Skip to main content Accessibility help

Community assembly of glass frogs (Centrolenidae) in a Neotropical wet forest: a test of the river zonation hypothesis

  • Nelson Rivera (a1) (a2) and Brian Folt (a3) (a4)


The river zonation hypothesis predicts that abiotic and biotic conditions along riparian gradients drive variation in animal communities. Glass frogs are a diverse group of Neotropical anurans that use riparian habitats exclusively for oviposition and larval development, but little is known about how glass frog communities are distributed across riparian gradients. Here, we measured glass frog community assembly across a gradient of riparian habitats from first- to fifth-order streams at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. We performed repeated nocturnal frog calling surveys and built occupancy and N-mixture abundance models to test for varying patterns of species occupancy, community assembly, species richness (α-diversity) and species turnover (ß-diversity). We observed significant differences in patterns of species occupancy and community assembly across a stream-order gradient: occupancy of two species increased with stream order (Teratohyla pulverata, Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni), one species decreased (Teratohyla spinosa), and one species did not vary (Espadarana prosoblepon). We evaluated four a priori hypotheses describing how α- and ß-diversity of centrolenids are shaped across the riparian gradient; our data were most consistent with a pattern of nested assemblages and increasing species richness along the riparian gradient. Species-specific patterns of occupancy and abundance resulted in assemblage-level differences consistent with theoretical predictions for highly aquatic organisms along riparian gradients.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
BASELGA, A. 2013. Multiple site dissimilarity quantifies compositional heterogeneity among several sites, while average pairwise dissimilarity may be misleading. Ecography 36:124128.
BRIDGES, A. S. & DORCAS, M. E. 2000. Temporal variation in anuran calling behavior: implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia 2000:587592.
BURNHAM, K. P. & ANDERSON, D. R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York. 488 pp.
CHAO, A. 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783791.
COVICH, A. P. 1988. Geographical and historical comparisons of Neotropical streams: biotic diversity and detrital processing in highly variable habitats. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:361386.
DARRAS, K., PÜTZ, P., FAHRURROZI, REMBOLD K. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2016. Measuring sound detection spaces for acoustic animal sampling and monitoring. Biological Conservation 201:2937.
DELIA, J. R. J., RAMÍREZ-BAUTISTA, A. & SUMMERS, K. 2013. Parents adjust care in response to weather conditions and egg dehydration in a Neotropical glassfrog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67:557569.
DONNELLY, M. A. 1994. Amphibian diversity and natural history. Pp. 199–209 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds). La Selva: ecology and natural history of a Neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
DORCAS, M. E., PRICE, S. J., WALLS, S. C. & BARICHIVICH, W. J. 2009. Auditory monitoring of anuran populations. Pp. 281–298 in Dodd, C. K. (ed.). Conservation and ecology of amphibians. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
DUFRÊNE, M. & LEGENDRE, P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345366.
ETEROVICK, P. C. 2003. Distribution of anuran species among montane streams in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:219228.
ETEROVICK, P. C. & BARATA, I. M. 2006. Distribution of tadpoles within and among Brazilian streams: the influence of predators, habitat size, and heterogeneity. Herpetologica 62:378388.
FISKE, I. & CHANDLER, R. 2011. unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43:123.
GREER, B. & WELLS, K. 1980. Territorial and reproductive behavior of the tropical American frog Centrolenella fleischmanni. Herpetologica 36:318326.
GUAYASAMIN, J. M., CASTROVIEJO-FISHER, S., TRUEB, L., AYARZAGÜENA, J., RADA, M. & VILÀ, C. 2009. Phylogenetic systematics of glassfrogs (Amphibia: Centrolenidae) and their sister taxon Allophryne ruthveni. Zootaxa 2100:197.
GUYER, C. & DONNELLY, M. A. 2005. Amphibians and reptiles of La Selva, Costa Rica, and the Caribbean slope: a comprehensive guide. University of California Press, Berkeley. 299 pp.
HAYES, M. P. 1991. A study of clutch attendance in the Neotropical frog Centrolenella fleischmanni (Anura: Centrolenidae). Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Miami, USA. 240 pp.
HEYER, W. R., DONNELLY, M. A., MCDIARMID, R. W., HAYEK, L. C. & FOSTER, M. S. 1994. Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. 364 pp.
HOFFMANN, H. 2010. Cyanosis by methemoglobinemia in tadpoles of Cochranella granulosa (Anura: Centrolenidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 58:14671478.
HYNES, H. B. N. 1971. Zonation of the invertebrate fauna in a West Indian stream. Hydrobiologia 38:18.
INGER, R. F. & VORIS, H. K. 1993. A comparison of amphibian communities through time and from place to place in Bornean forests. Journal of Tropical Ecology 9:409433.
JACOBSON, S. K. 1985. Reproductive behavior and mating success in two species of glass frogs (Centrolenidae). Herpetologica 41:396404.
KELLER, A., RÖDEL, M. O., LINSENMAIR, K. E. & GRAFE, T. U. 2009. The importance of environmental heterogeneity for species diversity and assemblage structure in Bornean stream frogs. Journal of Animal Ecology 78:305314.
KUBICKI, B. 2007. Glass frogs of Costa Rica. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, INBio, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica. 281 pp.
MACKENZIE, D. I., NICHOLS, J. D., LACHMAN, G. B., DROEGE, S., ROYLE, A. J. & LANGTIMM, C. A. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:22482255.
MANGOLD, A., TRENKWALDER, K., RINGLER, M., HÖDL, W. & RINGLER, E. 2015. Low reproductive skew despite high male-biased operational sex ratio in a glass frog with paternal care. BMC Evolutionary Biology 15:181.
MAZEROLLE, M. J., BAILEY, L. L., KENDALL, W. L., ROYLE, J. A., CONVERSE, S. J. & NICHOLS, J. D. 2007. Making great leaps forward: accounting for detectability in herpetological field studies. Journal of Herpetology 41:672689.
MCCAFFERY, R. & LIPS, K. 2013. Survival and abundance in males of the glass frog Espadarana (Centrolene) prosoblepon in central Panama. Journal of Herpetology 47:162168.
MCDADE, L. A. & HARTSHORN, G. S. 1994. La Selva Biological Station. Pp. 614 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds). La Selva: ecology and natural history of a Neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
MCDIARMID, R. 1983. Centrolenella fleischmanni (Ranita de Vidrio, Glass Frog). Pp. 389390 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
OVASKA, K. & RAND, A. S. 1999. Courtship and reproductive behavior of the frog Eleutherodactylus diastema (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Gamboa, Panama. Journal of Herpetology 35:4450.
RAMÍREZ, A. & PRINGLE, C. M. 2001. Spatial and temporal patterns of invertebrate drift in streams draining a Neotropical landscape. Freshwater Biology 46:4762.
RICE, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223225.
RIOS-SOTO, J. A., OSPINA-L, A. M. & VARGAS-SALINAS, F. 2017. The advertisement call and notes on the reproductive ecology of the glassfrog “Centrolenequindianum (Anura: Centrolenidae). South American Journal of Herpetology 12:117227.
ROYLE, J. A. 2004. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60:108115.
SANFORD, R. L., PAABY, P., LUVALL, J. C. & PHILLIPS, E. 1994. Climate, geomorphology, and aquatic systems. Pp. 1933 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds). La Selva: ecology and natural history of a Neotropical rain forest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
SAVAGE, J. M. 2002. The amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica: a herpetofauna between two continents, between two seas. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 945 pp.
SMITH, L. L., BARICHIVICH, W. J., STAIGER, J. S., SMITH, K. G. & DODD, C. K. 2006. Detection probabilities and site occupancy estimates for amphibians at Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge. American Midland Naturalist 155:149161.
STEEN, D. A., MCCLLURE, C. J. W. & GRAHAM, S. P. 2013. Relative influence of weather and season on anuran calling activity. Canadian Journal of Zoology 467:462467.
STRAHLER, A. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. American Geophysical Union 38:913920.
VANNOTE, R. L., MINSHALL, W. G., CUMMINS, K. W., SEDELL, J. R. & CUSHING, C. E. 1980. The river continuum concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:130137.
WELLBORN, G. A., SKELLY, D. K. & WERNER, E. E. 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:337363.


Community assembly of glass frogs (Centrolenidae) in a Neotropical wet forest: a test of the river zonation hypothesis

  • Nelson Rivera (a1) (a2) and Brian Folt (a3) (a4)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed