Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:20:39.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproductive Cycleso Of the Razor Clam Ensis Siliqua and the Clam Venus Striatula off Vilamoura, Southern Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M.B. Gaspar
Affiliation:
Instiruto de Investigaçāo das Pescas e do Mar, Centro Regional de Investigação Pesqueira do Sul, Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700 Olhāo, Portugal
C.C. Monteiro
Affiliation:
Instiruto de Investigaçāo das Pescas e do Mar, Centro Regional de Investigação Pesqueira do Sul, Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700 Olhāo, Portugal

Extract

Annual reproductive cycles of two commercially important bivalves, the razor clam Ensis siliqua and the clam Venus striatula were investigated. Specimens of both species were sampled monthly from a site off Vilamoura, south of Portugal, between June 1992 and May 1993. Gonadal development was monitored using standard histological methods. Observed gametogenic progression was categorized by six stages: (0) inactive; (I) early active gametogenesis; (II) late active gametogenesis; (HI) ripe; (IV) partially spawned; and (V) spent. Both males and females showed a synchronism in gonadal development. The gametogenesis in the razor clam began in December and by late April the gonads were characterized morphologically by an abundance of ripe eggs and sperm. Partially spawned individuals were first encountered in May. All were spent by July. The gametogenic activity in V. striatula began in the months of October/November and continued until March. Spawning occurred between April and early August. Both species reached maturity during the first year of life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, A.D., 1961. Reproduction, growth and mortality of Venus striatula (da Costa) in Kames Bay, Millport. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 191215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodoy, A., 1983. Croissance et variations saisonnières de la composition biochimique de Venus gallina dans le Golfe de Marseille (Méditerranée occidentale). Tethys, 11, 5766.Google Scholar
Cano, F.V. & Hernandez, J.M., 1987. Biometria y reproductión de Chamelea gallina, L. en la Bahia de Mazarrón (SE de la Península Ibérica) y algunas consideraciones sobre su pesca. FAO Fisheries Report, 395, 107111.Google Scholar
Froglia, C., 1975. Osservazioni sull'accrescimento di Chamelea gallina L. ed Ensis minor (Chenu) nel Médio Adriático. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Tecnologia della Pesca, 2, 3748.Google Scholar
Guerin, J.P., 1973. Contribution a l'étude systematique, biologique et écologique des larves méroplanctoniques de polychetes et de mollusques de Golfe de Marseille. Tethys, 5, 5570.Google Scholar
Guillou, J. & Sauriau, P.G., 1985. Some observations on the biology and the ecology of a Venus striatula population in the Bay of Douarnenez, Brittany. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 889900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M.V., 1938. Notes on the breeding of some lamellibranchs from Plymouth and their larvae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 23, 119145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marano, G., Casavola, N., Saracino, C. & Rizzi, E., 1982. Riproduzione e crescita di Chamelea gallina (L.) e Venus verrucosa (L.) (Bivalvia: Veneridae) nel Basso Adriatico. Memorie di Biologia Marina e di Oceanografia, 12, 93110.Google Scholar
Mars, P., 1965. Faune marine Pyrénées orientales. 5. Mollusques aplacophores, polyplacophores, scaphopodes et bivalves. Vie et Milieu, 15, supplement, 1156.Google Scholar
Monteiro, C.C. & Gaspar, M.B., 1993. Bivalves do litoral oceânico algarvio: breve notícia sobre a situaçāo actual dos principais bancos (Julho 1993). Relatório Técnico Científico INIP, Lisboa, 65, 119.Google Scholar
Royo, A., 1984. La chirla, Venus gallina L., en el litoral onubense. Actas do IV Simpósio Ibérico de Estudio de Benthos Marinhos, 2, 4966.Google Scholar
Tebble, N., 1966. British bivalve seashells. A handbook for identification, 2nd ed. Edinburgh HMSO: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Valli, G., Mansotti, L., Ceresi, R. & Nodari, P., 1985. Considerazioni sul ciclo riproduttivo e sulla biometria di Ensis minor (Chenu) (Mollusca, Bivalvia) del Golfo de Trieste (Alto Adriatico) dopo un triennio di studio. Nova Thalassia, 7, 538.Google Scholar
Valli, G. & Zecchini-Pinesich, G., 1981. Considerazioni sulla biometria e la reproduzione di Chamelea gallina (L) (Mollusca, Bivalvia) del Golfo de Trieste (Alto Adriático). Nova Thalassia, 5, 5773.Google Scholar
Vizuete, F., Martinez Bano, P. & Mas, J., 1991. Estudio del ciclo reproductive de Chamelea gallina L., en la Bahía de Mazarrón, (S.E. de la Península Ibérica). Actas do VII Simpósio Ibérico de Bentos Marino, Murcia, Outubro, 1991.Google Scholar
Walne, P. & Mann, R., 1975. Growth and biochemical composition in Ostrea edulis and Cassostrea gigas. In Proceedings of the 9th European Marine Biology Symposium, Oban, Scotland, 1974 (ed. H., Barnes), pp. 587607. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar