Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T03:44:27.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the family Ammodytidae (Perciformes) in the Mediterranean with the first record of Gymnammodytes semisquamatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. Sabatés ,
M. Demestre  and
P. Sanchez
A. Sabatés
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciéncias del Mar, Paseo Nacional s/n, 08039 Barcelona, Spain
M. Demestre
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciéncias del Mar, Paseo Nacional s/n, 08039 Barcelona, Spain
P. Sanchez
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciéncias del Mar, Paseo Nacional s/n, 08039 Barcelona, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of the morphological and meristic characters of larval and adult sandeels (Gymnammodytes spp.) collected off the Catalan coast (NW Mediterranean) has revealed the co-occurrence of G. cicerelus and G. semisquamatus in the Mediterranean. The geo-graphical distribution of G. semisquamatus had hitherto been thought to be limited to the European Atlantic coasts. The comparative analysis of specimens of G. semisquamatus from the Mediterranean and from the North Atlantic has demonstrated a marked latitudinal cline in the meristic counts. An exhaustive overview is presented of the bibliography referring to the Ammodytidae family in the Mediterranean, and the validity of the numerous references is discussed. Finally, it has been shown that the accepted description of G. cicerelus included the two species: G. cicerelus and G. semisquamatus. In the present paper an up-to-date diagnosis of both species is presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , August 1990 , pp. 493 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnard, K. H., 1927. Diagnoses of new genera and species of South African marine fishes. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 20, 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bas, C., 1964. Aspectos del crecimiento relativo en peces del Mediterráneo occidental. Investigatión Pesquera, 27, 13–120.Google Scholar
Bini, G., 1968. Atlante dei Pesci delle Coste Italiane, vol. 6. Perciformi. Milano: Mondo Sommerso.Google Scholar
Borja, J., 1820. Contribution al estudio de la fauna ictiológica de España. Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias y Artes de Barcelona (3 época), 16(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
Buen, F. de, 1935. Fauna ictiológica. Catálogo de los peces ibéricos: de la planicie continental, aguas dulces, pelégicos y de los abismos próximos. Primera parte. Notas y Resúmenes. Instituto Español de Oceanografía (serie II), 89, 1–89.Google Scholar
Cameron, J., 1959. The larval and post-larval stages of Gymnammodytes semisquamatus (Jourdain). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 38, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canestrini, G., 1872. Pesci marini, part 2. Milano: Cornelia. [Fauna d'ltalia, vol. 3.]Google Scholar
Carus, V. J., 1893. Vertebrata, 1 Class. Pisces. In Prodromus Faunae Mediterraneae, vol. 2, pp. 581–582. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Cisternas, R., 1875. Descriptión del Ammodytes terebrans, nueva especie del Mediterraneo. Anales de la Sociedad Espanola de Historia Natural, 9, 163–168.Google Scholar
Corbin, P.G., 1950. The occurrence of the smooth sand-eel, Gymnammodytes semisquamatus (Jourdain), in the Plymouth area, with notes on G. cicerelus (Rafinesque), and G. capensis (Barnard). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 29, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, G., 1829–53. Fauna del Regno di Napoli, Ossia Enumerazione di Tutti gli Animali, Pesci, part 1. Napoli.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaroche, M., 1809. Observations sur des poissons racuellis dans un voyage aux Illes Baléars et Pythiuses. Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 13, 98–122.Google Scholar
Duncker, G. & Mohr, E.W., 1935. Die nordeuroppischen Ammodytes - Arten des Hamburger Zoologischen Museums. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 110, 16–220.Google Scholar
Duncker, G. & Mohr, E. W., 1939. Revision der Ammodytidae. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 24, 8–31.Google Scholar
Fage, L., 1918. Shore-fishes. Report on the Danish Oceanographical Expeditions 1908–10 to the Mediterranean, 2(4) (A3), 154 pp.Google Scholar
Gibert, A.M., 1912. Fauna ictiológica de Cataluña. Catalech rahonat dels pexos observats en el litoral y en les aygues dolces catalanes. Butlletí Institució Catalana d'Historia Natural (2 epoca), 8, 138–157.Google Scholar
Günther, A., 1862. Catalogue of the Fishes in the British Museum, vol. 4. Catalogue of the Acanthopterygii Pharyngognathi and Acanthini in the Collection of the British Museum. London.Google Scholar
Jourdain, S., 1879. Sur les Ammodytes des côtes de la Manche. Revue des Sciences Naturelles, Paris, 8(1), 203–210.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema Naturae, Editio X, 1. [Reprint, 1894.]Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, S., 1909. Notizie biologiche riguardanti spedalmente il periodo di maturità sessuale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitteilungen aus der Zoologischen Station zu Neapel, 19, 513–761.Google Scholar
Lozano, Rey L., 1960. Ictiología Ibérica. Peces fisoclistos. Tercera parte, subserie Toracicos (Ordenes Equeneiformes y Gobiformes), Pediculados y Asimetricos. Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas, Naturales, Madrid (ser. Ciencias Naturales), 14, 613 pp.Google Scholar
Macer, C.T., 1967. Ammodytidae. Fiches d'Identification des Oeufs et Larves de Poissons, no. 2, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Moreau, E., 1881. Histoire Naturelle des Poissons de la France, vol. 3. Paris.Google Scholar
Moreau, E., 1891. Histoire Naturelle des Poissons de la France, supplément. Paris.Google Scholar
Rafinesque-Schmalt, C.S., 1810. Caratteri di Alcuni Nuovi Generi e Nuove Sped di Animali (Principalmente di Pesci) e Piante della Sicilia, con Varie Osservazioni Sopra i Medisimi. Palermo.Google Scholar
Reay, P.J., 1970. Synopsis of biological data on North Atlantic sand eels of the genus Ammodytes (A. tobianus, A. dubius, A. americanus, A. marinus). FAO Fisheries Synopsis, no. 82, 53 pp.Google Scholar
Reay, P. J., 1986. Ammodytidae. In Fishes of the North-eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean, vol. 2 (ed. P.J.P., Whiteheadet al.), pp. 945–950. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Richards, S.W., Perlmutter, A. & McAneny, D.C., 1963. A taxonomic study of the genus Ammodytes from the east coast of North America (Teleostei: Ammodytes). Copeia, 1963, 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risso, A., 1810. Ichthyologie de Nice ou Histoire Naturelle des Poissons du Departement des Alpes Maritimes. Paris. [Reprint 1966, Asher & Co., Amsterdam.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risso, A., 1826. Histoire Naturelle des Principales Productions de l'Europe Maridionale et Particulièrement de celles des Environs de Nice et des Alpes Maritimes, vol. 3. Paris et Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Ruivo, M. & Monteiro, R., 1954. Contributions a l'étude de la famille des Ammodytidae. I. Gymnammodytes cicerellus (Raf.) de la région de Banyuls. Vie et Milieu, 5, 569–592.Google Scholar
Sabatés, A., 1988. Sistemática y Distributión Espacio-temporal del Ictioplancton en la Costa Catalana. PhD Thesis, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Comendador, A., 1904. Catalech dels peixos observats en el litoral de Barcelona. Butlletí Institució Catalana d'Historia Natural (2 época), 3–4, 25–32.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P. & Demestre, M., 1988. Note preliminaire concernant la pêche de Gymnammodytes cicerelus en Catalogne (NE de l'Espagne). Rapports et Procès-verbaux des Réunions. Commission Internationale pour l'Exploration Scientifiaue de la Mer Méditerranée, 31(2), 279.Google Scholar
Scott, J.S., 1972. Morphological and meristic variation in northwest Atlantic sand lance (Ammodytes). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 29, 1673–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söljan, T., 1975. I Pesci dell’ Adriatico. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori.Google Scholar
Steindachner, F., 1868. Ichthyologischer Bericht über eine nach Spanien und Portugal unternommene Reise. 6. Forts (Ubersicht der Meeresfische an den Küsten Spanien's und Portugal). Sitzungsberichte der Akademie (I. Abth. April-Heft. Jahrg), 57, 1–73.Google Scholar
Swainson, W., 1820–21. Zoological Illustrations or Original Figures and Descriptions of New, Rare, or Interesting Animals, vol. 1. London: R. & A. Taylor.Google Scholar
Tortonese, E., 1975. Osteichthyes (pesci ossei), part 2. Bologna: Calderini. [Fauna d'ltalia, vol. 11.]Google Scholar
Tortonese, E., 1979. Pesci del Mediterraneo. Recenti studi intorno alia sistematica e distribuzione. Quaderni dell’ Istituto di Idrobiologia e Aquacoltura ‘G. Brunelli’, 745/86. Roma: II Ventaglio.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A., 1969. The Fishes of the British Isles and North-West Europe. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A., 1973. Ammodytidae. In Check-list of the Fishes of the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean, vol. 2 (ed. J.C., Hureau and T.H., Monod), pp. 446–448. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Winters, G.H. & Dalley, E.L., 1988. Meristic composition of sand lance (Ammodytes spp.) in Newfoundland waters with a review of species designations in the Northwest Atlantic. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45, 516–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar