Skip to main content Accessibility help

Effects of forest age on fruit composition and removal in tropical bird-dispersed understorey trees

  • Heather A. Lumpkin (a1) and W. Alice Boyle (a2)

Little is known about how land-use changes affect interspecific interactions such as fruit–frugivore mutualisms. Forest age could affect both fruit sugar concentrations via differences in light availability or disperser abundance, and fruit removal rates via differences in bird and plant community composition. We examined how these two factors are affected by forest age in a Costa Rican rain forest. We compared seven young-secondary forest species, seven old-growth forest species, and Miconia nervosa growing in both forests. We measured sugar concentrations in fruits and manipulated the location of paired fruiting branches, measuring subsequent fruit removal. Sugar concentration means were on average 2.1 percentage points higher in young-secondary forest species than in old-growth forest species, but did not differ among Miconia nervosa fruits from the two forests. Fruit removal rates were higher in young-secondary forest for 86% of young-secondary forest species, 71% of old-growth forest species, and on average for both young-secondary and old-growth forest Miconia nervosa individuals. Higher sugar concentrations in young-secondary forest plants could reflect stronger competition for dispersers, while experimental fruit removal results suggests the opposite patterns of competition; fruits are more likely to be removed by dispersers in young-secondary forest independent of fruit nutrient concentration.

Corresponding author
1Corresponding author. Current address: Department of Zoology, Birge Hall, University of Wisconsin, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Email:
Hide All
ALTSHULER, D. L. 2001. Ultraviolet reflectance in fruits, ambient light composition and fruit removal in a tropical forest. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:767778.
BLAKE, J. G. & HOPPES, W. G. 1986. Influence of resource abundance on use of tree-fall gaps by birds in an isolated woodlot. Auk 103:328340.
BLAKE, J. G. & LOISELLE, B. A. 1991. Variation in resource abundance affects capture rates of birds in three lowland habitats in Costa Rica. Auk 108:114130.
BLAKE, J. G. & LOISELLE, B. A. 1992. Fruits in the diets of neotropical migrant birds in Costa Rica. Biotropica 24:200210.
BLAKE, J. G. & LOISELLE, B. A. 2001. Bird assemblages in second-growth and old-growth forests, Costa Rica: perspectives from mist nets and point counts. Auk 118:304326.
BLAKE, J. G., STILES, F. G. & LOISELLE, B. A. 1990. Birds of La Selva Biological Station: habitat use, trophic composition, and migrants. Pp. 161182 in Gentry, A. (ed.). Four Neotropical rainforests. Yale University Press, New Haven.
BOYLE, W. A. 2006. Why do birds migrate? The role of food, habitat, predation, and competition. PhD thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
BUTTERFIELD, R. P. 1994. The regional context: land colonization and conservation in Sarapiquí. Pp. 299306 in McDade, L. A., Bawa, K. S., Hespenheide, H. A. & Hartshorn, G. S. (eds.). La Selva: ecology and natural history of a Neotropical rain forest. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
CARLO, T. A. 2005. Interspecific neighbors change seed dispersal pattern of an avian-dispersed plant. Ecology 86:24402449.
CHAZDON, R. L. 2003. Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 6:5171.
CHAZDON, R. L. & FETCHER, N. 1984. Photosynthetic light environments in a lowland tropical rain forest in Costa Rica. Journal of Ecology 72:553564.
CHAZDON, R. L., CAREAGA, S., WEBB, C. & VARGAS, O. 2003. Community and phylogenetic structure of reproductive traits of woody species in wet tropical forests. Ecological Monographs 73:331348.
ELZINGA, J. A., ATLAN, A., BIERE, A., GIGORD, L., WEIS, A. E. & BERNASCONI, G. 2007. Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interaction. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:432439.
FERNANDES, D. N. & SANFORD, R. L. 1995. Effects of recent land-use practices on soil nutrients and succession under tropical wet forest in Costa Rica. Conservation Biology 9:915922.
HARTSHORN, G. S. 1983. Plants: introduction. Pp. 118157 in Janzen, D. H. (ed.). Costa Rican natural history. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
HOULE, G. 1995. Seed dispersal and seedling recruitment: the missing link(s). Ecoscience 2:238244.
HOWE, H. F. & MIRITI, M. N. 2000. No question: seed dispersal matters. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 15:34436.
ITTO. 2002. International Tropical Timber Organization guidelines for the restoration, management and rehabilitation of degraded and secondary tropical forests. ITTO Policy Development Series No. 13.
JORDANO, P. 1995. Fleshy fruits and seed dispersers: a comparative analysis of adaptation and constraints in plant–animal interactions. American Naturalist 145:163191.
LEVEY, D. J. 1987a. Seed size and fruit-handling techniques of avian frugivores. American Naturalist 129:471485.
LEVEY, D. J. 1987b. Sugar-tasting ability and fruit selection in tropical fruit-eating birds. Auk 104:173179.
LEVEY, D. J. 1988a. Spatial and temporal variation in Costa Rican fruit and fruit-eating bird abundance. Ecological Monographs 58:251269.
LEVEY, D. J. 1988b. Tropical wet forest treefall gaps and distributions of understory birds and plants. Ecology 69:10761089.
LOISELLE, B. A. & BLAKE, J. G. 1990. Diets of understory fruit-eating birds in Costa Rica: seasonality and resource abundance. Studies in Avian Biology 13:91103.
LOISELLE, B. A. & BLAKE, J. G. 1999. Dispersal of melastome seeds by fruit-eating birds of tropical forest understory. Ecology 80:330336.
MARTÍNEZ-GARZA, C. & HOWE, H. F. 2003. Restoring tropical diversity: beating the time tax on species loss. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:423429.
MONTGOMERY, R. A. & CHAZDON, R. L. 2001. Forest structure, canopy architecture, and light transmittance in tropical wet forests. Ecology 82:27072718.
ÖDEEN, A. & HÅSTAD, O. 2003. Complex distribution of avian color vision systems revealed by sequencing the SWS1 opsin from total DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20:855861.
POULIN, B., WRIGHT, S. J., LEFEBVRE, G. & CALDERON, O. 1999. Interspecific synchrony and asynchrony in the fruiting phenologies of congeneric bird-dispersed plants in Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 15:213227.
PRINGLE, C., CHACON, I., GRAYUM, M., GREENE, H., HARTSHORN, G., SCHATZ, G., STILES, G., GOMEZ, C. & RODRIGUEZ, M. 1984. Natural history observations and ecological evaluation of the La Selva Protection Zone, Costa Rica. Brenesia 22:189206.
RESTREPO, C., GOMEZ, N. & HEREDIA, S. 1999. Anthropogenic edges, treefall gaps, and fruit–frugivore interactions in a neotropical montane forest. Ecology 80:668685.
SANFORD, K & CLAYTON, N. S. 2008. Motivation and memory in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) foraging behaviour. Animal Cognition 11:189198.
SCHAEFER, H. M., SCHAEFER, V. & LEVEY, D. J. 2004. How plant–animal interactions signal new insights in communication. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:577584.
STILES, F. G. & ROSSELLI, L. 1993. Consumption of fruits of the Melastomataceae by birds: how diffuse is the coevolution? Vegetatio 108:5773.
WATSON, R, WRIGHT, C. J., MCBURNEY, T., TAYLOR, A. J. & LINFORTH, R. S. T. 2002. Influence of harvest date and light integral on the development of strawberry flavour compounds. Journal of Experimental Botany 53:21212129.
WHEELWRIGHT, N. T. & ORIANS, G. H. 1982. Seed dispersal by animals: contrasts with pollen dispersal, problems with terminology, constraints on coevolution. American Naturalist 119:402413.
WUNDERLE, J. M., WILLIG, M. R. & PINTO-HENRIQUES, L. M. 2005. Avian distribution in treefall gaps and understory of terra firme forest in the lowland Amazon. Ibis 147:109129.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Tropical Ecology
  • ISSN: 0266-4674
  • EISSN: 1469-7831
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-tropical-ecology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed