Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:45:54.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sexual Maturity, Fecundity and Growth of the Turbot Scophthalmus Maximus L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. Jones
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft

Extract

The turbot Scophthalmus maximus L. is a large teleost flatfish of the family Bothidae. Its range extends from the Adriatic (Faber, 1883) and Mediterranean (Morgan, 1956) northwards to the Norwegian coast, and includes the Baltic Sea and waters surrounding the British Isles. It has been recorded as far north as the Lofoten Islands (Fulton, 1905), and is taken occasionally at Faroe, Iceland and Rockall.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bagenal, T. B., 1957. The breeding and fecundity of the long rough dab Hippoglossoides platessoides (Fabr.) and the associated cycle in condition. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 339–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B. 1963. The fecundity of witches in the Firth of Clyde. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 43, 401–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, J. N., 1960. Reproduction in female bony fishes. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 1, 105–35.Google Scholar
Bedford, B. C, 1964. Two mechanical aids for otolith reading. Research Bulletin. International Commission for The Northwest Atlantic Fisheries, 1, 7981.Google Scholar
Beverton, R. J. H. & Holt, S. J., 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Investigations, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Ser. 2, 19, 1533.Google Scholar
Bowers, A. B., 1960. Growth of the witch (Glyptocephalus cynoglossus (L.)) in the Irish Sea. Journal du Conseil, 25, 168–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, A. B. & Holliday, F. G. T., 1961. Histological changes in the gonad associated with the reproductive cycle of the herring (Clupea harengus L.). Marine Research, 5, 116.Google Scholar
Brook, G., 1886. The spawning period of the British food-fishes. Fourth Annual Report of the Fishery Board of Scotland for the year 1885, pp. 242–54.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. M., 1964. Burning of otoliths, a technique for age determination of soles and other fish. Journal du Conseil, 29, 7381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewart, J. C. & Fulton, T. W., 1889. Report on the spawning of the British marine food-fishes. Seventh Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland for the year 1888, 3, 186221.Google Scholar
Faber, G. L., 1883. The Fisheries of the Adriatic and the fish thereof, p. 83. London: Bernard Quaritch.Google Scholar
Fleming, A. M., 1960. Age, growth and sexual maturity of cod (Gadus morhua L.) in the Newfoundland area, 1947–1950. Journal of The Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 17, 775809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, T. W., 1891. The comparative fecundity of sea-fishes. Ninth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland for the year 1890, 3, 243–68.Google Scholar
Fulton, T. W., 1892. Observations on the reproduction, maturity, and sexual relations of the food fishes. Tenth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland for the year 1891, 3, 232–43.Google Scholar
Fulton, T. W., 1905. On the distribution and seasonal abundance of flat fishes (Pleuronectidae) in the North Sea. Report on Fishery and Hydrographical Investigations in the North Sea and adjacent waters for 1902–3 (Northern Area), pp. 471–618.Google Scholar
Fulton, T. W., 1906. On the rate of growth of fishes. Twenty-fourth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland for the year 1905, 3, 179274.Google Scholar
Gulland, J. A., 1965. Manual of methods for fish stock assessment. Part 1: Fish population analysis. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 40, Revision 1, 168.Google Scholar
Heincke, F., 1898. Naturgeschichte des Herings. Teil 1. Abhandlungen des Deutschen seefischereivereins, 2, CXXXVI, 128.Google Scholar
Heincke, F. & Ehrenbaum, E., 1900. Eier und Larven von Fischen der deutschen Bucht. II. Die Bestimmung der schwimmenden Fischeier und die Methodik der Eimessungen. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, Abt. Helgoland, N.F., 3, 127332.Google Scholar
Hickling, C. F. & Rutenberg, E., 1936. The ovary as an indicator of the spawning period in fishes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 21, 311–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, E. W. L., 1892. Survey of fishing grounds, west coast of Ireland, 1890–1891. Reports on the scientific evidence bearing on the economic aspects of the fishes collected during the survey. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society, 7, 4, 388477.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., 1934. Some observations on cod in northern waters. Preliminary report. Fiskeridirektoratets skrifter, Serie Havundersekelser, 4, no. 8, 135.Google Scholar
Jones, A., 1972. Studies on egg development and larval rearing of turbot, Scophthalmus maximus L. and brill, Scophthalmus rhombus L., in the laboratory. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 965986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A., 1973. The ecology of young turbot Scophthalmus maximus L. at Borth, Cardiganshire, Wales. Journal of Fish Biology 5, 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandler, R. & Pirwitz, W., 1957. tiber die Fruchtbarkeit der Plattfische im Nordsee-OstseeRaum. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 13, 1134.Google Scholar
Kennedy, V. S. & Steele, D. H., 1971. The winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) in Long Pond, Conception Bay, Newfoundland. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 28, 11531165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, H. M., 1926. Beobachtungen uber das Wachstum des Steinbutts (R. maximus L.). Fischerbote, 18, 209–12.Google Scholar
Macer, C. T., 1966. Sand eels (Ammodytidae) in the south-western North Sea; their biology and fishery. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series 2, 24, no. 6, 155.Google Scholar
Maier, H. N., 1906. Beitrage zur Altersbestimmung der Fische. 1. Allgemeines. Die Altersbestim-mung nach den Otolithen bei Scholle und Kabeljau. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, Abt. Helgoland, N.F., 8, 60115.Google Scholar
Malm, A. W., 1877. Goteborgs och Bohustldns fauna, Ryggradadjuren, 674 pp. Goteborg.Google Scholar
Masterman, A. T., 1897. A review of the work of the ‘Garland’ in connection with the pelagic eggs of the food fishes, 1890–1896. Fifteenth Annual Report of the Fishery Board for Scotland for the year 1896, 3, 219–45.Google Scholar
Mengi, T., 1963. Uber das Wachstum des Steinbutts (Scophthalmus maximus L.) in der Nordsee. Bericht der Deutschen Nissenschaftlichen Kommission fur Meerseforschung, 17, 119–32 (English Summary).Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. M., 1913. The egg production of certain fishes. Report on Fishery and Hydro-graphical Investigation in the North Sea and adjacent waters for 1908–11 (Northern Area), pp. 191204.Google Scholar
Mobius, K. & Heincke, Fr., 1883. Die Fische der Ostsee. Jahresbericht der Commission zur Wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der Deutschen Meere, in Kiel, 18771881. Jahrg. 7–11, 197–296.Google Scholar
Morgan, R., 1956. World Sea Fisheries, p. 211. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Nikolskii, G. V., 1969. Theory of Fish Population Dynamics (Translated from the Russian by Bradley, J. E. S.) 323 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Rae, B. B., 1957. A preliminary account of the turbot in Scottish waters. Scottish Fisheries Bulletin, 8, 1012.Google Scholar
Scott, D. P., 1962. Effect of food quantity on fecundity of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 19, 715–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A. C, 1951. The fecundity of the plaice. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Series 2, 17, no. 5, 127.Google Scholar
Woodhead, A. D. & Woodhead, P. M. J., 1965. Seasonal changes in the physiology of the Barents Sea cod, Gadus morhua L., in relation to its environment. I. Endocrine changes particularly affecting migration and maturation. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries, Special Publication, 6, 691715.Google Scholar