa, Littorina obtusata, Busycon canaliculatum and Urosalpinx cinerea, were successfully reared through metamorphosis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , August 1990 , pp. 611 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouchet, P. & Warén, A., 1979. Planktotrophic larval development in deep-water gastropods. Sarsia, 64, 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carriker, M.R., 1979. Ultrastructural effect of cleaning molluscan shells with sodium hypochlorite (clorox). Nautilus, 93, 47–50.Google Scholar
Costello, D.P. & Henley, C., 1971. Methods for Obtaining and Handling Marine Eggs and Embryos. Woods Hole: Marine Biological Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobberteen, R.A. & Ellmore, G.S., 1986. Embryonic expression of shell dimorphism in Margarites vorticifera (Gastropoda: Trochidae). Malacological Review, 19, 45–52.Google Scholar
Foighil, D.Ó., 1986. Prodissoconch morphology is environmentally modified in the brooding bivalve, Lasaea subviridis. Marine Biology, 92, 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretter, V. & Pilkington, M.C., 1971. The larval shell of some prosobranch gastropods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, T.A., 1982. Modes of larval development in early tertiary gastropods. Paleobiology, 8, 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoagland, K.E., 1986. Patterns of encapsulation and brooding in the Calyptraeidae (Prosobranchia: Mesogastropoda). Bulletin. American Malacological Union, 4, 173–183.Google Scholar
Houbrick, R.S., 1974. Studies on the reproductive biology of the genus Cerithium (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) in the western Atlantic. Bulletin of Marine Science, 23, 875–904.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., 1982. Evolutionary rates and modes in late Cretaceous gastropods: role of larval ecology. Proceedings of the Third North American Paleontological Convention, 1, 257–262.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., 1986. Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bulletin of Marine Science, 39, 565–587.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. & Lutz, R.A., 1980. Molluscan larval shell morphology: ecological and paleontological applications. In Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms (ed. D.C., Rhoads and R.A., Lutz), pp. 323–377. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D. & Lutz, R.A., 1983. Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: paleobiological implications. Biological Reviews, 58, 21–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, P., 1975. Quaternary larval gastropods from leg 15, site 147, deep sea drilling project. Preliminary report. Veliger, 18, 109–126.Google Scholar
Kesteven, H. L., 1912. The constitution of the gastropod protoconch: its value as a taxonomic feature and the significance of some of its forms. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 37, 49–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labarbera, M., 1974. Larval and post-larval development of five species of Miocene bivalves. Journal of Paleontology, 48, 256–277.Google Scholar
Laursen, D., 1981. Taxonomy and distribution of teleplanic prosobranch larvae in the North Atlantic. Dana Reports, no. 89, 43 pp.Google Scholar
Lima, G.M., 1987. Larval Development of Marine Prosobranch Gastropods: Ecological and Paleontological Implications. PhD Thesis, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Lima, G.M. & Pechenik, J.A., 1985. The influence of temperature on growth rate and length of larval life of the gastropod, Crepidula plana Say. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 90, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, R.A., Bouchet, P., Jablonski, D., Turner, R.D. & Waren, A., 1986. Larval ecology of mollusks at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Bulletin. American Malacological Union, 4, 49–54.Google Scholar
Ockelmann, K.W., 1965. Developmental types in marine bivalves and their distribution along the Atlantic coast of Europe. In Proceedings of the First European Malacological Congress (ed. L.R., Cox and J.F., Peake), pp. 25–35. London: Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and the Malacological Society of London.Google Scholar
Pawlik, J.R., O'sullivan, J.B., & Harasewych, M.G., 1988. The egg capsules, embryos, and larvae of Cancellaria cooperi (Gastropoda: Cancellariidae). Nautilus, 102, 47–53.Google Scholar
Pechenik, J.A., 1980. Growth and energy balance during the larval lives of three prosobranch gastropods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 44, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechenik, J.A., 1986. Field evidence for delayed metamorphosis of larval gastropods: Crepidula plana Say, C. fornicata (L.), and Bittium alternatum (Say). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 97, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechenik, J.A. & Heyman, W.D., 1987. Using KC1 to determine size at competence for larvae of the marine gastropod Crepidula fornicata (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 112, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, F.E., 1981a. Larval biology of six species of the genus Conus (Gastropoda: Toxoglossa) in Hawaii, USA. Marine Biology, 61, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, F.E., 1981b. Larval growth and metamorphosis of Conus (Gastropoda: Toxoglossa) in Hawaii. Pacific Science, 35, 25–38.Google Scholar
Robertson, R., 1971. Scanning electron microscopy of planktonic larval marine gastropod shells. Veliger, 14, 1–12.Google Scholar
Robertson, R., 1976. Marine prosobranch gastropods: larval studies and systematics. Thalassia Jugoslavica, 10, 213–238.Google Scholar
Robertson, R., 1985. Archaeogastropod biology and the systematics of the genus Tricolia (Trochacea: Tricoliidae) in the Indo-West-Pacific. Monographs of Marine Mollusca, no. 3, 103 pp.Google Scholar
Scheltema, R.S., 1967. The relationship of temperature to the larval development of Nassarius obsoletus. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 132, 256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R.S., 1971. Larval dispersal as a means of genetic exchange between geographically separated populations of shallow-water benthic marine gastropods. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 140, 284–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R.S., 1978. On the relationship between dispersal of pelagic larvae and the evolution of marine prosobranch gastropods. In Marine Organisms: Genetics, Ecology and Evolution (ed. B., Battaglia and J.A., Beardmore), pp. 303–322. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Shuto, T., 1974. Larval ecology of prosobranch gastropods and its bearing on biogeography and paleontology. Lethaia, 7, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B., 1945. Observations on gastropod protoconchs. Paleontographica Americana, 3, 221–268.Google Scholar
Thiriot-Quiévreux, C., 1972. Microstructures de coquilles larvaires de prosobranches au micro-scope electronique a balayge. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, 113, 553–564.Google Scholar
Thiriot-Quiévreux, C., 1980. Identification of some planktonic prosobranch larvae present off Beaufort, North Carolina. Veliger, 23, 1–9.Google Scholar
Thiriot-Quiévreux, C. & Scheltema, R.S., 1982. Planktonic larvae of New England gastropods, V. Bittium alternation, Triphora nigrocincta, Cerithiopsis emersoni, Lunatia hems and Crepidula plana. Malacologia, 23, 37–46.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biological Reviews, 25, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, R.D., Lutz, R.A. & Jablonski, D., 1985. Modes of molluscan larval development at deepsea hydrothermal vents. Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington, 6, 167–184.Google Scholar
Valentine, J.W. & Jablonski, D., 1983. Larval adaptations and patterns of brachiopod diversity in space and time. Evolution, 37, 1052–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed